Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
This lens hood fits the following Canon lenses:
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
57 of 59 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Here's the hood missing from your lens box...,
By Deluxe (worldwide) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Canon ET-65B Lens Hood for EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 IS and DO IS USM Lenses (Electronics)
4 stars because it's $40 for a piece of plastic that should have been included with both of its intended lenses.Shame on your cheap ways, Canon!
32 of 34 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Pros and Cons,
By
This review is from: Canon ET-65B Lens Hood for EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 IS and DO IS USM Lenses (Electronics)
Pros:- Reduces flare and ghosting when shooting in bright light. - Helps protect your lens from dirt and scratches. - Somewhat protects the lens in case of a fall. Better to break the hood than the front element. - Makes you look more like you know what you are doing and helps keep others from carelessly walking in front of you. Cons: - Will increase lens movement in windy situations, kind of like a sail on a boat. - Takes up more room in your bag, even when reversed they still add to the diameter of the lens. - People take more notice of you, will help to blow your cover if you are trying to keep a low profile.
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Good design, bad materials,
By
This review is from: Canon ET-65B Lens Hood for EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 IS and DO IS USM Lenses (Electronics)
I was deeply dissapointed in this lens hood. Given that the cost is about 10% of the cost of the lens for which it was intended (the 70-300 IS in this case) I expected it to be of stiff durable polycarbonate.-Positives- fulfills the basic function of a lens hood- prevents flare, etc. The bayonet locking system is excellent, much easier to deal with than scew-on type lens hoods. that's about it. -Negatives- The polycarbonate is so thin I half expect it to be translucent. The hood must be gripped by the base to remove it, as grippng the thin end of the hood may break it; or at least it feels like it may break it. Its very long. Especially on the 70-300 which is already a long lens, this makes a fully extended zoom about a foot long. That's pretty conspicuous. It's very overpriced vs. generic lenses ($50 vs. $5-10 for rubber or metal). I traded it in and went with a kalt rubber lens hood. 2 stars for the great bayonet design, but the rest of it is weak.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|