|
Product Features
|
Product Details
Would you like to give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
39 of 39 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Bargain,
By Judy (Newark, DE) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
I purchased this digital reader for my husband, who suffers from macular degeneration. He loves it, and was able to read for four hours the first day. We plugged it into a 27" TV that we don't use very often, and placed it in a room where it can be setup all the time. The only problem we noticed was the batteries need to be replaced frequently when using the reader for long periods of time. The batteries died around the third day. We plugged the reader into the wall outlet, and it works fine. The TV has to be plugged in anyway, so it's not like you don't have an electric cord to deal with anyway. I'd recommend this product to anyone that has problems reading, and the price is right.
21 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Like new eyes,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
I gave this to my Dad (who has just been certified as legally blind) as a birthday present, and after a very easy set up he was almost crying - because he could read his newspaper again. My Mom has told me that he brags to his buddies in the dialysis clinic about his "new eyes".
I can't recommend this highly enough. An absolute bargain, easy to set up, and easy to use. You just need to know that you will need a TV that has a "video in" or "component" input. So older, analog TVs will probably not be usable, and you should consider that in your purchase decision. But even if you have to by a new TV it will still be less expensive than some of the other digital magnifiers which can run $500-$800.
26 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good for Newspaper reading,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
I bought this for my dad, but my mom uses it more...and loves it.
Pros: 1. easy to set up and use. Uses AAA batteries to power the camera and its six LED lights or an included AC adapter. 2. reasonable price 3. sharp focus 4. output is standard definition 720x480 4:3 composite video that plugs into the yellow RCA composite input on any TV Cons: 1. Its area of regard is only about 2-1/2" wide at a time. That's good for standard newspaper columns, but means you are dragging it across a book to read a line. You thus need to move it left/right over the text a lot. 2. It's not ergonomic. Old arthritic fingers need an easy-to-grab shape. Instead, it's tapered toward the top so that it tends to slip out of one's grip. I actually added textured gripper strips to it so it's easier to hold onto. It's like an oversized mouse that's not shaped properly. 3. Though it can be battery powered, it comes with an AC adapter that plugs into the back of the scanner next to the video output. It also needs the composite video output cable, of course, to get the video to the TV. That cable has a giant electronic choke attached to it on both ends. This makes the cable look like a snake that swallowed a giant rat. Now you have two cables to deal with. Both plug in and both can fall out as you use them, suddenly either losing power or video. They could have done it better. 4. The AC adapter and the video cables are too short. They need to be at least 10' long and should be attached together as a unit. You most likely will need to buy extensions for both the AC and the video cable, unless you want to sit five feet from the TV. Bottom line, it's better to enlarge the text to your large screen TV using this miniature camera than to wear magnifying lenses and get closer to the book.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|