Customer Reviews

The Candy Snatchers

5 star:		(3)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

The Candy Snatchers is a totally awesome movie.There is nothing to hate in this classic exploitation.
Fantastic plot with fine one liner dialogue and a wicked black sense of humour!
The acting is way above average for a 70's low budget pic.
I was thrilled from start to finish, dare I even say that this is probably the best exploitation movie I have seen to date!
Tarantino must have seen this movie countless times, there are at least two scenes in the candy snatchers which reminded me of Kill Bill 2 and Reservoir Dogs!
Forget the ultra boring Thriller(They call her one eye) the one overhyped by Tarantino himself.
The Candy Snatchers is the way to go if you REALLY want to see a classic from an era that will undoubtly ever come again!
Although this is an exploitation movie, this movie is very light on violence and nudity, and I am glad it is!
You don't need to be extreme to make a great exploitation movie.
Well done Subversive for giving us a fantastic release.
The Candy Snatchers stands proud in my dvd collection.
10/10

Although the theme song is a little corny, the acting is strong and the characters are sympathetic, especially Shawn Newton and Candy Phillips. A tragic ending but the movie was rife with tragic characters.

This is an exploitation movie, so I won't say about the movie itself.

As far as the transfer goes, the picture quality is awesome.
This will be a very pleasant surprise if you were disappointed by its bootlegs before -- for one, I didn't know this movie was supposed to show blue skies! Well, one gripe is that now the fake blood looks too fakey bright, but perhaps that's about right for a '70s camp.

Before this, all internet movie stores appeared to carry copies of basically *one* version, and it must have been a video recording of a small projection screen.

The bonus material was generous. The fact that they were able to interview the 2 actresses after 30 years is just amazing. (However, poor Susan Sennett says a few times that she just needed rent money and would rather forget having made this movie.)

the movie was out of print but I was curious and it turned out to be a tale of double crossing, some topless scenes for Tifanny Bolling and violent resolution. It is a standard 70's sleaze picture, which I like, but if you have more genteel tastes, this probably isn't for you

The Candy Snatchers (Guerdon Trueblood, 1973)

Wow. I'm trying to imagine the guts it must have taken in 1973 to take the exploitation film and throw such a nihilistic twist on it that it goes farther than most noir films. What kind of mind would make a movie like this? Perhaps more importantly, what movie house executive would greenlight releasing such a thing? And is there a snowball's chance in hell that it would ever happen now, twenty-three years later? (Short answer: no.) While The Candy Snatchers falls short of true genius, it sure was a gutsy attempt to redefine the world of exploitation cinema.

Candy (Susan Sennett of Big Bad Mama) is the sixteen-year-old daughter of jewelry store manager Avery (Tell Me That You Love Me, Junie Moon's Ben Piazza). Three wannabe criminals-- Jessie (Playboy playmate Tiffany Bolling), her psychotic brother Alan (Brad David, who never appeared on the big screen again), and their pal Eddie (Vince Martorano, who comes out of almost twenty years of retirement later this year in Lady Magdalene's)-- hatch a plan to kidnap Candy and hold her for ransom. Things go awry when Avery doesn't show up at the drop site, and the ineptness of the criminal element quickly comes to the fore. Adding to the hilarity is mute toddler Sean (Trueblood's son Christopher), who sees the kidnappers deposit Candy the first afternoon, and quickly becomes intrigued with the plot.

This is a nasty, nasty movie in every way. I haven't looked it up, but I'm guessing Quentin Tarantino watched this film at least once during the writing of the Reservoir Dogs script. What was pushing the envelope in 1991 was way out beyond the bounds in 1973. This is awesome. It's cheesy as all hell, but that's a whole lot of the charm. You're going to love this. ***

This film,until this release,was indeed a "lost" classic,rarely seen after it's initial release in the early 70's.Subversive has changed that with this superior release.If your tastes run towards the grindhouse exploitation films from that era,you will be in "hog heaven",my friend - a true classic.If "grindhouse exploitation film" has you scratching your head in bewilderment,this film then may not be for you and you should head to Blockbuster for the "flavour of the week".....

I've always been partial to obscure, oddball films from the 1970s and the feature The Candy Snatchers (1973) certainly fits the bill, especially in terms of the former since it's never had an official home video release in any format until now. Written by Bryan Gindoff (Hard Times) and directed by Guerdon Trueblood, whose credits primarily consist of writing on such television films as The Savage Bees (1976) and Tarantulas: The Deadly Cargo (1977), The Candy Snatchers features former playmate (April '72) Tiffany Bolling (Bonnie's Kids, Kingdom of the Spiders), Ben Piazza (The Bad News Bears), Susan Sennett (Big Bad Mama), Brad David ("Diary of a Teenage Hitchhiker"), and Vince Martorano (Cornbread, Earl and Me). Also appearing is Bonnie Boland ("Chico and the Man"), Dolores Dorn (Underworld U.S.A.), Phyllis Major, one time wife to singer Jackson Browne prior to her 1976 death by overdose, and Christopher Trueblood, son of the director (he's listed in the end credits only as `Christophe').

As the film begins we witness a trio of amateur criminals, two men and a woman, in a funky van grabbing a Catholic school girl named Candy (Sennett) off the street and driving her into the hills of southern California. After binding, gagging, and blindfolding the girl, the trio proceeds to bury her in a box in the ground, with a small pipe protruding for air, near an abandoned cabin in which they've since taken residence. The three sociopaths are comprised of the following...an attractive blonde woman named Jessie (Bolling), who seems to be the leader, her stringy, switchblade wielding brother Alan (David), and a dopey looking ox/army veteran named Eddie (Martorano). Anyway, after they leave a doofy looking blonde kid named Sean, who happens to be mute, appears from the shrubs, apparently having witnessed the burial proceedings, and start messing around with the air pipe, even dropping pieces of food down the hole, but is soon called away by his weirdo mother (Boland) ringing an obnoxious cowbell (Sean and his parents live down the hill apiece). Alright, so now we begin to learn something of the kidnappers plans...seems Candy's father, Avery (Piazza) manages a jewelry store and the plan is to hold the girl hostage until pops pays them off with scads of jewels and such. Thing is, Avery doesn't seem all that concerned when he finds out what's happened, even to the point where he lies to his drunky wife about why their daughter hasn't returned home (given the fact Avery's wife is soused quite often she's easy to manipulate). Turns out Avery's got a chippie on the side (he's snogging an employee, played by Major), and for reasons which I won't reveal here, he's actually glad of what's happened so far. The kidnappers are suitably perturbed, believing they're not being taken seriously, and decide to up the ante, but given their overall ineptness, things continually go afoul. Eventually tensions (and paranoia) within the group push those involved further and further over the edge, forcing more drastic (and depraved) actions to follow...

The Candy Snatchers is one hell of an odd film, certainly not for everyone, but I sure enjoyed it...the kidnappers themselves come off pretty goofy, given their ineptitude, almost to the point of appearing like comical villains often depicted in some of the Disney live action films of the 1970s, except for the fact here they're homicidal sociopaths willing to resort to extreme violence to get what they want. Here they've spent an extensive amount of time planning what they believe to be the perfect crime, the kidnapping of a diamond dealer's daughter, and guess what? The guy doesn't even care...seriously, in his eyes, given his situation, it actually fits in with his plans. That's the main plot of the film, but there's secondary element thrown in that often includes some rather bizarre sequences involving the little mute boy Sean, played by the director's son. The kid, who appeared to have albino qualities, runs about with a scraggy white mop top, sometimes trying to communicate what he's witnessed, often ending up on the receiving end of some kind of punishment from his seriously wacked out mother (at one point she's so frustrated with the child she forces him to take a downer). My favorite scene is when the kid, trying to use the phone to call the authorities to help Candy, ends up calling a Jewish deli, apparently in New York. Since the kid can't talk, he tries to use a talking doll with a pull string on its back to communicate with the old man who answers, to which the man thinks it's all a prank by some punk and tells the caller to shove a salami up his ash. The real strength in this film was it's unpredictable, off the wall nature as the story featured a number of various twists that kept me guessing. I thought the performances were decent enough, although Ms. Bolling seemed to be the standout. The direction was tight (even if some aspects of the story weren't), and kept me thoroughly engaged (the finale was a real hoot). While this isn't a slick feature (the production values were minimal), it still looks decent enough. There is some strong violence throughout (including a couple of forcible violations, some gunshot wounds, beatings, etc.), so if you're squeamish towards that kind of thing, then this probably isn't the film for you. For the rest, enjoy a curious edgy, sleazy, sometimes rough nugget of exploitation that's rarely been seen in thirty years. By the way, this film is worth checking out if only to see the hilarious sequence where the gang tries to liberate a telephone company van from a lone worker (the worker turns out to be an uncooperative handful).

The picture, restored and presented in widescreen (1.85:1) format, enhanced for 16X9 TVs, looks excellent and the audio, available in both Dolby Digital stereo remix and original mono comes across crystal clear, so you all can chuck those old bootlegs you've been clinging to over the years. As far as extras on this Subversive Cinema DVD release, there's quite a few including a commentary track with stars Tiffany Bolling and Susan Sennett, moderated by Norman Hill, the producer of the DVD and Marc Eduard Heuck, a promotional still gallery, a featurette titled The Women of Candy Snatchers (31:53), extensive cast and crew bios, three 5x7 reproduction lobby cards, a nifty poster reproduction of some European artwork for the film, and various trailers including two for this film (one for the PG rated version and another for the R rated version), Freakmaker aka The Mutations (1974), Metal Skin (1994), Battlefield Baseball (2003), and The Witch Who Came from the Sea (1976). I have to say, I've purchased a number of Subversive Cinema's DVD releases and I've always been impressed with their superior efforts. Their releases may seem a bit pricey, but I've always felt I've gotten my money's worth.

Cookieman108

Speaking of obscure cinematic gems from the 1970s I'd like to see Subversive release another Tiffany Bolling drive-in feature favorite titled Bonnie's Kids (1973), as it's another film that's languished out of the public eye for far too long.

The Candy Snatchers was a pretty good 70's exploitation flick, a lost gem that's been out of print for many years. This sleazy kidnapping story was also inspired by Last House on The Left, while it might look like a rippoff it's completely different and it also has a great and unique storyline. The Candy Snatchers is quite a treat and is almost like a crime thriller. The movie centers around 3 kidnappers - Alan (Brad David), his sister Jessie played by hot playboy model Tiffany Bolling and Eddy who plan on kidnapping young Candy and holding her ransom in exchange for a briefcase full of diamonds that her step-father has access to. Aside from Candy just about every character depicted here is despicable. Her stepfather refuses to give in to the ransom. Seeing as he'll receive half of her inheritance if she dies, he could care less what becomes of Candy. To keep Candy hidden while they figure out what to do they bury her alive in a makeshift coffin with an air tube.

The major subplot of the movie focuses on a young mute boy who sees them bury Candy alive. He tries to tell his parents but they're too caught up trying to impress the man's boss with whom they're going to have dinner with that night. The dinner seems to go okay until the boss tries to talk with the little boy. When his parents tell him the boy is mute the boss breaks out in uproarious laughter. If that's not bad enough, the parents relentlessly shout at the boy for this on the way home!. They were clearly upset and felt embarrassed somehow.

This message of how parents evils either destroy (or usually corrupt) their children is a bit heavy handed at times. Not only are we reminded of it with Candy's situation (her stepfather scum and her mother drinks to avoid the situation at hand) and the young mute boy, but it is also showed that Alan and Jessie were the product of an abusive upbringing. But still I really enjoyed this flick, it gives off a very realistic vibe of three desperate people looking to make it big off of poor Candy. And Candy spends most of the flick bound and gagged in a Catholic Schoolgirl uniform which is kind of humorous but in a dark and sadistic kind of way. The thieves have a hard time keeping their hands off of her. Tiffany Bolling in my honest opinion was a real standout as the hot kidnapper who tries to keep the boys in line and sometimes has to suffer their abuse. Overall The Candy Snatchers is a pretty good crime flick. It's a little sleazy, a little harsh and all around exploitative. If you like these kind of films then you should definitely check it out.

I didn't like it. I've read dozens of reviews talking about this being a "brutal" "gritty" "exploitation classic", etc., but it's boring. I'm over here preparing to get blown away but instead I could barely stay awake.

Three dorks - one being a female dork - kidnap a "teenage" girl and demand her jeweler father to pay them in diamonds. Catch is the father could care less, so to show that they mean business the kidnappers tell him they're going to cut off the girl's ear. Naturally they're too weak stomached to do such a thing so they go to the hospital and pay a guy 50 bucks to cut the ear off a blinking corpse.

Things just go on and on like this until the exciting end...exciting cause I could finally turn it off.

Two minor topless scenes, including one from a bad angle.

Capt.Freaky here to describe yet another failed purchase of mine...first and foremost, this is the third title from Subversive Cinema that would not play in my $700 Philips DVD player! I had to watch it on my computer's DVD player!

Beyond that inconvenience...this film didn't come close to living up to its box cover! I expected some serious punishment to the kidnapped girl...instead you see her breast once for about 5 seconds while she is getting sexed up by a guy who is a lame actor!

Again....the whole purpose of making these kinds of films is to sexually excite the customers who watch them. This film is about as boring as it can get. No sexual tension whatsoever...the acting was typical "B" picture stuff...the musical background was straight out of a Karl Malden bad TV show! I think if ZERO stars were possible...I would have rated this film a ZERO!

Its such a big disappointment when something so promising turns out to be nothing better than a PG-13 rated bad film on Cinemax! Just to show you the deception this film company had when they packaged this thing...there is no rating anywhere on the outside of the case....but as it turns out...its a "R" rated film. Probably because you see a boob or two here and there....

This movie will keep your pole flat in your pants and leave your girlfriend dry as Las Vegas in August....