1 new from $149.00

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Canon Heavy Weight Coated Paper (6646A008AA)

by Canon
5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Available from these sellers.
  • Enter your model number above to make sure this fits.
  • Size - 17" x 130 ft
  • Paper_Colors - White
  • Paper_Weight - 7 mil
  • Rolls_Per_Unit - 1
1 new from $149.00

Product Description

Matte surface produces no glare and provides pleasing color saturation. Thick enough to resist bleed-through and cockle under heavy ink loads. Ideal for check prints, presentations, microfilming, pen plotting and imposition proofs. For use with large format inkjet printers. Size: 17amp;quot; x 130 ft Paper Colors: White Paper Weight: 7 mil.

Product Information

Technical Details

Brand Name Canon
Item Weight 5.5 pounds
Product Dimensions 26.5 x 5.5 x 53.1 inches
Item model number 6646A008AA
Number of Items 1
Size 17" x 130 ft
Sheet Size see description
Paper Finish Matte
Manufacturer Part Number 6646A008AA

Additional Information

Customer Reviews
5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

5 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #866,180 in Office Products (See top 100)
#530 in Office Products > Office Supplies > Paper > Business Paper Products > Wide-format Paper
Shipping Weight 6.8 pounds
Domestic Shipping This item is also available for shipping to select countries outside the U.S.
International Shipping This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
Date First Available July 7, 2004

Customer Reviews

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
This item was purchased to calibrate the Canon printer at my place of employment. It worked perfect for doing the printers built in calibration. This is essential for making the factory ICC profiles work correct. Once done it did improve the color accuracy of the printer. As a paper it is a good quality paper for POP/POS type prints.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse