|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
59 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
34 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good for tests. Lacks accuracy and convenient features,
FX-260SOLAR is light, slim, and durable. This is also the official calculator for use on GED Math tests and is permitted for use on SAT and PSAT/NMSQT. It is solar-powered meaning you won't be stuck with a dead calculator in the middle of a test. The "mode" menu is printed beneath the screen so that you don't need the user's guide again. (Trust me. This is a BIG plus!) It also handles fraction calculation, converts degrees/minutes/seconds both ways, and computes mean and standard deviation.
However, it lacks the HEX-OCT-BIN conversion and complex number calculation features to make it an all-around technical calculator. Users also need to press SHIFT to use the "1/x" and "nCr" functions. In comparison, Casio FX-300MS offers a much more convenient layout and costs only $1 more with the sale going on now (April 2005). On the numerical side, this model does not store enough digits to be a good financial calculator. For example, this model evaluates 200000 (1 + 0.06/360)^(360*30) to about 1209747.95. A more accurate answer should be about 1209748.04. TI got it; Casio did't. Although the difference is so small that it often doesn't matter in highschool problems, it looks bad on presentation.
21 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Outstanding Casio quality for an excellent price,
By
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great priced scientific calculator,
By Andrew Brown (Wapakoneta, Ohio United States) - See all my reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Good calculator.,
This is a fine calculator, and inexpensive. The only shortcoming I see is that it doesn't have a '1,000' separator. This makes large numbers hard to see quickly.
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The only calculator you need,
By Martin P McGreal Jr (St. Louis, MO) - See all my reviews Things I love about this calculator: 1) Durable 2) Light 3) Small, doesn't take up much room 4) Cheap 5) Works in fractions (won't reduce them to decimal values) 6) Has all the trig functions 7) Even has a pseudo-random number generator 8) Has all the scientific functions you could need 9) Its x^y function accepts fractions for y The only thing I would add to this calculator would be a logarithm function that I could assign my own base to (log_y). It already has log_10 and log_e, but sometimes a log_2 is useful as well, for instance. I think the size of this calculator is perfect. It's small and thin, but not too small. The screen is perfectly readable, and the buttons are the rubberized type that provide a nice tactile feel.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
35 years of Casios,
By I like this fx260 the best, for reasons others have mentioned. Further, the keys make a nice tactile click with depressions, screen is clearer, calculation speed is faster, the solar cells are more sensitive to lower light conditions, its light and sized to fit a shirt pocket with its case on, it feels good as a hand held. Why get the fx260 instead of the other reputable Casio Casio FX-300MS Plus 229-Function Scientific Calculator which has almost 100 more functions for just an added $ 1-3 ? Ergonomics and required functions mostly: the 300MS is much bigger, it won't fit a shirt pocket, its heavier, and its keystrokes differently compared to a basic Casio. Many learning aids and high accuracy calculators are better as software on laptops with higher resolution graphing screens and libraries of functions. Handheld calculators are better focused in being portable, like a swiss-army knife tool for small jobs. If you don't need extra functions, unused but excess capacity makes it harder to lug what should be a go anywhere, easy to trot, calculator.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great value for money,
By
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great priced scientific calculator,
By Andrew Brown (Wapakoneta, Ohio United States) - See all my reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Good as ever,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Casio Scientific Calculator (FX260SLRSC) (Office Product)
I've been using this calculator for at least 10 years and it's just a very reliable, simple appliance. I particularly like the ease of compounding interest. The only problem I've ever had is I lose them from time to time and for some reason nobody ever offers to return them :-)
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Casio's FX-260: A Winner for the Environment,
By
This review is from: Casio Scientific Calculator (FX260SLRSC) (Office Product)
Casio's FX-260 Scientific Solar Calculator is not only a great instrument for a great price, it is also a great savings for the environment. Unlike so many other so-called "solar" scientific calcs that have "dual-power" or "battery back-up", the FX-260 has a large enough solar cell strip to power it even in extremely low level lighting conditions. Batteries are never really a requirement in calculators, unless you own stock in a button battery company.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
$15.99 $10.14
In Stock | ||