Sort: Most Helpful first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 220 questions
50mm f/1.4 vs. 85mm f/1.8: I'm debating between the two lenses... the 85mm is a bit more expensive, I'm just wondering if anyone with some experience with both has any comments to make? Oct 6, 2007
The 50mm f/1.4 doesn't offer enough of an image quality boost over the 50mm f/1.8 to justify buying it. The 85mm f/1.8 offers faster ring type USM focusing, the 50mm f/1.8 does not. The 85mm f/1.8 has a rich and creamy bokeh that is as good or better than the 50mm f/1.4. While still being a great traditional portrait lens, the extra reach of the 85m f/1.8, makes it great for concerts, plays, and gymnasium sports. I like to say the 85mm f/1.8 is the lens that every parent should own (and anyone who wants to sell photos to parents too).
Could some kind,patient person tell me how to get to the photo gallery that shows how pictures look taken with a specific lens?thx! Jul 26, 2013
I usually use this website http://www.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/?lens=16 You can filter the photos by camera model and lens model. I believe the source of the pictures are all from Flicker
Canon L lens vs. Prime Lens: Since prime lenses are known to produce very sharp images, but lacks the versatility of zoom, would Canon L zoom lens, say 24-70mm shot at 50mm, be comparable to their non L series 50mm prime lens??? Aug 9, 2010
The 50mm f/1.4 is sharper across all apertures; the two lenses are probably closest in sharpness at the 24-70's max of f/2.8, but by f/4 the 50mm f/1.4 is clearly in the lead. To further cement things, the light falloff of the 50mm f/1.4 is also clearly superior to the 24-70 f/2.8L, most visibly at larger apertures. Depending on your camera, this second item may not be a big issue; when EF-series lenses are used on APS-C sized sensors the pictures benefit from a reduced light falloff due to less of the image hitting the lens being captured by the sensor (the infamous "crop factor"). Link to 50mm f/1.4 to 24-70mm f/2.8L comparison: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=101&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp=115&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=4 (copy both lines of the address into your browser) So, that's the f/1.4, what about its little sibling, the 50mm f/1.8 II? The L glass does better against the "nifty fifty", but still loses in sharpness from f/4 through f/5.6; at f/2.8 and from f/8 to f/11 the two are about equal. The 50mm again benefits from reduced light falloff, but not as dramatically as the f/1.4. Link: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=101&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp=105&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=2 It really shouldn't be surprising that even L-series zooms can't stand up to prime lenses under certain conditions. Even the 50mm f/1.8 II, currently selling for barely $100, can get away with such prices because 1) the lens makes considerable sacrifices elsewhere (build quality, AF motor, lack of full-time manual focus, etc) 2) 50mm primes, in particular, were once the standard lens and so have had more research & development than just about any other fixed focal length and 3) it's vastly, vastly easier to design a fixed focal length prime lens than to make a complicated zoom, especially a fixed-aperture zoom, and a high-quality one at that, which the 24-70mm f/2.8L is. That's why the 24-70mm f/2.8L is currently $1350, the 50mm f/1.4 goes for $350 and the f/1.8 II for only $100. You get what you pay for. There are other things the L-series lens likely does better, such as color saturation and vividness; I haven't seen any website providing such comparisons online, and you asked specifically about sharpness, anyway. Think of it this way: zooms, even L-series, are by nature jacks-of-all-trades. The really expensive ones are really, really good. But they still have to make compromises in order to get the best image quality across the range of the zoom. The primes, meanwhile, are single-purpose lenses, so even the cheap ones can equal the performance of a zoom set to its focal length, while the mid-price ones can easily surpass it.
Whats the difference, except price, in this lens vs. Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras by Canon $1,619.00 Apr 24, 2014
There are a couple of differences, but the real question is what are your needs as a photographer? I'm guessing that since you are asking what the differences are between these lenses, your needs are not of the professional nature, but I don't want to assume. The F1.2 is a pro lens. It is a stop faster, has sharper optics, manual focus override with just a twist of the lens, and from what I've heard nicer bokeh. Generally Canon puts everything it has into its "L" lenses. Better optics, build quality, and finish. I do not own the F1.2. I don't need it. To quote a friend of mine that shoots models all day in L.A., "If someone hadn't stolen my F1.4, I would not have purchased the F1.2". For someone who shoots portrait and magazine covers all day and makes a living at it, the subtle differences of the F1.2 are worth the extra money. For someone like me, who shoots portraits on occasion or shots for web sites etc., the F1.4 is a wonderful lens. It's very fast, handles well, and produces great photos. Not to discount the F1.2; it is an amazing lens and if money were no object of course I would own it. Hope this helps. Happy shooting!
Can this lense be used with 1100D and will this be good choice for landscaping pics? My Kit already has 18-55mm and 55-250mm lense, any suggestions/tips be appreciated friends. I am beginner and much interested in photography? Dec 25, 2013
Any lens can be used for landscape as long as you have the proper distance. Last night I just shot a landscape with 70mm using a 70-200. I also shot landscapes with 300mm with 70-300. But definitely the 50mm can be used for landscapes but its strength really is taking photos in street and low-light. It's a good lens that allows you to be creative.
USM stands for Ultra Sonic Motor, basically it focuses very fast and quiet. If you've used the 1.8 version of this lens (not USM) you'll notice a huge improvement. The STM stands for Stepper Motor and this type of video was built with video in mind. On video the STM beats the USM by far in focusing speed (objects in motion, when you use it with a canon 70 which focuses automatically) and in focusing noise, STM are super silent.
I see it says it will be equivalent to an 80mm on the APS-C cameras. I have the 30D which I believe is a APS-C . So is this saying I can't have a 50m Jun 1, 2015
There is a lot of technicality behind that. Some would argue that you can't blankety say that crop factors changes the lens size. The mm factor is the amount of space between the lens and the sensor. So for example, if you were to compare an 85mm lens on a full frame to a 50mm on a crop your 85 mm will have a flatter field of view but the image size will be close to the same. There is more to a lens than just crop factor. The wider a lens is the more the image can seem warped so mm size has to be viewed differently than just by what your final size might be. Sorry that was a very technical response but hopefully a more accurate one.
Will this work with a Canon 70d? Mar 21, 2014
Yes. Any EF lens will fit a full-frame OR crop sensor. I don't buy EF-S lenses because they will ONLY fit crop sensors (30D, 40D, 50D, 60D, 70D, 7D). The 1, 5 and 6 series Canons all have full frame sensors and, since you may want to upgrade one day, stick with EF lenses so they'll fit whatever you've got. :-)
Macro Lens For Orchid Photography: Could someone recommend a lens for closeup shots of orchids? Sep 5, 2011
There are several really nice macro lenses for Canon bodies. If you have a crop sensor body (Canon Rebel, 20D, 7D, 60D, etc.) then the EF-s 60mm is a popular choice. Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM Digital SLR Lens for EOS Digital SLR Cameras. It is very lightweight but has a fairly short minimum focusing distance for 1:1 capture. It also makes a decent (not great like the Canon 85mm f1.8) portrait lens for a starter kit. For a bit more money the Canon 100mm f2.8 macro is a classic. Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. It has a longer minimum focus distance which helps let more light fall between you and the subject. For serious bang the Tamron 180mm macro is a real winner IMHO. It has still more distance for 1:1 focus which is really essential for insects and other small creatures that easily spook.... not really an issue with orchids but it also means less stooping. Tamron AF 180mm f/3.5 Di SP A/M FEC LD (IF) 1:1 Macro Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras. Whichever you choose consider the following: 1.)Light, light, and more light!!! Macro work has a narrow depth of field so small apertures are common. This resolves more detail but chokes off light. The on camera flash will often not cover the full frame if the distance is very close. For a starter light source check out the Opteka RL-12 macro ring light. Opteka RL-12 Digital Macro LED Ring Light for Canon EOS, Nikon, Sony Alpha, Olympus & Pentax Digital SLR Cameras It is very handy and very affordable. It has adapters included that work with any of the listed lenses (plus many others). 2.)Steady hands! Macro and telephoto work are quick to show even the slightest camera shake. A portable tripod is a great way to use longer shutter speeds and soak up more light and detail. There are so many choices on the market but the Vanguard Alta + 255CP carbon fiber tripod is a great starting point and currently priced at an unbelievable 175 bucks with a fantastic head included. It is strong, light weight, very stable and folds down to fit an overhead bag for flights. Vanguard Alta + 255CP Carbon Fiber 5-Section Tripod Leg Set with PH-32 Panhead and Tripod Case, Maximum Height 53-7/8", Supports 8.8 lbs. A remote shutter release for you specific camera is highly recommended as well. Use these in conjunction with the mirror lock-up function on your camera and get great shots with most any macro lens currently on the market. For what it's worth, I currently own all the equipment mentioned except the Canon 100mm macro (sold after going to Tamron 180mm) and can confidently vouch for the quality of everything listed. I hope this helps. Happy shooting!