2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Fantastic edition, June 10, 2010
This review is from: The Capture of Constantinople: The "Hystoria Constantinopolitana" of Gunther of Pairis (The Middle Ages Series) (Paperback)
Just for the record, I am reviewing the edition, not Gunther of Pairis as a historian. That sort of work is best left to academic journals, and frankly, due to the perishibility of ancient and medieval manuscripts, we are fortunate to have as many as we do.
Gunther of Pairis was a monk attached to the monastery of Pairis, which despite any phonetic similarities to the modern capital of France, was actually in the diocese of Basel, although it was a fair bit north of that city. Gunther's abbot, Martin, travelled with the Fourth Crusade and participated in the sacking of Constantinople, going so far as to make off with a whole score of relics. Due to the controversy surrounding "sacrum furtum", Gunther wrote this as an apologetic account on behalf of Martin. However, it is not just a simple defence of a relic thief, but a rather elaborate weaving together of high medieval monastic thought and literature. Andrea remarks on how long he spent studying the text after he figured that this would be a rather straight-forward translation. This is a highly complex document, with parts written in verse, and one that needs heavy contextualizing for it to be understood.
With that out of the way, I can get on to reviewing the edition, and I can say that it is superb. The translation is crisp and flows very well, and the first 60 pages of the book discuss Gunther of Pairis' life, his learning, the intellectual climate fostered by Citeaux and the value of this work as history. This introduction goes a long way towards giving the reader a good understanding of the text, and it is very clear that Andrea knows what he is talking about. I was initially disappointed that there was no Latin text attached, especially since Andrea said that he had explored all of the relevant manuscripts, but he notes later on that a new Latin critical edition had just been released before the publication, of this book, so I see no need for there to be another one, as it would just be superfluous. The middle 70 pages of the book make up the text, and this is where my sole criticism lies and the reason that I have only given this book four stars. It is followed by 50 pages of endnotes. These notes are excellent and provide a lot of insight into the text. The problem is that each and every page of the text references several of these endnotes, and it becomes very tiresome to constantly flip back and forth. Had those notes been placed at the bottom of the page as footnotes, we would probably end up with something akin to Whitby's 'Chronicon Paschale' where 50% of the page space is devoted to notes, but at least they are in front of the reader.
In sum, this is an excellent translation. It has a fantastic introduction, is a very learned volume and has great notes. Its only flaw lies in the fact that the numerous and useful notes are confined to the back of the book, where they must be referenced constantly by flipping back and forth.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good stuff, May 25, 2001
This review is from: The Capture of Constantinople: The "Hystoria Constantinopolitana" of Gunther of Pairis (The Middle Ages Series) (Paperback)
The Capture of Constantinople is an interesting history of the disastrous and controversial Fourth Crusade. Written by the monk Gunther of Pairis, it tells of the sacking of Greek Orthodox Constantinople by the Roman Catholic crusaders, casting the abbot Martin of Pairis as a hero. (In reality, Martin was viewed in an ambiguous light for his theft of holy relics from Orthodox churches.) Gunther serves as a kind of apologist for his abbot. The text is engaging and easy to read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No