2 Reviews
|
5 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
4 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
3 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
2 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
1 star:
|
|
(0) |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Pretty good lens
Cons: Its not fancy looking, shots are not consistently good, lots of bad reviews
Pros: Nice vibrant colors, cheap (paid $65), cheap wide angle. Well kept secret, like Canon 50mm 1.8 II...
Published on July 30, 2008 by R. Garcia
|
 |
3 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Made by Hoya?
Given that most Quantaray (Ritz Camera's store brand) lenses are made by Sigma, I was surprised to read that this 19-35mm is made by Hoya. I went down to my local Ritz store and asked them about it. As usual, the clerks there couldn't answer my question.
If this is indeed a Hoya lens, then it's probably best to stay away from it. Hoya is known for making...
Published on January 8, 2005 by Gadgester
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Pretty good lens, July 30, 2008
This review is from: CL) U)QUAN 19-35MM F3.5-4 F/NIKON (Electronics)
Cons: Its not fancy looking, shots are not consistently good, lots of bad reviews
Pros: Nice vibrant colors, cheap (paid $65), cheap wide angle. Well kept secret, like Canon 50mm 1.8 II...
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Made by Hoya?, January 8, 2005
This review is from: CL) U)QUAN 19-35MM F3.5-4 F/NIKON (Electronics)
Given that most Quantaray (Ritz Camera's store brand) lenses are made by Sigma, I was surprised to read that this 19-35mm is made by Hoya. I went down to my local Ritz store and asked them about it. As usual, the clerks there couldn't answer my question.
If this is indeed a Hoya lens, then it's probably best to stay away from it. Hoya is known for making dirt-cheap, low-quality stuff. This is not to say this lens is total trash, and if you have a cheap Nikon SLR and just want a relatively inexpensive wideangle lens, this may still work for you -- although $200 is a lot of money in my book. I'm staying away from this one. I can get a Tamron for just a little more but its quality is many times superior.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
|