| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
We live in as pivotal and defining an age as the Great Depression or the Sixtiesa period whose definition, say some cultural observers, includes a warning of the churchs influence.
The result? A society measurably less religious but decidedly more spiritual. Less influenced by authority than by experience. More attuned to images than to words.
How does the church adapt to such a culture? Or should it, in fact, eschew adapting for maintaining a course it has followed these last two millennia? Or something in between?
These are exactly the questions asked in The Church In Emerging Culture by five Christian thinker-speaker-writers, each who advocate unique stances regarding what the churchs message should be (and what methods should be used to present it) as it journeys through this evolving, postmodern era. The authors are:
Andy CrouchRe:Generation Quarterly editor-in-chief Michael Hortonprofessor and reformed theologian Frederica Mathewes-Greenauthor, commentator, and Orthodox Christian Brian D. McLarenpostmodernist, author, pastor, and Emergent senior fellow Erwin Raphael McManusauthor and pastor of the innovative and interethnic L.A.-based church, Mosaic
Most unique about their individual positions is that theyre presented not as singular essays but as lively discussions in which the other four authors freely (and frequently) comment, critique, and concur. That element, coupled with a unique photographic design that reinforces the depth of their at-once congenial and feisty conversation, gives you all-access entrée into this groundbreaking discourse.
Whats more, general editor Leonard Sweet (author of SoulTsunami and AquaChurch, among several other acclaimed texts) frames the thought-provoking dialogue with a profoundly insightful, erudite introductory essaypractically a book within a book.
The Church In Emerging Culture is foundational reading for leaders and serious students of all denominations and church styles.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
An Irritating Conversation I Couldn't Finish,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Church in Emerging Culture: Five Perspectives (Paperback)
I picked up this book because I've read a lot about Brian McLaren and the emergent church, but I haven't read much actually written by this group. This book seemed like a good place to start, as it collects thoughts from both McLaren and Sweet, and D.A. Carson references it a few times in Becoming Conversant with the Emerging Church: Understanding a Movement and Its Implications. The basic set-up is that Sweet hosts a gathering of five people with a variety of perspectives on what the church should look like in contemporary culture. The nature of the conversation is kind of an emergent church parlor trick, and Sweet's introduction is heavily weighted toward praising the virtues of a church that is willing to create new methods and messages, but other views were presented with fairness and respect, I think.The format, though, is what put me off and convinced me to give up on the book. I will paraphrase it here: Introduction - SWEET: I am going to babble on for a while with tortured metaphors and flowery language that reveals a certain paralyzing intellectual insecurity. No joke, I am going to describe gardens and glens and parks and meadows with dragons with theological stings in their tails. Conversation 1 - CROUCH: So, there's postmodernism (MCLAREN: I need to jump in every three or four sentences to write a paragraph or two about my thoughts. I disagree with your definition of postmodernism, as you mean it to say "Everything I don't like today," while I think it should mean "Everything I DO like today, except where that ties me to an argument I don't want to support."), and it's like the Mall of America. But if churches would just take the sacraments more seriously (MATHEWES-GREEN: This is the part where I just can't restrain myself from sharing a humorous observation. Not something that would actually make you laugh, more like the kind of "Aren't we humorous" observation that is popular on NPR. Oh, and I am frequently disappointed that people don't take the Orthodox Church into consideration when discussing the church as a whole in United States society.)(MCMANUS: Hey man, I really like you, I do. I think you're totally wrong on a lot of things, like your assumption that appreciation of sacraments is the magical cure for everything that ails the church, but I really care for you.)(HORTON: I'm Reformed! My comments don't really connect to anything you've written, but I want you to know I'm REFO-O-O-O-RMED!)(MCLAREN: This is another one of those points in the discussion where I am going to be infuriatingly correct. Crouch makes so many generalizations that it is easy for me to accurately point them out. This will certainly frustrate a reader who is not inclined to agree with me as a matter of principle. And no, I don't think Sweet's editorial position has anything to do with me being the one in position to hit every softball that Crouch lobs.), then we would be just fine (MCLAREN: Please, allow me to share a few sentences about what I think the terms "just fine" should mean. I like to share.). ME: I'm giving up on this book.
13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A little annoying, but mostly interesting...,
By
This review is from: The Church in Emerging Culture: Five Perspectives (Paperback)
Two comments have already been made, but I would like to reiterate. The light gray, italicized, 6 pt font used for interjections by other authors during an essay is hard to read. McLaren talks way too much, especially when he says the same thing over and over and takes EVERYTHING personally. He thinks his point of view is the only one worth having, and seems rather arrogant in his intellect.Having said the few negatives, it is overall a good read. I would love to hear a more detailed view of what each author truly believes church should be like (which I know most of them have been published and anyone could read what they've written elsewhere). It also seems that the only real discrepancies are in their view of what "postmodernism" really is. As far as the actual workings of church, they could probably find a lot of common ground. But, they give very little actual advice on what church should be like. Overall, it is an interesting book full of interesting ideas about the current culture. Leonard Sweet's introduction must be read to truly understand the rest of the book, but it gets a little too flowery at times.
11 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Dialogue on Christ & Culture,
By rodboomboom (Dearborn, Michigan United States) - See all my reviews (VINE VOICE) (HALL OF FAME REVIEWER)
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Church in Emerging Culture: Five Perspectives (Paperback)
Here are six individuals, actually five participants and one moderator/editor who tackle between themselves the topic of what does Christ do in changing, emerging cultures.As reviewers have pointed out, salient to this dialogue is the method exhibited of each of five providing essay, then other four comment as it seems at will. The essayist than at the end responds to this sprinkled comments. Of course, one of my confession would lean towards Horton, who certainly wins the day with his comments seeking return to text and history, rather than inventiveness and questioning always from our cultural arrogance stance. Useful to see contrasts. Too much of McLaren. Would like to seen more "orthodox" participants in line of Horton.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|