15 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
excellent look at a historical true crime incident, August 17, 2002
This review is from: The Butcher's Tale: Murder and Anti-Semitism in a German Town (Hardcover)
In March 1900 in Konitz, Prussia, two townsfolk find a package containing the upper body of a missing young man. Other body parts wrapped inside packing paper typically used for meat are subsequently found throughout the town. Though the authorities believe the local Christian butcher killed the lad, rumors abound even way beyond the town's borders that the Jews performed an ancient ritual using the blood of Christians in the baking of Passover matzo. Taken seriously by many Christians, riots and other violent acts against the Jewish community occurred.
THE BUTCHER'S TALE is an excellent look at a true crime incident that led to unproved accusations followed by anti-Semitic rioting and acts of violence against the Jewish population. Dr. Helmut Walser Smith provides deep insight into the historical evidence, especially collected in minute detail by the police and uses this anecdotal case to prove the "process" of turning personal bias and local quarrels into a structured vicious attack on a weaker relation in this case the Jews. Generalizations can be drawn from this powerful work that takes a specific medieval belief applied at the beginning of the twentieth century and yet the use of accusing a scapegoat seems so commonplace throughout the world of today.
Harriet Klausner
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
One if the best history books, May 5, 2004
This review is from: The Butcher's Tale: Murder and Anti-Semitism in a German Town (Hardcover)
I was recently assigned to read this book for a World Civilizations history course in college, and I was surprised by how interesting it turned out to be.
The author offers historical facts and evidence of a supposed 'ritual murder' in Konitz, a German town. But it reads like a suspense story that makes you want to keep reading to know what happened.
I strongly recommend this book to those interested in anti-Semitism and history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good, but could be even better, November 26, 2009
This is a good book, though I believe it could have been even better. The story that is being told here is quite an important one. It has been rather neglected in modern history books (which is why Smith's book fills a gap), but in the years and even decades immediately after Winter's murder the incident was debated endlessly in newspapers and anti-Semitic literature. The Nazi propaganda paper 'Der Stürmer' even ran a long serial about it towards the end of World War II, trying to whip up as much frenzy of racial hatred as possible. In the main, this story is retold quite competently in 'The Butcher's Tale.' And whoever reads the book will learn all that is necessary about it, in full detail.
Smith is a historian who was here given the opportunity to write for a wider audience. I wonder if the publishers had a hand in prompting him to tailor his prose for that purpose. I'm all in favor of micro-history, and I'm certainly not complaining that the work is too detailed. But I suspect that to a degree, effective communication has here been sacrificed on the altar of cheap suspense. We do not know who murdered Winter, and though I have no quarrel with Smith for not revealing this until the end (usually, readers want their crime stories to have a resolution, after all), I sometimes felt that he was at pains to obscure this in order to maintain his readers' interest.
Another drawback is that Smith's tone can at times be rather moralistic, even preaching, though always in a subtle manner. From the start I had the feeling that the only person in Konitz Smith knew for sure couldn't be the murderer was the Jewish butcher, the man whom the anti-Semites pointed to as their scapegoat. The scapegoating certainly did take place, and that is also, indeed, the main lesson to be learned from this story. But by focusing almost exclusively on this most crude and immediate aspect of the anti-Semitic response, Smith fails to see the other ways in which anti-Jewish propaganda could utilize these events. Often, indeed, Smith's account reads rather like the sometimes overly apologetic reporting offered in the liberal press at the time. And it was often at this type of reporting that the conservatives and anti-Semites could strike most effectively, charging that while they (the conservatives) were not pointing their fingers at anyone but merely pleading for a fair investigation and eventual trial, the liberals were obstructing this by sermonizing about how the murderer must under no circumstances be the Jewish butcher. They would say, in effect, that the 'blood libel' was not an argument that they used, but that the liberals used. Certainly, this was all fundamentally dishonest, as they were indeed counting on the more rabble-rousing brand of anti-Semites to do the dirty work, while leaving the more subtle, 'intellectual' propaganda to them. The point here is merely that Smith misses this secondary type of propaganda by exclusively concentrating on the primary type.
Still, this is a good--and easy--read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No