1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An excellent evaluation of the evidence, January 26, 2010
This review is from: The Canning wonder (Hardcover)
I have read several books on the case of Elizabeth Canning, an eighteenth century serving girl who disappeared for 28 days in January 1753. Two women were brought to trial and found guilty of holding her prisoner and stealing her stays; the latter was the capital offense. Further investigation caused the women to be released; Elizabeth Canning was convicted of perjury and transported to the United States. She never explained where she had been. The case caused an enormous fervor at the time, and at least four books were written on the case in the twentieth century debating the truth of the matter.
Machen makes no bones about his opinion: "Elizabeth Canning was an infernal liar." Of the books that I have read, Machen does the best job of carefully examining the evidence and testimony offered at various times. He throws out possibilities of what EC might actually have been up to, but emphasizes that we will never really know. Machen's habit of interlacing quotations from testimony, Britishism, and allusions that may have been more obvious in the 1920s occasionally makes the book a little difficult to read, at least for this American reader, but I would consider it essential for anyone pondering the case. For balance and an emphasis on different issues, I recommend Judith Moore's
The Appearance of Truth: The Story of Elizabeth Canning and Eighteenth-Century Narrative, which is as biased for Canning as this is biased against her.
Treherne reaches conclusions similar to Machen, although he is not as methodical in his analysis. His book,
The Canning Enigma, does offer a better narrative of surrounding events, and he reviews the conclusions of other authors, so it is a good additional source. Lillian de la Torre's
'Elizabeth is missing';: Or, Truth triumphant: an eighteenth century mystery. being a true and complete relation of her mysterious disappearance indulges in rather wild speculation, but offers the interesting alternative explanation that EC was suffering from hysterical amnesia, and her misstatements were caused by confusion, rather than deliberate lies.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No