|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Insightful Look at Person-Affecting Consequentialism,
By A Customer
This review is from: Child versus Childmaker: Future Persons and Present Duties in Ethics and the Law (Studies in Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy) (Paperback)
Author addresses issues of creating future people and conduct toward future people within a perspective sympathetic to the utilitarian foundations of current social policy theory. Presents an alternative to the total utility view that genuinely takes into account individual well-being, by incorporating the "person-affecting" insight. Read this book if you are interested in normative ethical theory and/or issues surrounding new reproductive technologies.
3 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Anyone working in population ethics needs to read this.,
By A Customer
This review is from: Child versus Childmaker: Future Persons and Present Duties in Ethics and the Law (Studies in Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy) (Paperback)
This book develops a moral theory that provides a potential background for "wrongful life" suits, and a perspective from which to evaluate new reproductive technologies. The writing is sometimes technical, and non-philosophers may find this book tough going. But from now on, anyone interested in these issues will need to read Roberts.
4 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Weak analysis,
By J. P. Caterwaul (Chicago) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Child versus Childmaker: Future Persons and Present Duties in Ethics and the Law (Studies in Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy) (Paperback)
This is not a useful or interesting treatment of the issues it raises. The analysis is weak and focused more on terminological problems than on substantive insights. Cannot recommend it for anyone with an interest in the subject matter.
0 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
should read,
This review is from: Child versus Childmaker: Future Persons and Present Duties in Ethics and the Law (Studies in Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy) (Paperback)
This book is very thought provoking - presented in a way to make us consider different sides of the questions people face. Right and wrong are not always as clear as one might imagine. Read this book to consider the conflicts people face.
2 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Uninteresting, unoriginal, unworthy of serious study,
By A Customer
This review is from: Child versus Childmaker: Future Persons and Present Duties in Ethics and the Law (Studies in Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy) (Paperback)
This book consists of nothing but jargon-laden rehashing ofothers' ideas and a few poorly conceived and insignificant accretionsto those ideas. The problems and ideas presented here are notinherently difficult to understand; the author engineeers problems of understanding for the reader with her stilted prose and her focus on abstract academic theorizing. She forgets that the underlying problems are real ones, facing real people, not merely occasions for her to exhibit that she has read about some esoteric concepts in the academic literature.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Child versus Childmaker by Melinda A. Roberts (Hardcover - July 1998)
$113.00
Usually ships in 1 to 2 months | ||