Everyone I introduced the Christian Science Monitor to initially laughs, "A Christian news magazine?" No, no, no! Believe me when I say that I would never subscribe to a religious news source. Though run by the Church of Christian Science, the former newspaper (sad loss), now magazine actually has a 100 year old charter stating that NO editorial control can be exercised by the owners. You can't even say that about news organizations owned by corporations. Not only is the CSM completely untouched by religious dogma, this totally independent publication is downright humanist and one could even say left-leaning. The Church pretty much said, "Here's a newspaper, you're on your own."
The Monitor is as related to Christianity as Time Magazine is to clocks. Filled with Pulitzer Prize winning journalism, you will find no "soft ball" news here. You will NOT find articles like "Superman Turns 50", or covers bearing the image of new consumer products. No advertising disguised as news. During the Iraq War, when sources like the NYTimes and CNN had "embedded" journalists riding along with the military, feeding approved, whitewashed news, CSM stuck themselves on the streets of Baghdad.
Better than Time.
Better than Newsweek.
Even better than The Economist.
If you took the 'Christian Science' out of the name, someone reading it may think it was a publication of NPR, but better.
Don't believe it? Go buy a single issue. Oh and there's a reason it's comparatively expensive (psst, it's cheaper through their website): it's *NON-PROFIT*. This means that subscribers pay for the journalism, not advertisers. You think Time could charge $20 per year without all the advertising? You're paying for the news, not Pfizer or Walt Disney.