11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Austrian-based cost theory, October 15, 2004
This review is from: Cost and Choice (Collected Works of James M Buchanan) (Paperback)
The word "cost" means something different in a context of making a choice than it does in a context of budgeting or in a context of accounting. Buchanan argues that within the context of making a choice, orthodox economics employs an inaccurate meaning of the word cost. This book is an attempt to develop the correct meaning of the concept of cost within a context of choice.
Buchanan defines cost as "that which the decision-taker sacrifices or gives up when he makes a choice. It consists in his own evaluation of the enjoyment or utility that he anticipates having to forego as a result of selection among alternative courses of action" (p. 41).
Buchanan's notion of cost within a setting of choice is one of opportunity cost. His argument builds on the concept of cost developed in Austrian economics (Carl Menger, E. Böhm-Bawerk, F. von Wieser), and even more so by scholars at the London School of Economics (Lionel Robbins, Friedrich A. von Hayek, Ronald Coase during the 1930s, G.F. Thirlby and Jack Wiseman during the 1950s). It differs from the notion of cost of classical economists (Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Thomas Malthus) in two main ways.
* In classical and neoclassical economics, cost is based on units of resource input during the production process (ch. 1). The value of goods in exchange is then determined by the relative costs of their production (Adam Smith' famous example that a beaver should fetch twice as much in the market as a deer, because it costs twice as much labor to kill a beaver as it costs to kill a deer). Buchanan, on the other hand, defines cost as that given up when making a choice. He prefers marginal-utility economics (cf. William Stanley Jevons, Carl Menger, Leon Walras), according to which exchange value is determined by marginal utility, or demand.
* In classical economics, cost can be objectively measured. Under the Austrian-London-Buchanan concept of cost, on the other hand, cost is subjective, in that it is different for each decision maker (p. 23). "In an unchanging economic environment populated by purely economic men, the two approaches become identical in a superficial sense. In a universe where all behavior is not purely economic, where genuine choice takes place, the important differences emerge with clarity." (p. 25)
Thus, "[i]n a theory of choice, cost must be reckoned in a utility dimension. In the orthodox predictive theory, however, cost is reckoned in a commodity dimension." (p. 41)
Short as the book is, it could have been even shorter. Lots of the second half is barely interesting (ch. 4-6, which are applications of Buchanan's cost theory to, respectively, public finance, Pigovian welfare norms, and nonmarket decision-making; sounds promising but it simply gets too tedious). This would have worked better in a shorter, long paper-length version.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Clarity and Brevity, September 9, 2000
Cost and Choice is a short, easy, and informative read on opportunity cost. Some of the classical economists hinted at the idea of opportunity cost. Opportunity cost thinking can be seen in the work of Ricardo and Bastiat. Yet the labor cost doctrine held its sway over economic thinking until Carl Menger demolished it. Menger's student Weiser developed the idea of alternative costs, but how did this idea get to England?
Buchanan describes the development of the `London tradition' at the LSE. Thirlby, Coase, Hayek, and Robbins were all involved in developing the modern opportunity cost doctrine. Buchanan also inquires into the idea of social costs and public choice. The idea of opportunity cost is, of course, at the center of the socialist calculation debate. The opportunity cost concept raises a number of issues as far as the Coase theorem and public goods theory are concerned. Who chooses over what alternatives in the public sector?
Cost and Choice is a great book to use in undergraduate microeconomics. Some grad students should read it too: especially those who majored in engineering or one of the physical sciences as undergrads. It is also a worthwhile read for the educated public.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Disentangling the Idea of Opportunity Cost, February 6, 2010
This review is from: Cost and Choice (Collected Works of James M Buchanan) (Paperback)
I am not an economist, but do have a masters degree in political science. As such, I am relatively familiar with cost theory in economics and reasonably familiar with the "Austrian school" of economics's subjective theory of value/cost. Even though I am not an economist, I found this book (except for the final two chapters) quite clearly written and explained. Buchanan certainly isn't writing for a popular audience (and it is not a popular subject), but his writing was easy enough for me to understand without a full-on econ background.
As others mention, this book explains and expands on the subjective theory of costs. Simply stated, economists of the classical sort liked to think of 'cost' and 'value' in objective terms - 'cost' referring to the measurable expenditure. Thus, the opportunity cost for buying a candy bar is simply all of the other financial options the buyer forgoes in spending that money here, rather than another place.
Buchanan's book first recaps the history of thinking about cost and the gradual emergence of a subjective theory of cost. Under the subjective theory that Buchanan endorses, cost means basically any opportunity that buyer anticipates giving up for sake of the choice being made. In other words, instead of the cost of a candy bar being limited to anything else the buyer could have bought for the price, it can also include such things as the anticipated disappointment when one weighs oneself the following morning or the dissatisfaction that comes with knowing that one broke their diet. So as not to sound frivolous, the reason these are actual costs is because, in a very real way, they are things the chooser considers when making their choice. As the very word 'choice' implies that there is a weighing of pros and cons, any 'cons' that the chooser anticipates are opportunity costs.
As other reviewers mention, I am not sure how necessary the last two chapters were. They are quite hard to follow and seemed more suited to a separate essay where themes from this book are put into practical contexts.
All in all, Cost and Choice gave me a lot to think about. Buchanan is a good explainer and arguer and provides a very rich history of the evolution of "opportunity cost" as a concept. Good book for those interested in the subjective theory of cost and the microeconomic idea of opportunity cost in general.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
