Customer Reviews


5 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars excellent pan
I bought this pan to replace one that I ruined which belonged to a friend. After giving t to him, a week later he asked if I wanted to ruin more of his cookware for him. He loves it.
Published on July 12, 2007 by Shane Schofield

versus
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Here's why I do NOT recommend this item:
1. There are seams in the corners which are VERY difficult to clean.
2. After using this pan only 5 times, it discolored.

I'm sorry I bought this particular brand/design in 3 sizes. :(
Published on February 15, 2009 by loftylanachgo


Most Helpful First | Newest First

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Here's why I do NOT recommend this item:, February 15, 2009
This review is from: Calphalon Classic Bakeware 12-by-17-Inch Rectangular Nonstick Baking/Roasting Pan (Kitchen)
1. There are seams in the corners which are VERY difficult to clean.
2. After using this pan only 5 times, it discolored.

I'm sorry I bought this particular brand/design in 3 sizes. :(
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Not so great, May 19, 2009
This review is from: Calphalon Classic Bakeware 12-by-17-Inch Rectangular Nonstick Baking/Roasting Pan (Kitchen)
The corners have seams which trap food easily. It is VERY difficult to clean--I have to use toothpicks to get the corners clean. In addition the pan stains easily and no amount of scrubbing can eliminate the stains. Would NOT recommend. There are surely better pans out there. The only impressive thing about this pan is its hefty weight. Other than that, don't bother with it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars excellent pan, July 12, 2007
By 
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Calphalon Classic Bakeware 12-by-17-Inch Rectangular Nonstick Baking/Roasting Pan (Kitchen)
I bought this pan to replace one that I ruined which belonged to a friend. After giving t to him, a week later he asked if I wanted to ruin more of his cookware for him. He loves it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Great buy, August 23, 2010
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Calphalon Classic Bakeware 12-by-17-Inch Rectangular Nonstick Baking/Roasting Pan (Kitchen)
Contrary to a few other reviews out there, I found this pan to be great for the 50th birthday cake that I baked for my husband. I had no problems with anything sticking to the sides of the pan - in fact the cake came out quite easily and cleaned up just fine.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3.0 out of 5 stars Not what I would consider the correct size, January 27, 2012
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Calphalon Classic Bakeware 12-by-17-Inch Rectangular Nonstick Baking/Roasting Pan (Kitchen)
When I purchased this item, I already owned a Calphalon 12x17 "Jelly Roll Pan" and a Silpat E04 11.5x16.5 mat. The Jelly Roll Pan is good quality and actually measures 11.5x16.5 internally at the bottom, and the Silpat fits perfectly. I have had the occasion to want a deep baking pan with the Silpat and was delighted to see that Calphalon makes a 12x17 deep baking pan. I presumed that the two 12x17 pans would be the same size. When I received it, I immediately found that the Silpat would not fit and that the inside bottom of this pan is closer to 11.25x16.75. I'm not sure if this is a standard baking nominal size, but I will be returning the baking pan.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product