Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This book appears in its entirety in "Reporting Vietnam", March 17, 1999
By A Customer
This book appears in its entirety in Volume One of the Library of America's "Reporting Vietnam 1957-1969" published 1998.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
One of the most gut-wrenching indictments of war ever written, January 22, 2011
This review is from: Casualties of War (Paperback)
New York Times writer Daniel Laing's chronicle of one young soldier's helplessness in the face of appalling evil. The rape, torture and murder of 20 year old Vietnamese peasant Phi Than Mao in the Highlands of Vietnam by the other four members of his patrol, all of whom for reasons of confidentiality are changed (along with the protagonists, who is given the unlikely name "Sven Errikson") is a war crime that even with the Mai Lai massacre and the depraved behavior of some US soldiers in Afghanistan as revealed by the recent WikiLeaks, defies comprehension. This story was given a pretty good treatment by Brian DePalma in the 1989 film Casualties of War (Unrated Extended Cut). The real story, of course, is infinitely more complex and gruesome. The leader of Errikson's patrol and instigator of the crime, 20 year old Sergeant Tony Meserve, was a decorated soldier who had only 30 days left in Vietnam. From Brooklyn NY, his behavior around the time of the atrocity (November 18, 1966), was characterized by other soldiers as "erratic". He would fire at Vietnamese civilians sometimes simply because "he felt like it". Ralph Clark, whose behavior reads like that of a textbook psychopath, not a "war traumatized soldier", was from Philadelphia. The other two, brothers Rafe and Manuel and Diaz, were from San Diego. They seemed "affable" but quick to bow under Meserve's commands. Before leaving for a patrol which was characterized by African American lieutenant Reilly as "high risk", Meserve related to the rest of the patrol that it would be "good for the morale of the squad" if they "picked up a girl for some boom boom." They would carry her around, rape her, then kill her when she became inconvient. Which is exactly what they did despite Errikson's attempts to stop it. Trapped in a sweaty jungle with four other men who had signed a pact with the devil and numbed their conscience, he was told repeatedly that if he did not participate in the rape, he might become a "friendly casualty" and end up coming home in a bodybag. Though he was unable to save Mao's life--I'm not sure how he could have--he immediately went to the authorities upon his return to base. He was dissuaded in every fashion imaginable from going public with the knowledge. Two attempts on his life were made by friends of the other four. The military pulled every trick in the book, offering him any position he wanted, even a discharge, until Errikson finally told Lieutenant Reilly that he wanted to be a door gunner, was not going anywhere and was not shutting his mouth. What's even more horrifying than the murder was the result of this man's valor and honesty. When the four were finally court martialed, the defense questioned Errikson's sexuality, brought up the possibility that Mao was indeed a "VC sympathizer", and let him know very bluntly that military tribunals were notoriously lenient and that he might want to think about his wife at home. Sent to Fort Leavenworth as a penalty, all four of these men were released at a fraction of their stated sentences. Great for Errikson and his then newborn daughter. Though this book is about an incident in Vietnam things have changed very little. Soldiers who are honest are afraid to stand up to the "boy's club", and incidents like this are actually innumerable in the lost war of Afghanistan. Read this and understand what it means to sneer at ideas like world peace. Recommended for anyone who wants to understand conscience, what war does to men, and how the "military tribunal system" for war criminals actually works.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
No One Was Saved, March 19, 2011
This review is from: Casualties of War (Paperback)
Truth was called the first casualty of war way back in 1918, but there are of course other casualties as well also dealt with in this real-life account of one U.S. soldier's experience confronting rape and silence in Vietnam. A short book, "Casualties Of War" was first published in 1969 as a New Yorker magazine article. Sadly, it was never updated by author Daniel Lang to account for the fate of the whistleblower, whom Lang renames "Sven Eriksson" and describes as a carpenter from Minnesota in civilian life. One reads this book, quickly, wishing to know of his final fate as well as that of the four men on his U.S. Army patrol he saw put in jail for their part in the kidnapping, rape, and murder of Phan Thi Mao in November, 1966. Eriksson was the only member of his patrol not to take part in the crimes, which took some guts in itself. After he did testify, he found himself repeatedly questioned about why he made trouble for his brothers-in-arms. "One M.P., I remember, told me he could have understood it if I had gone to bat for a G.I. who was murdered, but how could I do it for a Vietnamese?" Lang records Eriksson recalling. "But he was very tolerant about it. He said it was only human to make mistakes." That war creates monsters is a theme of this book, but "Casualties Of War" is as much a cautionary tale of peer pressure and groupthink. In fact, the war machine does eventually pause to take stock of the crime, and attempt to punish the wrongdoers. It's the way those wrongdoers are so gingerly handled that causes grief. One, Corporal Clark, is described as a kind of psychotic cheerleader for the murder, a clear Section 8 case. The group leader, Sergeant Meserve, is admired for his skill on the battlefield but episodes of casual cruelty speak to a darker side not kept in check by his superiors. The last two soldiers on the fatal patrol are not made of the same hard stuff, but don't want to upset Meserve or Clark so play along. Ericksson doesn't spare himself in Lang's account. He wonders forlornly if he could have done more to save Mao. Lang notes how he struggled at times with court officers defending the other soldiers at their courts-martial, who questioned Ericksson's desire to serve and even his failure to abandon his comrades and take the by-now ill and traumatized girl home. Their questions, and Ericksson's halting answers, makes for a much more vivid and disturbing reading experience. Lang writes with a curious detachment, perhaps residual from the court records he went through while researching his story. Of course, some of this is effective when relating the rape and killing, as it denotes veracity. But once away from the killing, wrestling with his thoughts in the company of a pair of friendly Mormons who help him find justice, Ericksson doesn't come alive in any big way. Lang notes that Ericksson was in general a quiet man, and perhaps this was a reason for the cold tone that predominates. (The Brian DePalma movie from 1989 pushes against this in a slightly suspect way by creating later confrontations between Ericksson, Meserve, and the others. The reality was less spectacular, and more interesting.) My biggest problem with the book was that I wish it went on longer, testament to its minor but enduring greatness. Death happens in war, but when it happens like this it is hard to accept the idea of justice deferred, or delayed. "Casualties Of War" addresses both the challenge of seeing to such justice and the lingering question of whether or not it was really worth it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|