Buy Used
$6.99
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by JSW Media
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Very good condition, NO writing or highlights. Eligible for Fast and Free Super Saving Shipping!
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

You Can't Enlarge The Pie The Psychology Of Ineffective Government Hardcover – August 15, 2001


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$3.98 $0.01

Frequently Bought Together

You Can't Enlarge The Pie The Psychology Of Ineffective Government + Negotiating Rationally
Buy the selected items together
  • Negotiating Rationally $12.19

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Basic Books (August 15, 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0465006310
  • ISBN-13: 978-0465006311
  • Product Dimensions: 9.6 x 6.4 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,659,612 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Bazerman (a Harvard professor of business administration), Baron (a University of Pennsylvania professor of psychology) and Shonk (a Harvard research associate) have a promising idea for improving government. Drawing on "an approach that now dominates the curriculum of business schools," they declare, "Our core argument is that large gains can often only be achieved when citizens learn to accept small losses in return" as with vaccines, which save far more lives than they cost in fatal side effects. The authors devote separate chapters to each of six cognitive barriers they claim prevent us from making such wise trade-offs. Some are clearly related to their main theme "do no harm" describes the rationale opposing vaccination; but others notably "competition is always good" require more elaboration, which is generally lacking. Furthermore, they sometimes criticize behavior in one chapter and praise or simply overlook it in another indicating a schematized approach that ignores crucial sources of policy-making difficulty. One chapter touts free trade between countries while another decries cities' ruinous competitive spending on sports arenas, without acknowledging a similar dynamic when labor, consumer and environmental laws are construed as "trade barriers." The authors' cognitive focus obscures genuine objective dilemmas, while their psychologizing is often implausible. They say campaign finance reform has low priority as an ill-defined "process issue" that people can't grasp because like most business negotiators they don't think ahead. But most citizens grasp political corruption, which seems similarly to be a "process issue." Despite some obviously promising ideas, the relentless reductionism oversimplifies and psychologizes problems that have complex, historical, real-world roots.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

About the Author

Max H. Bazerman is Jesse Isidor Straus Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School and lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Jonathan Baron is Professor of Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania and lives in Philadelphia.

A former editor at the Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Katherine Shonk is a research associate at Harvard Business School and lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.


More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Share your thoughts with other customers