Customer Reviews

Canon PowerShot G2 4MP Digital Camera w/ 3x Optical Zoom

5 star:		(128)
4 star:		(20)
3 star:		(5)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(3)

 

 

The Canon PowerShot G2 is a digital camera consumer's dream come true, and a nightmare for other digital camera manufacturers.

Make a list of features you'd expect and not expect to find from a "prosumer" digital camera, and chances are you'll find them on the G2. This is a little camera that was designed to act a lot bigger than many other digital cameras in its class.

You only have to pick up a G2 to realize that there's a lot more to it than meets the eye; this camera's significantly heavier and feels sturdier than any other camera in its class! The extra weight means better camera stabilization. The G2's sturdiness inspires confidence and makes the camera feel like a photographic tool, not an electronic gizmo.

From the tilt-and-swivel LCD, the magnification loupe for manual focusing, dedicated and fully functional flash hot-shoe, evaluative metering, IR autofocous assist mechanism, ISO 50, RAW image format, etc., etc., this camera has it all!.

Many photographers will argue that the real measures of any camera lie in the controls and results. The G2 doesn't disappoint in either of these respects. Although you'll have to familiarize yourself with the camera's controls initially, you'll soon find them very intuitive and actually use them more often than not.

The quality of images captured with the G2 is nothing short of superb! You'll get clean, detailed, very high-resolution photographs with the G2, especially if you use the camera's RAW mode at ISO 50.

The Canon PowerShot G2 is still a point-and-shoot digital camera. Anyone who's ever used an SLR will miss the optical viewfinder, true manual focus, and lens selection not available in the G2. However, this can be said for any other digital camera in the G2's class. In every other respect, the G2 rises above its inherent limitations and really challenges its competition to try and keep up!

Beyond the camera itself, Canon has really done the consumer proud by offering most every accessory that you would want included at no extra charge, i.e. an remote control unit, high-capacity rechargeable Lithium Ion battery, and remote capture software.

If you're in the market for a capable digital camera at a reasonable price, thank Canon for making the choice really very simple.

Positives:
- extensive feature set
- excellent build and design
- superb results, especially in RAW mode at ISO 50
- Excellent lens produces very little distortion and chromatic aberrations
- extremely reasonable price
- All the accessories that should come standard do come standard.

Negatives:
- Certain exposure adjustments, i.e. flash compensation, aren't available in full manual mode.
- The fact that the G2 isn't an SLR.
- Not much else.

I consider myself an advanced amateur photographer. I own a Minolta 3xi SLR, and this Canon G2 is my first digital camera. I have done extensive research on 3MP to 4MP digital camera. The final candidates are: Olympus C-4040Z, Canon G2, with G2 being the winner.

Things I like about G2 (from personal experience):
- swivel LCD very useful in quite a lot of situations.
- swivel LCD protects LCD when not in use.
- long battery life. I have bought an extra battery just in case, but I have never used it so far (I have been using G2 for more than 3 months now). On average, I can use one charge for about 200 shots, with 50% of shots taken with flash; or > 300 shots on normal usage. I think I will use the extra battery when I go on travelling...
- manual focus magnifies the subject, thus allowing easy and accurate focusing.
- ability to show 9 thumnails at a time, and ability to let you jump 9 photos forward/backward at a time.
- remote control comes very handy. The downside is: I always forget to turn on the remote control feature on the G2, and I wonder why my remote control is not working... I wish future cameras will allow use of remote control, without having user to remember to turn on/off the remote control feature everytime he wishes to use it.
- G2 normally produces good and sharp photograph.

Things I dislike about G2:
- slow to focus: causing me to miss many great photos.
- unable to auto focus: the camera could not auto focus during night time even with street light. The G2's light assist does not help much and is of little to no use. Fortunately, manual focus is available. On another situation, I cannot auto focus on subjects are close (less than 1.5 foot) to the camera.
- video recording has max time limit of 30 seconds. This is useful for short clips, but generally videos require much longer than 30 seconds block. Note: Olympus C-4040Z has no video time limit.
- unable to zoom in or out after you have started video recording. However, you can zoom in or out before starting a video session.
- flash insufficient. When taking indoor pictures, flash assisted photos will look artificial, and gives you a feel that there is insufficient light (i.e. subject too bright, background too dark). I have read that adding an external flash will solve this problem, although I have never tried it. In the meantime, I use Night mode to compensate for this artificial lighting. With Night mode, your photo will look natural. The drawback is: the subject will need to stay still a little longer for the shot, so that there is more exposure for the darker areas. Unfortunately, my subjects do not always stay as long as I want them to.
- auto stitching does not work very well. Initially, I was impressed by auto-stitching. But upon further examination, I find that the stitching is done correctly only on certain parts of the photo. For example, auto-stitch is done correctly at the bottom half joining two pictures, but somehow auto-stitch did not stitch the top half correctly (i.e. top half is misaligned). In all, I would give auto-stitching a B- to C+ grade.
- photos taken tend to be more magenta in color. Fortunately, I can resolve this by setting Saturation level to Low (from Normal).
- noise found in higher ISO. Generally, G2 produces good quality photo at ISO 50 or ISO 100. I do not recommend using any ISO higher than 100 since I experience a lot of noise at these higher ISO.

Summary of main points: G2 is an above average digital camera for an advanced amateur, with many bells and whistles to play with. 3x zoom might be a little too small, but sufficient for most shots. Main problems of camera are slow focusing and sometimes inability to focus. Strengths of G2 are swivelling LCD and sharpness. Considering its price, it gives good value for money, but there is much room for improvement.

Note: You will definitely need a 128MB CF card. 32MB just isn't enough for a 4MP camera.

I've had my G2 for about 3 weeks and (thanks to a Big Event) had the opportunity to pump several hundred images into it over a four day period. Once I got used to it, I found it to be a very satisfying replacement for other cameras I've used (SLRs, digital video as replacement for still camera, point and shoot compacts).

I especially enjoy taking candids in available light, and this is the first compact camera I've used that actually lets me do this effectively. This is because I have reliable control over the flash and I can review pictures taken in questionable light to see if they worked or not.

I also used the G2 on a tripod to make a photographic copy of a large family oil painting, and the results were about what I'd expect from typical 35mm film in the hands of a casual user. I used the "remote capture" mode with a laptop, and must say that this mode works, but not as smoothly as you might expect.

When using available light, I admit I'm disappointed that the ISO setting maxes out at 400, but in my experience that's usually been enough, especially with an f2.0 lens, and the G2 can generally provide f2.0 (though you lose that maximum opening at longer focal lengths). The G2 gamely tries to take pictures even when the light is a bit too low, and it simply tries to warn you to hold the camera extra-steady.

The low-light picture results were comparable to what I achieved with film - some sharp, some blurry, some grainy, often depending on the quality of the lighting. The level of detail I achieved in my JPEGs was comparable to what I'd seen under similar conditions with a good film camera.

I often ran the G2 in "slow motor drive" mode since this would allow you to take several pictures in a row. Otherwise the camera would pause dramatically between shots as it pushed the previous image onto the compact flash card. In a sense, this was the biggest adjustment I had to make to this camera -- its computer would occasionally go off and do things, leaving the camera insensible to my need to take a picture, and I'd have to wait a second or two for it to catch up with me. The motor drive mode helped minimize this problem.

Of course, the digital camera, and the G2 in particular, carries benefits that were only fantasies in the world of film. I installed a 256K CF card, and the thing held HUNDREDS of pictures! And even though I overused the motor drive setting, I could go back and discard the less interesting pictures WITHOUT WASTING FILM. So by the end of my 4-day event, I had already edited out many of the less promising pictures I'd taken.

Another G2 shortcoming is that there's no way to change the orientation of a picture stored on the CF card. Even if you tell the camera which way to orient a picture (there's a menu entry), you lose that information if you simply copy the picture off of the CF card. I found that surprising. (For that matter, today's smart camera ought to sense which way is up, and store the image appropriately.)

In closing, let me comment on battery usage. I bought a second battery and didn't start using it till the THIRD DAY of shooting! Note that I mostly relied on the viewfinder, and rarely used the flash. But I regularly used the LCD to review and edit the pictures I'd taken. I never plugged in the camera during the entire four days, since I'd already charged up the other battery. So you can push A LOT of pictures through a single battery charge.

Plusses: the benefits of digital technology, film-like resolution, lots of control, a relatively fast lens, a usable viewfinder, awesome battery life.

Minuses: ISO tops off at 400, the camera's computer can be slow, and you must use separate editing software to orient pictures. But I suspect the G2 is comparable, if not better, than most other digital cameras in these respects.

After months of exhaustive searching, I finally decided to purchase the Canon Powershot G2 (it's a wonderfully re-designed upgrade to the Powershot G1). The clarity of the images that this camera takes is spectacular. Combine that with the list of outstanding features that aren't included on any other digital camera: ISO 50, RAW image capture, a flip out LCD screen (which is much more handy than you would think), an infrared remote for long exposures and self-portraits, and easy menu functions -- this camera is without equal in it's price range.

It's definitely not for the beginner, but, if you're familiar with photography, you'll be able to take sharp, beautiful pictures with this camera. Skin tones are perfect and the built in flash with exposure compensation does a good job for portraits. And, if you're considering a Sony, this camera uses the more inexpensive Compact Flash memory storage system. Compact Flash memory cards are cheaper than the Sony Memory Stick and are compatible with more peripherals than Memory Stick.

All in all, if it's in your price range, you will be very pleased with the Canon Powershot G2.

After working with this camera at the store at which I am employed, I have come to the conclusion that all around, this is the best high-end consumer grade digital camera. There are several ways in which this camera comes out on top over the cameras made by its competitors.

More than likely, the camera people will compare this to is the Nikon Coolpix 995--at least these are the two cameras most people narrow it down to. Each camera offers things that the other doesn't, but I find the Canon is superior in several ways.

1. The Canon is *far* more user friendly. The controls are laid out in a way that makes them easy to find. SLR users that are converting from film to digital will find the switch to be a little easier with the Canon. One thing I don't like about the Nikon is the way manual control works; hold down this button, move this switch, push down that button while moving that switch, etc etc. Way too complicated for the average consumer. On the Canon it's a breeze. Switch the control to "M" and the 4-way pad on the back up the camera controls aperture and shutter speed. That's it.

2. The Canon uses an anti-reflective coating on the screen. Nikon and Olympus *still* don't do that with their consumer grade cameras. The anti-reflective coating helps heaps when you're out in the sun, where the screens on most other cameras get faded out and are impossible to see.

3. The rechargable battery that comes with the Canon lasts far longer than other camera batteries (i.e. AA's or the rechargables Nikon uses). You could easily get over 200 shots from a single battery, with the LCD screen on.

4. The software package the Canon comes with blows away what Nikon and Olympus give you. Adobe Photoshop--the standard in the graphics industry.

5. The Canon comes with a 32 megabyte card, which is 2x what most manufacturers ship the camera with.

6. Two words -- hot shoe. Right on the camera. Who wants to carry around a bulky flash bracket when you can buy a camera that a standard flash attaches right to?

If you've read reviews from computer magazines or from digital camera websites, you'll see that the Canon gets consistently high reviews. In a recent review, the G2 was rated #1 over the Coolpix 995, which the reviewers claimed produced pictures which weren't quite as sharp as the ones from the G2. I've been waiting to buy a digital camera. When I have the means, I am very confident this is the one I'll go with.

The Canon PowerShot G2 is, hands down, the finest compact, high-end, amateur/professional digital camera on the market today. Together with the lens adapter, the teleconverter (1.5x) and wide-angle lens available, it simply can't be beat. Before I purchased this camera I spent several hours personally comparing it to every other 3+ megapixel camera currently on the market, and there is simply no comparison with any other. I would not pretend to compare this camera to the Canon EOS D30 and the even newer D30x with it's use of interchangeable, incomparable EF lenses, but photography, not simply digital photography just leaped another millennium with Canon's improvements over the 1-year old PowerShot G1.

The Product Review and other personal review at this site have provided you more of the technical aspects of this jewel, so I will spare any repetition--except to say that the ability to use my 550EX flash normally used with my Canon EOS-3 and 1v is not only teriffic but a great money saver.

Don't be fooled by the stylish looks of other digitals--not that they are slackards by any means (such as the Dimage 7), but it's performance, although outstanding, seems elementary alongside the G2.

ENOUGH SAID!

This is my first Canon camera and now I know what Canon fans have been raving about all these years. This is a well-built, well-designed, and well-executed digital camera. It certainly is intended for a advanced user or "prosumer," but I believe it can also serve as a good camera for a beginner who knows he or she will advance in skill.

Most beginners buy a point and shoot camera and then upgrade to something more expensive if they "get into" photography. The G2 can work as a point and shooter. It has a fully automatic setting. And the pictures it takes are extraordinary. At 4 megapixels, they are as good as any amatuer user will ever need given the capability of home printers.

As you grow in confidence, and want to experiment with adjustments to shutter speeds, ISO, manual focus, etc., etc., it is all here and organized in a logical and accessible manner. The camera will even take short movies, though I doubt that feature is any more needed than the snapshot feature on digital camcorders.

You need to hold this camera to really appreciate how well built it is. So many digital cameras look and feel "cheap" even if they cost multiple hundreds of dollars. The G2 is solid and attractive.

I particularly enjoy the innovative LCD screen which flips out and rotates like those on camcorders. It also flips completely over for self-portraits (very convenient with the wireless remote) and can be turned toward the camera and snapped into place to protect the LCD from scratches while transporting.

I researched several cameras before I purchased the Canon G2. I don't regret my choice in the slightest. The G2 is more expensive than some, but it is so versatile that I expect I will actually save money because I can't think of a thing I might need as my skills advance that this camera won't provide.

This is a great camera for a budding digital photography enthusiast, somebody wanting a capable prosumer camera that you can "grow into". It is simple to use (in full auto mode), yet highly capable (full manual controls). I've done quite a bit of research into all the 3-4 Mega pixel cameras and I believe I had made the right choice in selecting the G2.

Some things I liked about this camera:
1. Great LCD display. I liked the capability of being able to close the lcd display, something other cameras didn't have.

2. Great batteries. The Li Ion batteries last a long time, and can be charged in camera, like a typical camcorder (very convenient).

3. Easy to use controls. The controls are intuitive and easy to learn. I was shooting away in no time.

4. Good software. I like the included Zoombrowser software that made it easy to organize and view your pictures.

5. Good manuals. Manuals are very informative and well-written.

6. Very low shutter lag. One problem with other digital cameras out there is the long shutter delay (delay from the time you press the shutter to the time the picture is taken). The Canon G2 is FAST!

7. Slew of features. It has a whole range of modes, starting from point-and-shoot automatic to full manual controls. I use primarily the "program AE" mode which is the point and shoot automatic mode, but with the capability of making exposure, flash intensity, and white balance mode changes. Great learning camera.

8. Excellent picture quality. Of course, all the above wouldn't amount to much if the camera yielded poor pictures. I'm very happy with my G2.

Two things that can be improved upon:
1. More optical zoom. The G2 has 3X.
2. Better flash.

However, the G2 has convenient connections for an external lens, and an external flash...

Like many folks out there, I've been looking at digital cameras for well over a year, but the technology and price haven't come together until recently. Honestly, I was looking at the Oly 4040 more seriously than this because it looked good on paper (specs). Do yourself a favor - go to a camera store and hold the cameras. Test drive them. The Canon was a no-brainer for me.
Compact Flash cards are a must. Fast and convenient. I picked up an additional 128mb card, and is well worth the investment. I also picked up the telephoto lens, but in reality, I don't use it much. Too awkward for the minimal gain. Don't bother with the digital telephoto - as with most other cameras, it's lame.
I've had this camera (G2) since October, and it is absolutely wonderful. I needed to send pictures in word documents via snail mail to my kid in the military. I can literally take a picture and have it imbedded in a word document (formatted too)in under 60 seconds.
Besides the ease of use, the pictures are on par with most 35mm shots. This has full EOS style programs, so it's very versatile and easy to setup. My friends and family are really impressed with the quality of the black and white and sepia photos it produces. I really like the auto-bracketing feature.
The LCD is very nice in all lighting conditions.
You can avoid the startup chime by starting the camera with the LCD closed, and open it after it wakes up.
I have saved just over 600 photos to date. Battery life is phenomenal. As in WOW! Excellent! I've charged twice (approximately 700 pics taken).
It's slightly heavy, which I like. Good feel to the camera (unlike others on the market).
I would also highly suggest that you get a CF card reader. I have a SimpleTech FlashLink, and like it a lot.
This camera is extremely easy to use.
Don't hesitate, this is a great camera. You won't regret it.

If you sort the reviews already available here by "Most Helpful", you'll notice that the technical features that made Powershot series a pain in the rear of Nikon/FujiFilm/Olympus are already well documented.

The bundled ancillaries (software, maintenance stuff etc) is unarguably the best on the market, period, the support for IBM's 1 GB microdrive (which Nikon did not have until recently), the hot shoe being right on the camera, the superb CanonScan software that makes it a cinch to get your snaps on your machine even for tech-phobic folk, the sturdier heavier body of the camera that makes it easier to balance, CP-10 card photo printer support, the new vivid color mode, the wireless remote control, the plethora of compatible flashes (Speedlite 220EX, 380EX, 420EX, and 550EX to be precise), the possibility of recording videos WITH sound up to 120 seconds, or 30 seconds in a larger frame size (Nikon wannabes note...until recently, Nikon did not support sound in videos) ...etc etc.

Yes, all of this is outstanding and even if you don't get most of it, YOU WILL BE SURPRISED eventually after you have used and discovered your G2 Powershot for while, when you find out why Canon was the best choice you could have made!

HOWEVER, amidst the celebration of all this doohickey one thing we often neglect to consider is the quality of the pictures themselves -- isn't THAT the main purpose of a camera, digital or otherwise? All the convenience in handling, maintaining and uploading wouldn't be worth jack if the pictures themselves looked better with another camera!

And in this important department of "quality", I have always wanted to compare G2 and Nikon's top comparable options (specifically 995, 4300 and 5700) because these are the only two brands that'll give you near-pro functionality and quality at consumer prices (apologies to FinePix/Olympus owners).

I had the luxury recently of trekking with friends who own Nikons 4300 and 995 respectively. Pretty much the ONLY thing I've found Nikon-freaks mentioning since the release of G2 is the oh-so-exalted Nikor lens because Canon beats Nikon hands-down in pretty much every other department as noted above. Me and my 2 friends are all more or less at a similar level of expertise with photography, none professional. But all have owned and worked with our camera for a while and read the manuals thin.

Here is what I believe after head-to-head comparisons, your mileage may vary --

OUTDOOR PICTURES IN BRIGHT LIGHT:
Canon's colors were more real. Clarity is good with all 3 cameras but Nikon seemed a little reddish to me.

PICTURES IN LOW LIGHTING (INDOOR OR NIGHT PICTURES):
This is where Canon where truly leave you in "shock and awe" (sorry for the choice of words). I was stunned with some of Canon's ultra-realistic pictures when only a candle was on in a room for example.

FIGURES/FACES OF PEOPLE:
Unfortunately, even with a lot of tweaking, Nikon is just simply better at faces of people for some reason. Canon is too, er, "real"? We agreed that with Nikon ...the colors, shades, contours of the same face can be made to look a little better than with Canon -- and I am excluding software based trickery of course.

DEFAULT MODE:
If you opt to use only the default modes in Canon and Nikon, then Nikon will win in terms of photo quality. Canon provides excellent detail and clarity, but the default mode has the now notorious "white specks" or dotted edges. This is easily taken care of with some adjustment (read the manual).

ALL IN ALL: I feel Canon's results are more "honest". It just captures the reality in every sense-- colors, the range of what your eyes see etc. This usually means it is better for me, but if my pictures were going to be mainly of people I would also give the Nikons a good look.

Otherwise, Canon G2 Powershot is the best there is. Even better than the new G3 (for now).