16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Engaging, Earnest, New Insights, a Great Contribution, February 22, 2010
This review is from: China Safari: On the Trail of Beijing's Expansion in Africa (Hardcover)
Of the modest number of books focused on China in Africa, this is one of the two best, and both are unique--if you buy only one, at least read my summary of the other,
China into Africa: Trade, Aid, and Influence Whereas this book is direct journalism with wonderful color photos and direct ground-truth stories, China Into Africa is a best in class collection of academic essays.
Sixteen full pages of color photos in the middle of the book were unexpected and a complete delight.
On balance between the two books, this one taught me more and provided insights I could not get elsewhere to include the clear understanding, documented across multiple encounters by the authors, that the Chinese consider any Chinese business area or housing area of, by, and for their Chinese workers, to be sovereign territory of China immune to indigenous inspection or intervention.
Highpoints for me:
+ Africa is undergoing a huge transformation, and in combination, the infusion of Chinese infrastructure with the discovery of new energy fields and the growing need of all for what Africa has, is creating a perfect environment for a wealth explosion, and the US is missing it.
+ US has given up in Africa, in large part because the US Government other than the military does not have the resources, the human capital, the area knowledge, or the innate interest to actually do something strategic. The Chinese, in contrast, are unifying and pacifying Africa with infrastructure and commerce, while gaining direct access to natural resources that they can take possession of at half the market value by controlling the supply chain and no doubt lying about how much they are extracting.
+ Chinese presence in Africa is vertically and horizontally integrated, to include relatively thorough exploitation of what I have named the eight tribes of intelligence (academic, citizen-civil sector, commercial, government, law enforcement, media, military, and non-governmental), the Chinese appear to be way ahead of the US and all others in the Information Operations (IO) domain.
+ The Chinese are introducing simple robust technologies that work and that can be understood by indigenous workers accustomed to 1950's and 1960's technologies. Chinese machines that do equivalent work to Western machines are four times cheaper
+ China handles indigenous requests for Chinese visas strategically--they quickly recognize the local movers and shakers and give them red carpet treatment, unlike Europeans and US where the consular office has no clue and treats everybody badly
+ Chinese study every Minister they need, then assign a Ministerial-level contact from China to visit, cultivate, and then keep in touch--this is so far ahead of the US light-weight approach it makes me want to cry
Some of my flyleaf notes:
+ 900 Chinese companies active across Africa
+ 750,000 Chinese immigrants in South Africa ALONE
+ Cameroon is processing 700,000 visa requests in its Beijing Embassy
+ 300 million Chinese emigrants to Africa is a stated long-term goal
+ Core Chinese approach is a win-win package deal that trades infrastructure and unconditional loans for resource futures--they are approaching each nation strategically and far superior to US and European incoherence. West focuses on humanitarian and other broad issues, Chinese focus on business and longer term win
+ Chinese are beating the West on price and performance every time, to the point that Western firms are starting to bid Chinese subcontractors.
+ Africa and Chinese appear to share a view of democracy as being where everyone decides and no one works
+ Chinese get more out of everything, to include penny pinching, working all facilities and machines 24/7 with shifts, and completely avoiding "distractions" of local engagement outside of business to business dealings
+ NGOs are viewed by the Chinese in Africa as Western tools seeking to harass and set back the Chinese
+ Chinese laborers can earn five times in Africa what they can in China--$500 a month versus $100 a month
+ China is consuming 32% of the world's rice, 47% of the world's cement, 33% of the world's cigarettes, and 10% of the world's lumber but growing rapidly
+ 91,000 Chinese tourists visited Egypt in 2007
+ Chinese goods in Africa sell for one quarter to one fifth what the African's own products sell for
+ China close to #1 in small arms sales in Africa
+ China using private security firms, up to 5,000 individuals (probably Chinese) guarding one pipeline
+ Chinese farmers in Sudan growing vegetables for sale to the large Chinese population there, making ten times what they could at home
+ Darfur is the size of France, oil there, China poised to own Sudan, which is growing 9-13% a year
+ Ethiopia has China's biggest Embassy after India
+ Washington's China watchers fall into two camps according to the authors, the Panda Huggers and the Dragon Slayers. It is clear to me as a reader and intelligence professional that neither group has a strategic analytic model or any sense of what US should be doing and why, in Africa
+ Land mines and minefields do not slow down Chinese work. They use bulldozers to set off the mines, if a worker dies their family gets a $44,000 windfall and everyone is happy
+ Chinese created economic zones in Africa that appear to be phantom zones and a tax avoidance scheme, but Africa does not have a regional means of studying and then challenging Chinese moves of this sort
+ In Zambia Chinese treat local workers the way Israelis treat the Palestinians
+ The major regional downside is Chinese deforestation and over-fishing. Bribery appears to negate whatever NGO and national constraints may be in place.
The major downside of China in Africa that came up over and over was the total shut out of local workers who gain no employment, no training, no future.
I found this book fascinating, and give it five stars for the hard work of doing ground truth face to face across multiple continents, and the photos, and the deeper personal insights than provided by the academic work. My notes do not do this book justice, if I had to recommend only one of the two, this would be the one.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Somewhat Useful -, August 10, 2009
This review is from: China Safari: On the Trail of Beijing's Expansion in Africa (Hardcover)
"China Safari" summarizes the meanderings of three French reporters through Africa and to a conference on Africa in Beijing. The bad news is that they lacked high-level contacts or access to good statistical sources, and their account rambles; despite these limitations, however, the book provides some useful information, summarized in the following.
China has taken France's place as Africa's second largest business partner, and is closing in on the number one position - held by the U.S. In late 2006, an estimated 750,000 Chinese were resident across the entire African continent. One of China's main attractions to African nations is that it has not gotten involved in local politics like the U.S. and the Word Bank have; on the other hand, the authors claim that China is gradually realizing that its visible support of certain dictators may backfire and is now pressuring Sudan and Zimbabwe.
Another reason the Chinese are popular with local governments is that they don't just export raw materials, as American companies have been prone to do. For example, instead of just exporting bauxite like Alcoa, the Chinese are also funding a hydroelectric dam, a railroad, and a refinery - creating many more jobs as well as valuable infrastructure.
Chinese bidders are generally successful thanks to their low labor costs and low overheads - eg. managers stay with workers in work camps, not at the Hilton Hotel. In addition, Chinese machines cost about one-fourth that of European ones, and Chinese workers toil seven days/week, plus overtime as needed to keep on schedule.
Typical Chinese workers in Africa sign an eight-page contract to work 18 months, followed by one month of home leave. Those choosing to work through their home leave entitlement are paid double for that period. Workers can extend their contract for an additional two years, and possibly save $15,000 - $20,000 overall. (Room and board are provided.) The question of why Chinese laborers are hired, instead of 100% local Africans, is not answered, unfortunately.
Probably one reason is the low opinion the Chinese have of African workers - repeatedly one reads that they are "very lazy," or words to that effect. Reading that Africans complain that they're hit when they make mistakes suggests another bone of contention. The authors also note that Africans are not paid for vacations nor even medical costs for on-the-job injuries.
Finally, I like countless others, have been chagrined to find American tourist site souvenirs made in China - even at Native-American sites. Similarly, the Chinese have largely displaced African souvenir producers.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very valuable perspective-- well worth reading, December 20, 2009
This review is from: China Safari: On the Trail of Beijing's Expansion in Africa (Hardcover)
This book is a must-read for anyone trying to understand China or Africa, or both as is the case for me. I put on both my "analyst hat" and my "Africa-lover/environmentalist" hat while reading this book and found it fascinating.
The book shifts gracefully between observations on how China's government and people are ambitiously pushing for economic growth and a route out of poverty, and how Africa's different governments are capitalizing on China's need for resources. China's people and its companies are out for whatever is best for China, consequences be damned. In my work role as analyst looking at the impact of China's growth on western companies, I see this again and again. Environmental consequences of growth are of little concern. At the same time, China's workers are willing to make sacrifices in order to provide for their families that wouldn't be acceptable to workers in the more prosperous West.
The bottom line: China needs resources: minerals, timber, food commodities. And in order to gain secure long-term access to these resources, government policy supports companies as they build roads, train lines and ports in order to extract the resources they need. The local governments see cash coming in-- and infrastructure being built-- and the Chinese see access to the resources it needs. Corruption naturally follows, and from the book's commentary there doesn't seem to be much long-term sustainable benefit to Africans from the resources trade. No sustainable manufacturing-based employment is created, no skills are learned or improvement in quality of life despite billions in cash coming in.
The side effects can be severe. Chinese government policy is focused on "what's good for China. Companies turn a blind eye to the human rights or environmental fallout that may follow their influx of cash. And the book states that the two-sided trade can include shipments of weapons from China into the country that can now afford their goods thanks to commodity-related cash flow. In my trips to Rwanda this year, I never thought about who manufactured the machetes and rifles used in the genocides-- this book notes that most were Chinese-made.
The book describes the horror of Darfur and the Chinese economic support of Sudan's government. Roads, oil pipelines, drilling equipment and port capacity are all funded by Chinese oil companies as they pump oil out of Sudan's desert. Does your pension plan own stock in PetroChina? Worth asking.
Are China's actions in Africa worse than those of European colonists? Hard to tell. In most cases, European countries left Africans without functioning political systems, with an uneducated population, with historical ethnic or tribal conflicts exacerbated by arbitrarily drawn borders, with no new infrastructure built and setting countries up for a legacy of failure. And the IMF, World Bank and the UN can be hamstrung by politics and can inadvertently create problems worse than the ones they're trying to solve. So it's probably too soon to judge China. At least the African countries are getting some infrastructure built!
It is well worth watching this space to see how China's influence affects political development in various African countries, and to see if China will bow to world pressure to be a "better actor" in areas of human rights and environmentalism. Meanwhile, I'll keep expanding our greeting card business [...] which is dedicated to using our photos to raise money for organizations that preserve the environment and support economic development and human rights in Africa. At the same time I will continue to work full-time to help western institutional investors understand the geopolitical consequences of China's rampant growth--in hopes that a better balance can be struck.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
