This book discusses the New Age movement, criticises its spiritual claims, and looks at spirit guides, reincarnation, quartz crystals, UFO abductions, and psychics.
--This text refers to the
Hardcover
edition.
| |||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Do Insults Really Work?,
By Jeff Danelek (Lakewood, Colorado United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Channeling into the New Age: The "Teachings" of Shirley Maclaine and Other Such Gurus (Hardcover)
I have just one question for Mr. Gordon: does he find that condescension and old-fashioned ridicule really works in convincing people to abandon their beliefs? I find it hard to imagine but like so many Promethean debunkers out there, they must, as a group, collectively believe it does, for why else do they rely on it with such regularity? It's not that Channeling Into The New Age isn't a relatively entertaining and highly readable work, it's just that I found Gordon's demeaning personality and arrogance tiresome and juvenile. I know he believes he's only attempting to save the ignorant and superstitious masses from themselves-a commendable goal to be sure-but I can't help but believe he's not into debunking more for the sheer enjoyment it brings him. To refute Gordon's work topic by topic would take some time; suffice is to say he takes the New Age "gurus"-and Miss MacLaine in particular-to task on a number of issues, from channeling and the use of crystals to reincarnation and UFOs, all of which has been done before and since by better writers. There simply was nothing new in any of this. While I found myself agreeing on a few points, most of it was just another litany of insults (he especially enjoys working the words "nonsense" and "gullible" into every other paragraph) with little meat on them. His status as an outsider puts him at a great disadvantage; much like trying to attack Roman Catholicism without once stepping foot inside a church or making any effort to understand it's precepts within the context of its own history, it just can't be done on anything more than a superficial level. The New Age movement cannot be attacked the way one would take on an established religion, for it has no set doctrines or dogmas that one must adhere to. The entire idea behind it is that one is free to explore their own spirituality as they wish and pick and choose those elements that speak for them, while ignoring other ideas that do not. I really don't think Henry understands that, preferring to attack it en masse as one would, say, Mormonism. For example, he castigates reincarnation without, I think, really bothering to try and understand it. In one instance, he rejects more enlightened interpretations of how karma works-that as an "educational" element designed to encourage spiritual growth-by declaring that that isn't how it has been traditionally taught (as though ancient concepts can't be refined and rethought over time.) In this and other areas, Gordon talks at great lengths about things of which he knows little, dismisses entire concepts out of hand as "nonsense," again without taking much time to discuss their merits or weaknesses, and generally dismisses all psychics and parapsychologists as con artists, fruitcakes, or-at best-well-meaning but seriously deluded quacks. Of course, Gordon saves his most voracious attacks for Miss MacLaine, whom he seems to admire even while attempting to humiliate her. Not a huge fan of the actress/New Age guru myself, I still felt his efforts to attack her beliefs to be mean-spirited and juvenile. Instead of confronting her philosophy on rational/logical grounds, he instead devotes whole chapters to listing various remarks she has made and then writing some cute rebuttal designed, I suppose, to enlighten us to the dangers her statements represent. While Gordon makes a few good points and does us some service, I guess, in making us aware of the potential pitfalls and dangers the New Age movement-and Shirley MacLaine in general-represent, the general tone of the book is that of a bratty schoolkid who snickers at others who aren't as smart as he imagines himself to be. Good try, but there are better books out there.
3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Trash,
By
This review is from: Channeling into the New Age: The "Teachings" of Shirley Maclaine and Other Such Gurus (Hardcover)
This is truly a piece of trash. The only saving grace is that it is funny but save your money and see "South park" (Go Butters!). If you want a good instructive book, then read this:
Sage-ing While Age-ing
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
THE 'NEW AGE' IS PAST,
By
This review is from: Channeling into the New Age: The "Teachings" of Shirley Maclaine and Other Such Gurus (Hardcover)
Henry Gordon
Channeling into the New Age: The "Teachings" of Shirley MacLaine and other Such Gurus (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1988) 198 pages A breezy, popular critique of "New Age" beliefs by a journalist and skeptic, who is often called upon to confront "New Age" gurus in the media. Gordon deals with crystals, channeling, etc. The second half is devoted specifically to the life and 'teachings' of Shirley MacLaine. Other books critial of "new age" thinking will be found on a bibliography on the Internet, which can be located by using the following search term: "OCCULTISM AND SCIENCE". James Leonard Park, skeptic.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|