Customer Reviews

Canon CanoScan 4200F Flatbed Scanner

5 star:		(45)
4 star:		(34)
3 star:		(3)
2 star:		(5)
1 star:		(10)

 

 

I simply love the Canon CanoScan 4200F flat scanner for prints and films. It's fast (both in scanning and transfering to the PC), quiet, and has superb scan quality, esp. on 35mm negatives. (I haven't tried scanning 35mm slide films.)

Setting the 4200F up is pretty much a breeze, assuming you have Windows XP. (Windows 98 users will need to follow the instructions very carefully.) You first install the software -- the scanner driver and the scan toolbar (called "toolbox") are the only programs necessary for using the scanner; the other applications (photo editing, OCR and Adobe Acrobat) are optional. After restarting your machine (so the scanner driver loads and runs as a service), just connect the USB 2.0 hi-speed cable, and you are set to go.

Using the scanner is also quite simple. You can scan in three ways: directly from your photo organizing or editing program (assuming it supports the universal TWAIN interface, which most imaging programs worth their pennies do); using the Canon Scan Toolbox; or pressing one of the four buttons on the scanner itself, which calls up the toolbox and automatically initiates a scan.

The four buttons are:

- Copy. Your PC must be connected to a powered-on printer for this to work. When you press copy, the Canon scans and sends the file directly to your printer.

- Scan. This is the button for scanning. When you press it, the Canon scans and sends the scanned image to your designated photo editing program, which you specify once via the toolbox. (This button corresponds to the "Scan 1" icon on the toolbox.)

- PDF. This turns the scanned image into a PDF file.

- E-mail. This button scans and then calls up Outlook Express or Outlook with the image embedded as a JPEG attachment.

The toolbox (toolbar) has more options for scanning. All are pretty straightforward. Each option can be configured in detail, or you can specify that all the settings be done in the driver itself. (The toolbox is simply an interface to the driver.) If you configure things in the driver, you'll even be able to adjust how the scanned image should look, in terms of color, contrast, sharpness, etc., etc. The options are endless, but in the beginning, using the toolbox makes scanning a breeze and less intimidating.

One thing cool about the Canon is how it makes it easy to understand what resolution you should scan in. First, the 4200F is capable of 3200x6400 dpi (dots per inch). The 3200 dpi is its true optical resolution; that's how much fine details it can detect. The second number, 6400 dpi, refers to its "stepping" levels, which basically means the sensor can sample each inch 6400 times, but only detects up to 3200 dots. When you scan, the Canon asks you what *output* resolution and size you want, and then calculates the necessary input resolution for you. Say you are scanning a 4x6" photo but want to be able to print it 4 times as large (or twice the width and length, i.e., 8x12") and print at 300 dpi. The Canon will then automatically set the correct scan resolution of 600 dpi -- which is twice as much as printing 4x6 at 300 dpi. So you'll get a 2400x3600 file in pixels, which can then be printed at 8x12" at 300 dpi (2400/8=3600/12=300dpi). This concept of specifying output resolution rather than worrying about input resolution works esp. well for scanning negatives. Say you are scanning a 35mm negative. It'd be a pain to figure out which scanning resolution is best. But if you know you'd eventually want to print a 4x6" photo in 200 dpi, just tell the driver so, and the driver will do all the work for you and scan properly.

Another feature I love is multi-scan, which lets you scan in several pictures at once and the driver automatically separates them. Here's how I use my 4200F:

I set up the scan button so it's linked to Adobe Photoshop Elements 3's organizer. (You can link the button to any TWAIN-compatible program.) When I press the button, the scanner automatically scans multiple pictures I place on the glass, and separates them (and straightens them if necessary) into individual pictures. I have a checkbox called "confirmation of EXIF" checked, which allows me an opportunity to scan in more pictures before sending them all at once to Photoshop Elements 3. This really saves me a lot of time, without having to switch between the scanner driver and Photoshop Elements after each scan. Finally, when I'm done with scanning all the photos, I click the Forward button, and the driver automatically launches Adobe Photoshop Elements (if it's not already open) or switches to it, and sends over the newly scanned pictures. This process works equally well for photo prints and negatives. It sounds longer than it actually is. As with any scanning, it's replacing the photos on the glass or in the negative holder that is the most time-consuming part.

Compared to my previous scanners and even many more expensive scannesr on the market today, the CanoScan 4200F is lightyears ahead in scan quality, speed and quietness. The driver software has both a "simple mode" for easy scanning and an "advanced mode" for more fine-tuned scanning. The driver has been totally stable. I simply love this scanner. Finally, I will be able to scan in all my old photos.

The only downside I can think of is the lack of a printed user's manual. The 4200F comes with a quick-start guide that covers installing the software and doing a test scan. The HTML user's guide has lots of details, but because it's not PDF, it's almost impossible to print out.

I love the image quality on the scans. Scans of negatives are excellent (although I can't compare to a true film scanner). Scans of photos are great, too. Compared to the Epson 4180 I returned, image quality of negatives is MUCH better on the Canon.

The software was easy to install on my Windows XP computer.

However, I've had some annoyances with this scanner. I still give it 5 stars because image quality is my priority, and I don't do a high volume of scanning.

* I had to return 2 scanners because of particles under the glass. If you look closely, you can see some "ferning" patterns and white dots near the top of the glass where the light rests (in the EXACT same place on both scanners!). Canon says they apply an anti-glare coating to the underside of the glass which may look foggy or hazy. I'm not sure what happened with my first 2 scanners, but the 3rd has no artifacts under the glass.

* The cover for the film scanning light is a flimsy paper thing. As well, you cannot scan many negatives at once. If you scan a good quantity of film, this would be bad. For me, it's not much of an issue.

* No driver for Macs.

* So-so photo-editing software. Again not an issue for me since I already have great software.

I had been thinking of getting a dedicated 35 mm film scanner for several years but was put off by the price and that fact that those types of scanners do only one thing - scan film. So my expectations were exceeded when I hooked up my new CanoScan 4200 last night and scanned a slew of old negatives and found most of the results to be excellent. I don't have a professional film scanner available to compare to, but I believe that the quality of these scans to be more than adequate for the kinds of photos that most regular people take. ( I would call myself a "serious amateur.") I am certain that the prints I get from these scans will be far better than the original, aging prints which had previously been all I had to look at, so in this alone the CanoScan will have fulfilled its mission as far as I'm concerned. I had tried to scan film with my previous flatbed scanner (which was not designed to accept film) with poor results, so I had pretty low expectations for this item at such a low price, but I was very pleasantly surprised. My only gripe is that when previewing the scan, the interface seems to want to automatically adjust the level of brightness of the preview, causing it sometimes to be completely black or completely white, and I can't figure out a way to turn this off. But I don't think this auto level feature affects the final scan when you have the automatic settings turned off. I found the metal (?) film holder to be well-designed and reasonably easy to use, but don't expect fast, effortless scans - you have to handle and load the film carefully, and a hi-res scan can take a couple of minutes. The maximum resolution of 3200 dpi generates large, clear jpg files for a typical 35 mm photo, on the order of about 4000 x 3000 pixels, which is plenty good for a 8 x 10 print. This is my fourth scanner in ten years and it is by far the best, so if your scanner is a few years old, quit wasting your time and get this scanner!

I bought this scanner as a gift for my Mom who has boxes full of slides from her Dad, but didn't know what to do with them. I helped her set up the scanner and start scanning them, and the results are impressive. (We installed this on her AMD Duron 900 system with USB 1.1 ports. One day later, I installed a USB 2.0 card for her, and the scans are significantly faster.) We scanned negatives and slides and the results were excellent. The software works quite well, and the media autodetection works great. Mom pops two slides in, hits the scan button, and comes back a few moments later and pops two more in. The software crops the scan, drops it on the hard drive under My Pictures, and doesn't require any user intervention. I will probably buy one of these for myself once my old Canon CanoScan FB620U dies!

This scanner works very well, is very fast, and comes with pretty decent software.

My one complaint: the claim of 3200dpi is misleading. 3200dpi scanning is ONLY available for FILM NEGATIVES; platen scanning maxes out at 1600dpi.

Although I love my Canon LiDE80 scanner, it will not scan 35mm slides, so I ordered a CanonScan 4200f. For documents, this scanner seems just as fast as the LiDE80--which is high praise. For film (35mm negatives or mounted slides), the scanning process is m---u---c---h slower, but effective nevertheless. The integrated film holder will take a 4-frame 35mm film strip or 2 mounted 35mm slides (even glass mounts!) and it's possible to scan all of the frames or slides in a single operation, though not in a single scanning pass.

The 4200f is driven by one of Canon's typically excellent interface programs and this one offers PDF image scanning in addition to the typical options.

Some reviewers have complained about the 4200f's "paper" or "paper-like" film scanner cover. These folks need some material recognition training: the cover in question is made of light, strong plastic, not paper. It seems very sturdy to me.

I've docked this unit one star only because of its slow film scanning speed.

The product is easy to use and the scan quality is good. I haven't tried scanning in film yet, but having the feature is a plus. I purchased this scanner a few months ago and used it a few times and was initially very pleased. Then all of the sudden something failed and the scanner would not communicate with my computer and eventually the power failed on the unit. In the interim, I spent a good deal of time, uninstalling & reinstalling the software and driver in an attempt to fix the issue. I went to the Canon website and tried to troubleshoot, without success. When I called Canon, they were very helpful and shipped out a new replacement within two days, along with a prepaid label to return the damaged scanner.

I am very happy with this scanner. It is actually a refreshing experience. I bought an hp about a year ago and it immediately crashed my computer.

Since then I was wary of buying another scanner, but finally broke down and decided to try this one because I needed it for my freelance cartooning work and the price was right. I needed something to scan black ink lines (sometimes very thin or textured) accurately and smoothly. This little scanner did the trick. I've only had it for a couple months and it does what I need.

The software is easy to use and the set up is simple.

The scanning is a bit slow (waiting for it to warm up the light then scan), but I can certainly live with that seeing how much easier this thing has made my work.

I've scanned color photos as well and it seemed to work with that too. Sometimes I use photos for different projects, but so far I havent scanned photos for serious work. So that is still somewhat untested. But for just scanning holiday snaps to email or whatever, it works just fine.

Conclusion: So far so good! Best scanner I've had (and that includes another ridiculous and more expensive hp that I have at the office)...

Just bought this scanner and tested it with text, photo, film, and slide. It did an amazingly good job on all. The bundled software worked great. OCR handled text great. Installation was super easy on XP pro machine (install software and hook up scanner -- ready to go!). No hassles. Looks great too. It's a low cost scanner (had been looking at a more expensive one but decided to save money). This scanner performs beyond my expectations.

I just got this scanner recently and I love it. I bought it exclusively because it would do good (3200 dpi) scans of slides. I have been waiting for a good slide scanner at a cheap price. I am quite satisfied. I was able to scan about 50 slides in about 1.5 hours (including figuring out the software the first time.)

This is not a super-precision type scanner; but then it costs orders of magnitude less than that kind of scanner. For quick, decent (PLENTY good for web use) scans of slides, this is a great scanner.

It's fast (as fast as any other scanner I've used). It does a very nice job on slides, good for any use except perhaps making large prints from the scans (haven't tried any printing yet.) The slide and film scanning is done with the light source behind the slide/film. The carrier holds two slides and is easy to use. You can scan two slides each time. It's pretty quick. It outputs to jpeg. The unit is small, couldn't be much smaller. It scans direct to email, jpeg, .pdf, does OCR and the lid accomodates books. Canon has done their design homework.

File size using the "flexible" scan size is about 2MB for a slide. If you afterward open the jpeg in a photo program and resize to around 1000 X 660 and save using "medium" quality jpeg, the file size is 100K to 160K and plenty good for web use.

I have done some regular 8-1/2 X 11 scans to .pdf and they look great. Quick, easy, direct to .pdf.

I really love this scanner -- and for only $89!

[I have a Dell PC, running Win XP Professional, 256 RAM, 160GB HD, 2.5 GHz clock speed. Everything functions well.]