Most Helpful Customer Reviews
57 of 59 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Here's the hood missing from your lens box..., January 15, 2006
This review is from: Canon ET-65B Lens Hood for EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 IS and DO IS USM Lenses (Electronics)
4 stars because it's $40 for a piece of plastic that should have been included with both of its intended lenses.
Shame on your cheap ways, Canon!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
32 of 34 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Pros and Cons, May 10, 2006
This review is from: Canon ET-65B Lens Hood for EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 IS and DO IS USM Lenses (Electronics)
Pros:
- Reduces flare and ghosting when shooting in bright light.
- Helps protect your lens from dirt and scratches.
- Somewhat protects the lens in case of a fall. Better to break the hood than the front element.
- Makes you look more like you know what you are doing and helps keep others from carelessly walking in front of you.
Cons:
- Will increase lens movement in windy situations, kind of like a sail on a boat.
- Takes up more room in your bag, even when reversed they still add to the diameter of the lens.
- People take more notice of you, will help to blow your cover if you are trying to keep a low profile.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Good design, bad materials, October 20, 2006
This review is from: Canon ET-65B Lens Hood for EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 IS and DO IS USM Lenses (Electronics)
I was deeply dissapointed in this lens hood. Given that the cost is about 10% of the cost of the lens for which it was intended (the 70-300 IS in this case) I expected it to be of stiff durable polycarbonate.
-Positives-
fulfills the basic function of a lens hood- prevents flare, etc.
The bayonet locking system is excellent, much easier to deal with than scew-on type lens hoods.
that's about it.
-Negatives-
The polycarbonate is so thin I half expect it to be translucent.
The hood must be gripped by the base to remove it, as grippng the thin end of the hood may break it; or at least it feels like it may break it.
Its very long. Especially on the 70-300 which is already a long lens, this makes a fully extended zoom about a foot long. That's pretty conspicuous.
It's very overpriced vs. generic lenses ($50 vs. $5-10 for rubber or metal).
I traded it in and went with a kalt rubber lens hood. 2 stars for the great bayonet design, but the rest of it is weak.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|