Charlie's Angels (2011) 1 Season 2011

Amazon Instant Video

Season 1
(10)
Available in HD

0. Charlie's Angels Season 1 Sneak Peek TV-14

Meet the new Charlie's Angels! Minka Kelly (Eve), Rachael Taylor (Abby), Anne Ilonzeh (Kate) and Ramon Rodriguez (Bosley) star in this action-packed reboot of the original series.

Runtime:
2 minutes
Original air date:
September 19, 2011

Available to watch on supported devices.

Charlie's Angels Season 1 Sneak Peek

By placing your order, you agree to our Terms of Use. Sold by Amazon Digital Services, Inc. Additional taxes may apply.
Season 1

Product Details

Genres Drama, Adventure, Action
Season year 2011
Network ABC
Purchase rights Stream instantly and download to 2 locations Details
Format Amazon Instant Video (streaming online video and digital download)

Customer Reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By J. colon-ocasio on November 15, 2011
Being a long time fan of the original series, who also enjoyed the cinematic takes on the franchise, I was eagerly awaiting this show and how it would be transformed for the current masses.
The season opener was adequate enough but it took me a couple more episodes to enjoy and actually fall in love with this cast. The gals, while at times a bit limited by the dialogue, deliver with style. While some action scenes and editing pace sometimes defy the credibility of the plots, I am willing to forgive this because I realize it is pure and simple escapism.
Now I understand ABC has cancelled the series. Too bad. Quite disappointing. In episode 6 we finally get a glimpse of things to come.. when we even find out a bit more history about Bosley and the plot sets off what could be a possible archway to be revisited in future episoed. Too bad this plot will probably not get as developed as maybe planned by the production team.
In the broadcasting world full of "reality" trash on TV, I do advocate the return of fun and escapism TV. The new Charlie's Angels was just that: fun plots, beautiful ladies who know how to get down and dirty, great locales, and a dash of humor.. which is so very much missing on TV now a days.

RIP. But to the cast.. You guys were great.

Here's my ultimate fantasy plot. The girls land in Hawaii in pursuit of a killer, who is also being investigated by the guys of 5-0. Imagine the look on Steve, Danny and Chin upon running into the angels accidentally during the case... I can envision those boys going gaga over the Angels, who take charge of the case, while the girls of 5-0 flare up in envy. Enter Bosley..who upon seeing Kono, is unable to concentrate on the job. Lori is so upset about Steve's undivided attention towards the Angels that she quits 5-0 and leaves the island for good.
So CBS... are you reading this? LOL LOL
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By HAMLET on October 1, 2011
When I found out that ABC was producing a reboot of the classic TV series Charlie's Angels starring Jaclyn Smith, Kate Jackson, Farrah Fawcett, Cheryl Ladd, Tanya Roberts, David Doyle and John Forsythe as the never-seen Charlie, I thought, "Why? Why are networks and movie studios remaking things that have been done well?" Though in some cases (The Ten Commandments & Ben-Hur), the remakes are actually quite good. CBS scored a major hit with its reboot of the 1968-1980 classic cop show Hawaii Five-O, and it's one that I really like. This first episode really sets everything up, though I would have preferred an origin story, a la the pilot of CBS' reboot of Hawaii Five-0 or in the vein of Christopher Nolan's first installment of his immensely popular Batman franchise. Really good stuff. Good thing it's clean, like Hawaii Five-0 (some violence and mild language, but NO sex or nudity). Leonard Goldberg, who produced the original series, another cop show called T.J. Hooker and is currently producing Blue Bloods, which also airs on CBS, is also producing this reboot of the series, and it airs on ABC, which is owned by Disney, both of which factors may explain why it's clean, which is a good thing. Let's see how it turns out...
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Trewthe VINE VOICE on November 7, 2011
With all the crap on tv the pure stench of the Kardashian's and their arrogant pimp Ryan Seacrest and so many more lower than low brow shows on, it's really an insult that this got cancelled am a huge fan of the original show and i must say when i first read about this remake i was like " whatever dude, hos on a boat solving crimes looking pretty in Miami" Then i gave it a chance the first show was not good, sorry to the uber fans, it wasn't, but these things happen with new shows so i gave it another chance and boy am i glad i did!They capture the original series of the show which was NOT camp as Entertainment Weekly seems to believe was their downfall for not being campy enough.Feel really bad for this cast they did a great job, were serious girls with real problems, they weren't aloof hookers who solved cases on parole like i am guessing might have made them a hit with the idiot generation!The girls and Boz deserved better, hope they don't take this personally like THEY did something wrong, because they kept it classy and never went for the cheap shot, guess if they had the invested money in sets like the gals over at Pan Am they would still be given a chance, because that show ...OMG don't even get me started! Well Angels you will be missed, note to studio execs, THIS kinda crap( pulling shows off without giving them a chance) is why people are leery to even chance a new show,shame!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
By JOSEPH TROIANI on July 8, 2013
Format: Amazon Instant Video Verified Purchase
Charlie's Angels starts in the 70s and finishes I. The 80s. So you get the 70s clothes and free sex attitude for the first 2 seasons. Then you can see the hairstyles change as well as the attitude toward sex. But this is quality TV No it is reality driven like maybe law and order but it is fun with characters you root for. The biggest draw back was Farrah leaving the show after only one season. But they all easy on the eyes on e you get past the clothes of the era.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
By Bradley Stephenson on January 25, 2012
I was really impressed with this series. It looked great with fantastic scenery and fashion and had some great actors in the main roles (Rachel Taylor in particular steals every scene she's in. Fans will remember her from the first transformers movie as the hacker). There are also some cool guest stars that viewers will recognise from other tv shows such as Jack's dad from LOST and Lois Lane (Erika Durance) from Smallville.

While it may appear as a "Mystery of the Week" type show it actually began to develop quite a bit of backstory for each character and even suggested that Charlie may be more than he appears (possibly a villain).

It's a shame this series was cancelled so early in it's life as it really would have found an audience if it had been allowed to air for a full 13 episode season, as originally planned.

Really worth checking out in my opinion especially if you love good looking people, exotic locations, action, spy mystery and fresh editing.

I liked it!
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again