4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Nobody captures the feeling of alienation better then Clowes, April 30, 2004
The brilliance of Clowes comic strips can be found in his unique ability to capture that lonely, empty feeling of alienation that his characters so often convey drifting in and out of vapid 'Ghost Worlds.' Make no mistake about it, this book is brilliant and should be rated 5 stars if it weren't for the last 1/5 of it where we're offered 2 stories that suffer from a lack of narrative cohesion. The first 4/5's though, demonstrate Clowes at his finest by way of his beautiful artwork and razor-sharp writing filled with pathos, humour and cutting observation.
Not to be missed by fans of Clowes not to mention newcomers interested in getting a taste of his work.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Compelling 'Caricature' is haunting and unpretentious, May 10, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Caricature (Hardcover)
I’m confused that some can call Clowes’s style too “retro” and in a narrow vein that “only individuals sharing his neurosis could love”, but then turn around and fault his work as “post-modern [sic]” (a term too frequently mis-used to have any meaning) and “commercial”. These two statements contradict one another and cannot be taken seriously.
In surveying "comix nouveau" it is quite understandable why some naysayers might consider its writers -- and those “nerds” who scour every panel examining its meta-meta-theoretical undertones -- at the very least pretentious. I agree with many of these criticisms (as does Clowes - his "Lout Rampage" bundles the ignorant with the so-called intelligentcia).
Yet much of the backlash against the latest group of popular American writer-artists (such as Chris Ware, and some would argue [not Clowes!] Art Spiegelman) is actually a reaction to the pompus critical methodologies used to interpret these works, rather than against the works themselves, which are brilliant but in the most brilliantly unassuming way. Highly murky interpretations of graphic fiction too often become a substitute for the works themselves.
"Caricature", Clowes's follow-up to his breakthrough "Ghost World", does not attempt to be anything more than it is -- a fine collection of intriguing stories in the graphic fiction format....
Clowes's characters (or caricatures) are "true". They capture that "stranger-than-fiction" truth which is often too "neurotic" or "disturbing" to be taken seriously. Each story of "Caricature" had me thinking, "this seems so autobiographical!" - and yet he could not have lived all the characters' lives. That is the main point: even if you, the reader, does not relate personally to caricaturists, pseudo-hip punksters, freaks, and adolescent bundles of confusion, you still realize they are in the world, walking or driving beside you.
Dan Clowes himself is a caricaturist, not only of faces and gestures and movements but of the general visual and verbal ridiculousness of the world. There’s nothing “hidden” or “pretentious” about his clear lines and conversational dialogues. Many of his characters' inner lives are coneyed in so little space, and without "so many words". That's the magic of comic (versus strict prose) fiction - you think you're being fed something simple; that perhaps the legions of comic fanboys are fooling themselves into believing the legitimacy of their "art form"... and then you remember the girl with her head in her chin, or the eerie, crossed-out messages in the sand, or the half-scowl of the creepy roommate on page X. Pictures haunt like words cannot (and vice-versa). The captions, which seemed so helpful at the time, have fallen away and only the lines and colors remain. It doesn't take a literary theorist to recognize how illustrations (the proverbial "1000 words") can creep under your skin in the most elementary way.
The stories in *this* collection are both disturbing and fascinating. I have known these people! Or at least their cousins. While Clowes's written introductions ("Hi, my name is John Smith and I'm a busboy...") aren't always original, and some of the endings seem anti-climactic, by the end of every story you are engaged in a merging of the visual and the written... making sense of what you’ve just read.
This is not a "new" narrative art. It's one of the oldest, and yet it’s still polarizing today, as the "funny page" criticisms. Weird, yes, disturbing, yes – but like any good collection of short fiction it comes highly recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
so good its against the law not to like it, January 22, 2011
Its true! The police come and take you away if you dont like this book!
Yup, its a really great book--as a series of graphic short stories it's great, but its also just as great when compared to any "conventional" literary story.
Detectives, artists, lonely children, down-and-out superheroes--outcasts all-- are among some of the characters--or caricatures--that find themselves starring in these tales.
Clowes is as good or better than any writer out there today in any medium. He's intelligent, versatile, and challenging. His stories are all elliptical and post-modern. They leave a lot of loose ends dangling, which will annoy some people.
But i like loose ends. They tickle me. haha
If graphic fiction has an argument as the form general fiction will eventually take when we all become incapable of reading blocks of uninterrupted text, Clowes is one of those writers who best support the argument that graphic/text is the way to go.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No