| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Changing of power,
By Roel (Mechelen Belgium) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Byzantium and Venice: A Study in Diplomatic and Cultural Relations (Paperback)
Nicol describes in a most accurate way the changing relations between Byzantium and Venice. Venice started of as one of the last remaining part of the Byzantine Empire in the North of Italy. Nicol shows how Venice gained it independence, became the equal and finally the overshadowed the crippling Byzantine empire.Nicol shows carefully what the difference is between the official documents and reality. Byzantium saw itself as the rightful ruler of even Venice, although in the later stages Venice was equal and even stronger than Byzantium. I found the book easy to read and very interesting. The book beautifully reflects the changing of power from the East to the West. However some general knowledge about Venice and Byzantium are preferable. Since I'm missing the former a bit, some things where more difficult to place it historical.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
I generally agree with the review below,
By
This review is from: Byzantium and Venice: A Study in Diplomatic and Cultural Relations (Paperback)
For me, and I think for Professor Nicol (judging from the book's cover), the themes of the book are more or less crystalized in the fact that many (most?) of the most beautiful pieces of public art in Venice were looted from Constantinople during the 4th Crusade. At first an ally, Venice ultimately helped to displace and replace the empire, literally. If you've read Norwich, you'll find that this book nicely fills in the details of this part of the story.This is essentially a diplomatic and military history. I do wish the author had spent more time on "Cultural Relations," but this shortcoming may be due to the paucity of primary sources, as much as anything. The author's historiographical asides on the value and credibility of contemporaneous sources (and occasional jabs at other scholars) are among the pleasures of this book.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|