| ||||||||||||||||||
![]() Sell Back Your Copy for $46.75
Whether you bought it on Amazon or somewhere else, you can sell it back through our Book Trade-In Program at the current price of $46.75.
Used Price$67.50
Trade-in Price$46.75
Price after
Trade-in$20.75 |
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Figuring that I'd received a decent mathematical background, I tried studying math at a higher level 5 years ago when I left medical practice. Strichartz was dense and I spent hours puzzling over notation in the first edition (until I found that some of the most confusing parts were actually errors not all of which were corrected in the second paperback edition). I made it about half way through -- it just seemed too abstract. Abbott's book was also quite good, but again pure analysis is about the logical structure underneath mathematics (something I certainly was trying to understand).
Having read the rave reviews of Spivak's book in this forum, I bought it (along with the answer book), and have spent the last 8 months going through it, and doing about 3/4 of the problems. It is marvellous. The exposition is clear and friendly (as are Strichartz and Abbott) -- something not seen in the math books of the 50s (although Spivak's first edition goes back to 1968). Almost nothing is assumed (except the properties of the rational numbers). Everything is derived from them and clearly (including one construction of the real numbers from the rational numbers at the end and (typically) two more constructions of the reals in the problems at the end of that chapter). Even better -- the book doesn't just show you how mathematical consequences follow logically from inscrutible definitions. It shows you why the definitions must be the way they are. The chapter on the definitions and properties of the logarithmic and the exponential functions is aparticularly fine example of this technique and of Spivak's teaching style.
One does not study human anatomy by studying only the bones which hold up the physical structure, although without bones we are a just pile of goo. To learn anatomy one must also study the flesh draped on the (physical/logical) skeleton. This is also where Spivak excels. There are plenty of examples sprinkled throughout the text in addition to the logical structure -- several whole chapters are devoted to applications of the theory just developed. The real mathematical flesh is in the exercises. None of them are trivial. None are of the 'plug and chug' variety seen in Thomas-- which amazingly is still out there -- it was my text in 1956. They are best described as 'blink and think'. I don't think it would be possible to use the book for self-study with no teacher to talk to without getting the answer book. Spivak supplies answers and/or hints to only about 10% of the problems. The answer book does the rest (although I think it does contain a few typos).
The book would have been very difficult to use as a Freshman, with no calculus exposure while taking physics at the same time (which most of us did back then). Derivatives aren't introduced for a long time, and integrals even later. The Freshman physics course started right off with Newton's laws (this was John Wheeler after all). However, once Spivak gets you to derivatives and integrals you will understand them, rather than just mouthing formulas.
Spivak certainly isn't the only analysis book you'll need. Both Strichartz and Abbott go a lot farther. The book contains nothing about Fourier series or higher dimensions. However, Spivak is certainly the place to start if you want to understand "what's going on under the hood" as another reviewer put it. Hopefully I'll now be able to re-read Strichartz and Abbott having seen and pondered the mathematical flesh which is draped on the logical bones these two books discuss.
On the other hand, Spivak serves as excellent preparation for one's first real analysis course: ideally, read through this book (and, crucially, do ALL the exercises) the summer before introductory analysis, and you'll be in great shape to tackle the likes of Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis." In the process, you'll also build a much deeper understanding and appreciation of the material covered in first-year calculus.
Spivak's book is also a wonderful re-introduction to mathematics for those who've been away for a while. It's very well suited to independent study, and Spivak is an excellent teacher.
The book is carefully written, chatty but not informal, conversational but not overly long-winded. The exercises are challenging, but provide additional insight into the material and, more importantly, deepen your understanding and build your problem-solving and proof-writing skills. With patience and diligence they're all quite solvable by anyone who has, or who is serious about cultivating, a little mathematical maturity.
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|