70 of 72 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A rave review for Catastrophe, March 14, 2000
This review is from: Catastrophe: An Investigation into the Origins of Modern Civilization (Hardcover)
Within minutes of finishing this riveting, wide-ranging book, I was composing an email recommending it to several friends.
The author -- archaeologist and journalist David Keys -- posits that a single event in about 535 CE triggered between 18 months and 3+ yrs of bad weather worldwide. The first calamity to follow the catastrophe was drought in some places, massive floods in others. On the heels of terrible weather came famine worldwide and plague in the old world.
Implicated in and resulting from these, he traces massive movements of peoples in Africa, Asia, Europe, and North and South America, and radical changes in government everywhere. (He reaches a bit when discussing North America, which has the thinnest archaeological and no historical evidence.)
Among -- but not limited to -- the changes he attributes to the catastrophe are these --
- the triumph of the Anglo-Saxons over the Celts
- the entrenchment of Buddhism in Japan, and Japan's unification
- new governmental structures in various SE Asian states
- the "fall" of the Roman Empire
- the rise of Islam
- the flowering of Anasazi culture
- the rise of the first pan-Peruvian empire
- the abandonment of Arianism
- the development of a Jewish state in today's southern Ukraine, leading to the separation of the Ashkenazim from the "original" Jews
A significant part of the book is spent in explanation of some of the science used in dating historic events. Keys explains dendrochronology (dating by tree rings), the development of the study of glacial ice cores, and variations in carbon isotopes over time, among other methods. His explanations are thorough but simple, never lapsing into jargon.
As an example of the breadth of his reach, here are the entries for "O" in the index (chosen because it's significantly shorter than most): Obadiah, king of Khazars; Oc Eo (Funan); Oghuz Turks; Ohio State University Institute of Polar Studies; Opone (East Africa); Osman; Ostrogoth; Ottoman Empire; Outuken Yish; Oxkintok, Teotihuacano influence in.
Despite the fact that Keys writes as a layman, for a lay audience, the book is well footnoted. Don't worry, they're at the back of the book and can be ignored by those who choose to do so. Readers who use footnotes will find dozens of topics (that would be distractions in the text) explored, or at least mentioned in the notes.
Keys also includes a several-page bibliography. I have already read several titles mentioned in the bibliography and no doubt will continue to use it as a resource.
I am bored by reviewers who go on about what a book isn't. What Catastrophe is, is a well-annotated book that's readable, nicely written, and thoroughly researched, that won't insult its readers and is likely to inspire quite a few to explore new areas of interest. Oh yes, it's entertaining too!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
57 of 59 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Well, Something Happened In The Sixth Century..., March 21, 2000
This review is from: Catastrophe: An Investigation into the Origins of Modern Civilization (Hardcover)
I must admit I opened this book with some doubts, expecting to struggle through an "Eric von Daniken" potboiler of implausible facts and theories. To his credit, Keys doesn't venture too far from the historically proven facts -- such as they are, because this is a poorly documented era -- in his quest to puzzle out just what did happen to set the cultural pot boiling so frantically in the period 540-650CE.
Trouble is, the historically verifiable facts are very thin on the ground. But if you've never pondered what sent Byzantium on its steepest nosedive, why Islam took over so much of the Middle East in so short a time, what prompted the collapse of the Celts, why several Central and South America civilizations foundered around this time, here's a theory worth considering, if 'coincidence' isn't good enough for you ... a huge volcanic eruption in Indonesia, with a consequent climatic upheaval (drought, storms, plague, etc.)
Like all determinist approaches to ancient history, the theory is essentially unverifiable, but it's an entertaining book on the darkest of the dark ages, nonetheless. I'm sure academics can find much to criticize, but it seems well-researched, and is very clearly written. People will be talking about this book a lot over the next few months, so arm yourself for the inevitable debates!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
66 of 70 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Praise for Catastrophe, March 12, 2000
This review is from: Catastrophe: An Investigation into the Origins of Modern Civilization (Hardcover)
Keys' aim of the book was well stated in the introduction - "to help change people's view of the past - and of the future". After reading this 300-plus-page description of fairly well documented research and speculation, I found his approach to the information novel more than anything. For the first time in history, we have the opportunity to effectively investigate and analyze collected data from the time period between 535 and 536. Keys presents us with an opportunity to view tree ring evidence, geopolitical instabilities, and geological speculation in the context of a worldwide historical framework. Moreover, he suggests that "a force of nature ultimately lay behind much of the change experienced by the world in the sixth and seventh centuries A.D." As someone outside of the field of archaeology, anthropology or geological science, I found the historical perspective that is offered unique (it's definitely the first time I've read anything about the evolution of religions, volcanology and the rise and fall of civilizations in the same book). My one critique concerning the writing style itself is that it tends to be repetitive in places, especially toward the end of chapters, and it's clear that Keys wishes to play to the historically savy audiences as much as possible, bouncing between discussions of Ashkenazi non-Cohenic Levites and non-Levite Ashkenazi Jews, which makes some passages difficult to follow (what was the point of this chapter, you'll ask yourself). There are chapters which tend to be more academic than explanatory, delving into details that could have been omitted without losing the spirit of the work. Overall, I found the book enjoyable and a good introduction into the subject. If one day more conclusive evidence surfaces from the interest generated, I applaude Mr. Keys for the effort. I think he's done the scientific community a great service and offers a new perspective on what might be considered dry history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No