Start reading Children of Apollo on the free Kindle Reading App or on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Enter a promotion code
or gift card

Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Children of Apollo [Kindle Edition]

Mark R. Whittington
3.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (26 customer reviews)

Print List Price: $26.99
Kindle Price: $5.99
You Save: $21.00 (78%)

If you buy a new print edition of this book (or purchased one in the past), you can buy the Kindle edition for only $1.99 (Save 67%). Print edition purchase must be sold by Amazon. Learn more.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $5.99  
Hardcover $36.99  
Paperback $25.50  
Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Book Description

In 1969 a CIA analyst reports on the effects of the race to the Moon on the Soviet economy and military readiness. In response, President Nixon ramps up the space race with a vengence. Six years later, the first woman walks on the Moon during the mission of Apollo 23.

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Mark Whittington is a writer and computer analyst residing in Houston, Texas. He is the co-author, along with his wife Chantal, of Nocturne, a Novel of Suspense.

Product Details

  • File Size: 671 KB
  • Print Length: 566 pages
  • Sold by: Amazon Digital Services, Inc.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B0011FCUSS
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Word Wise: Not Enabled
  • Lending: Enabled
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #401,365 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?

Customer Reviews

3.2 out of 5 stars
3.2 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
27 of 30 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Great plot. Incredible amount of sloppy errors. May 15, 2009
This book, for me, represents the best and worst about self publishing. The best because sometimes good books simply are not picked up by publishing houses, and this one deserved to be published. The worst because a commercial publisher would have cleaned up the prose and made this book really shine.

The plot is really good. Well crafted. Exciting. Good pacing. But the text is rife with spelling and grammatical errors (I didn't count but I'm thinking on average more than one per page). Even a mediocre copy editor could have fixed 99% of the problems with the text. Now, if this book had been crappy in general, I wouldn't have cared. But it is actually a great story. Thus, my frustration stems from the fact that a very good book is dragged down by easily fixable stuff, most of which MS Word would have picked up. It's just plain sloppy.

Some examples of what I mean: Berkeley is not spelled "Berkly". Camaro is not spelled "Camero". Taut is not spelled "taunt". Aide is not spelled "Aid". Applause is not spelled "applauds". Champagne is not spelled "champaign". Asti Spumante is not spelled "Asti Spurmanti". Las Cruces is not spelled "Las Cruzus". Alan Shepard (the astronaut) is not spelled "Alan Shepherd". To add insult to injury, the author does actually spell the name correctly once... Baikonour is spelled in three ways in the book, both incorrect. Proper grammar does not include things like "going to fight for if-no when-you send me to Congress." Stylistically, there are gems like "They looked at each other in for a moment, sharing the awful truth they had just shared."

Then we have the technical errors. I will grant that the author is not an aerospace expert but for this book a modicum of research would have been required.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
26 of 33 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Disappointing. So much potential. August 13, 2003
Such a great plot concept. The execution was very junior varsity. Countless spelling and grammar mistakes. For example, one character drives a Camaro, but in the book its constantly written as "Camero." Also, aerospace company McDonnell Douglas is constantly referred to as "MacDonell Douglas." For a book that is trying to authoritatively discuss "what if" Nixon kept Apollo going etc. etc. , to constantly make spelling errors, forget words where needed etc. etc.- works to undermine the entire story.
The characters are cartoonish. From the Soviets, to Nixon, to liberal peaceniks, to the astronauts - all coming off like a parody.
There are glimpses of excitement and interesting plotlines, but the junior varsity nature of the writing quickly diminishes it...
Was this review helpful to you?
9 of 12 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Children of Apollo November 17, 2006
I ALMOST didn't bother to finish this book (something I almost never do). I'm a fan of "hard" sci-fi, cut my teeth on Heinlein and Clarke, and have a special love for "alternative history". Although Whittington's premise is plausible, he brings almost nothing new to the story, even throwing in some dialogue and situations from other fiction and non-fiction books about the early days of NASA. But what really got me, and I admit I'm a bit picky, was the OBVIOUS lack of editing. Not only is it filled with numerous, repeated mispellings, but even whole words used inappropriately. And it's Madalyn Murray O'Hair, not O'Hara, or O'Hare as she becomes in the end. Halfway through, I thought "This HAS to be self-published", and I was right. Both of this author's books have been published by Xlibris, and they'll publish yours, too, for $375. I'll volunteer to be your editor.

But, y'know, fatuous as I found the writing in the early going, it grew on me, and I found that I actually liked it. Probably won't read it again, but I liked it. So might you, if you can get past the lack of editing.

And to the reviewer who considered it "liberal-bashing", it didn't seem that way to me, even though one of the "heavies" is a liberal Congressman. It was that "either-or" approach to the space program espoused by the liberals of the time that killed it. Pretty hard to tell a story of an alternate history without mentioning that. It would be like writing a real history of WWII without including Neville Chamberlain. And the Speaker of the House is certainly a sympathetic character. Whittington does get in a couple of digs at some guy from Arkansas, but doesn't mention him by name. And you'd have to be in really deep denial to think that the Soviets didn't "run" Americans during the Cold War. Look up the Venona Project. I'm sure we were doing the same (I hope). "(International) Politics ain't beanbag!"
Was this review helpful to you?
23 of 33 people found the following review helpful
By A Customer
The author of Children of Apollo has a very shrewd eye for the time period he is writing about, even though in the style of alternative history he has changed certain events of the early 1970s to suit him and his story. His slightly enhanced Apollo program seems to have altered just about everything, to the course of the Vietnam War, to the Middle East, to the fortunes of one Richard Nixon, and even popular culture (at one point he has one of Stephen King's early novels taking place on board a haunted space station.)
While Children of Apollo is primarily an adventure story about space exploration, it also has a certain element of satire. Included in the list of the author's targets for gentle (and sometimes not so gentle ribbing) are the forementioned President Nixon, a young and randy Bill Clinton, Steven Spielberg, Madeline Murray O'Hara, William Proxmire, liberal Democrats in general, the Soviet Union, and various spooks, federal agents, astronauts, and politicians.
The book is a delight to read. It has a feel of being about events that actually happened, even though they did not. I found myself sincerly wishing that a woman really had walked on the Moon around Christmas of 1975 and being sad that she did not.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars excellent read
A good alternative history story with excellent character development and a believable plot.
I'll be looking for more from this author!
Published 17 months ago by warcok
1.0 out of 5 stars Awful
When I found Children of Apollo in a used bookshop a few years ago, I had high expectations. The idea of what if the US space program had been continued in anything like it's Moon... Read more
Published 18 months ago by Romantic Whiskers
5.0 out of 5 stars Fans of alternative history
Since I have enjoyed other books written by Mark Whittington, I was surprised by a small grouping of negative reviews for Children of Apollo, and since it was one of his books I... Read more
Published on July 5, 2012 by SusieB
5.0 out of 5 stars Finally! An Alternate History Book Where Things Turn Out Better.
I'm a big fan of alternate history. But a huge problem for me is that virtually all alternative history ultimately has things turning out worse than they did in the timeline we're... Read more
Published on March 11, 2012 by Dayton Lavon Kitchens
1.0 out of 5 stars Just What I Expected
I decided to pick this book up after reading a few of Whittington's social commentary posts Really should have kept my money. Read more
Published on February 28, 2012 by ansonee
5.0 out of 5 stars A good read
This is an exciting book to read. I identified with Wendy because I've always wanted to walk on the moon. Read more
Published on January 10, 2012 by D. Calcote
1.0 out of 5 stars amaturish
read a friend's e-book. This author uses false logic in arguments or political allegories and is full of grammatical errors...
Published on January 9, 2012 by pvv38
1.0 out of 5 stars Worst ever
Don't waste your money. This book is nearly impossible to read. It's as if the writer is fumbling with a newly learned language. Read more
Published on January 7, 2012 by jaym724
1.0 out of 5 stars They will print anything these days!
I'll be short and sweet. Years ago, you would go through scrutiny before getting published. Thank goodness the book was in the stack of already read paperbacks at work. Read more
Published on January 7, 2012 by G.V. Mielko
1.0 out of 5 stars Lackluster
It was difficult to get past all of the errors and the plot is a little weak without much of an ending. Read more
Published on January 7, 2012 by Liz D.
Search Customer Reviews

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.


Have something you'd like to share about this product?
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for Similar Items by Category