8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Scholastic Analysis of Cyril's Alexandrine Patristic Thought, December 4, 2004
"The centrality of the Logos as the only and single hypostasis, must always be seen as the source of life and power." G. Bebawi
A Scholastic Monograph:
"Dr. Welch has chosen for his monograph, a topic that requires more investigation, especially during the present revival of Patristic studies. Initially, one must warn the reader against a scholastic and Western understanding of Patristic writings, resumes Dr. Bebawi(Cantab/ Nottingham), because scripture does not explain itself, as the scholastic method would have it. It is the rule of faith, or the canon of truth according to Irenaeus. This was called, as early as Athanasius of Alexandria, the 'scope' of the scripture."
Cyril on John's Gospel:
In the introduction and first chapter Dr. Welch discusses the date and chronology of Cyril's commentary on the Gospel of John, he deals with the fundamental theological presuppositions and exegetical principles as the background for his study. He presents a concise summary of the works and studies of St. Cyril utilizing available sources from late 19th century to the present time. He seems unaware of an English study, published in Athens by Fr. Dr. G. Dragas, an Athanasian Expert; 'St. Athanasius Contra Apollinarem', challenging the Logos-sarx christology, devoting over 100 pages to the 'human soul'in Christ (pp. 289-398)
Christological Clarifications:
a. The significance of the existence of a human soul in Christ prior to the rise of Anselm's atonement theories.
b. What are the roots of the idea of satisfaction on the ransom payment paid to the Father by the Son on the cross?
The Alexandrian fathers Athanasius and Cyril never treated Christ sacrifice, the same way the middle ages scholastics did. It is not in the passion of jesus pain and suffering that our redemption was affected, it is his victory over death and corruption. Dr. Welch uses the sacrifice of Jesus and similar terms , without engaging in the debate on the essence of our redemption, ignoring throughout his study a central aspect of Cyril's Soteriology. The English translation of Cyrils commentary on John renders it as the 'transelmented flesh of Christ', that takes place in Christ Himself, as a consequential result of the hypostatic union of His Divinity with his humanity, "in a matter unspeakable, and surpassing any human understanding, the Logos united to his own flesh and having, as it were, transformed it all into Himself."
Expert's Conclusion:
"For the rest, the book is more than useful. It provides the reader with an analysis of key subjects and an up-to-date bibliography. However, it does not challenge the studies of... W. Burghardt; 'The Image of God in man, according to Cyril of Alexandria, Waverly press, Baltimore, 1957) on the various meanings of sanctification in the commentary on john, and the other works of cyril. This could have offered an insight into the eucharistic theology of St. Cyril." G.H.B., Ph.D., Cantab, (Quoted from Coptic Church Review, vol. 15, No. 4, Winter 1994)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No