7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A great antidote to the misperception that the open source movement is about computers, September 20, 2005
If you think peer-to-peer collaboration is the exclusive province of 21st-century computer nerds, this hefty anthology will open your eyes to its precedents among indigenous cultures and its growing offshoots in pursuits as lofty as genomics and as mundane as proofreading.
Readers accustomed to open software manifestos by programmers like Richard Stallman or Eric Raymond will find much of this volume phrased in the academic lingo of economics or political science rather than geekspeak; the writing in the first section, mostly by anthropologists, can be turgid. But don't let that deter you, for the book's first section contains some of the most nuanced perspectives on the concept of the cultural and economic "commons"--in particular, on how its European variant is only a simplistic reflection of its older and more complicated origin among native peoples.
From anthropology the book winds its way through economics, public policy, and the life sciences, ranging from flights of theory to examples grounded in local cultures. (Did you know that copyright is stifling folk singers in Irish pubs, or that the Aboriginal word for "property" is the same as their word for "relative"?)
A particular eye-opener is Yochai Benkler's "Coase's Penguin," which traces commons-based collaboration in such diverse fields as NASA crater identification, encyclopedia writing, and proofreading--noting that the quality of anonymous contributions of online volunteers to such cultural and scientific production is often indistinguishable from that of paid professionals. John Clippinger and David Bollier's "Renaissance of the Commons," on the other hand, is a manifesto for open culture grounded in scientific revelations from recent research in neuroscience and behavioral psychology. It's an essay guaranteed to make copyright maximalists frown and commons advocates jump out of their seat and say, "Yes, I knew it!"
CODE is a circuitous but rewarding examination of open collaboration, a theory and practice poised to revolutionize the fields represented in this book and beyond.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Offers depth and detail to oft-debated topics concerning creativity, November 18, 2007
This book takes off from the common observation that something is
severely broken about our view of creativity and knowledge. The
observation is usually directed to legal policies ("intellectual
property" regimes) but has implications for economic thinking and
culture as well. The book applies research in communities ranging from
indigenous peoples to computer hackers to seek new legal and economic
alternatives to foster creativity.
Each chapter in this book has something to offer, even to readers who
are already following current controversies over music sharing,
reverse engineering of source code, patent reform, etc. The chapters
that cover well-known controversies do so in unusual depth and with
refreshingly bold recommendations.
In addition to these chapters, many others offer interesting
perspectives, such as Paul A. David's look at the history of the
scientific method, and several anthropologists writing about the
sophistication of views among indigenous peoples on creativity and the
ownership of knowledge. Like Jon Ippolito in his review, I found the
anthropological writings tough to get through, but a second reading
always revealed their key points.
This book contains some important historical documents, some good
exercises to stretch your mind, and some truly promising directions to
explore in order to fix the system that controls and rewards the
dissemination of knowledge.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No