Customer Reviews


16 Reviews
5 star:
 (11)
4 star:
 (3)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


33 of 34 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A tour de force
It is amazing how much the author can pack into 400 pages, The writing is clear and entertaining, leavened by anecdotes and sketches of some very famous economists. Yet the author covers hotly debated issues in enough depth that the reader can understand what the opposing positions were, and why people held them. This is particularly important to a lay reader, as some...
Published on May 28, 2012 by George Hariton

versus
3 of 8 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting
Good synthesis of 20th Century economic ideas and debates. A very good and entertaining read. And a great addition to one's library on Economics.
Published 20 months ago by Pedro J. Quintanilla


‹ Previous | 1 2 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

33 of 34 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A tour de force, May 28, 2012
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
It is amazing how much the author can pack into 400 pages, The writing is clear and entertaining, leavened by anecdotes and sketches of some very famous economists. Yet the author covers hotly debated issues in enough depth that the reader can understand what the opposing positions were, and why people held them. This is particularly important to a lay reader, as some positions may seem so weird that an uninformed reader may wonder why anyone could reasonably hold them. After White's explanations, they become plausible, even if not convincing to a twenty-first century reader.

To take just one example, Hayek long advocated privatization of money, i.e. government should get out of the business of printing (or minting) money and let competing private sector issuers do it. Sounds absurd, but White shows the logic in terms that can be understood by a lay reader, and that might be informative to a professional economist.

While White covers a great many issues, the common thread is the scope of government versus the scope of private enterprise and market forces. Thus at one extreme Oskar Lange claimed that, now that we had computers (written around 1950), bureaucrats could calculate a proper price for everything and there is no need for free markets to set prices (or for any other reason). At the other extreme, James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock argue that governments usually act to please special interests, including bureaucrats and certain producers, at the expense of the general taxpayer.

The centerpiece of the book, however, is the argument between Keynes and Hayek, as to whether government should massively intervene when the ec0onomy turns down, or whether market forces should be allowed to play out. This is a crucial debate today among both economists and policy-makers. White's account of Keynes and Hayek sheds welcome light on the issues. Indeed, one can compare this book with Nicholas Wapshott's account of the same clash. While Wapshott writes at greater length, and covers much more of the politics, White does a much better job of getting at the economic principles behind each position (and that are still in play today)..
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


32 of 34 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A book just as relevant now as it was when the debates it discusses took place, April 25, 2012
A great book. The debate over ideas between Keynes and Hayek during the 1930s couldn't be more relevant to the current discussion on the recent recession and the right economic policy to get the economy going again. Pick up a copy of the New York Times and the arguments couldn't be more similar. But this isn't a dry book, you see the lively debates and the personalities behind them with lots of interesting personal facts sprinkled in. You learn not only the arguments that were made, but which ones the partisans in these battles regretted that they made and what they learned from their mistakes. White is one of the few people who could bring together such a broad range of sources together in such a readable way.

The book is much broader than the Great Depression covering everything from the debate over the proper role of government in the great Socialist Calculation debate to free trade to the debates behind what White entitles "The Growth of Government" (though this chapter was much too short).

I still have my criticisms. For example, I would have included a lot more economists in some of these debates, and I think that it is arbitrary who is given credit for making some arguments. For example, Donald Wittman's discussions about the efficiency of Democracies ignores the fact that Gary Becker had already made the central argument in 1976 in the JLE (of course, there were other less well known economists such as Earl Thompson who made a whole career making these arguments and published some of them in the JPE). And the book has a strong GMU bias in terms of which arguments it considers. And I disagree with some of the arguments.

But despite those minor quibbles, it is a strong book that is well worth the read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


17 of 19 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Easy reading to get a background on key macroeconomic issues during the 20th century, May 29, 2012
By 
Jackal (New Hampshire) - See all my reviews
The chapters highlight key historical events (eg Great Depression in the 30s, German strong growth in the 50/60s, stagflation in the 70s). Each chapter also introduces some economists and their ideas aimed at dealing with the problem at hand. While the book chapters are chronological, the economists and their ideas are only roughly chronological. Sometimes a chapter backtracks to introduce the ideas of older economists. The overall structure of the book works very well.

The economic explanations are not very complicated and you do not need any background in economics to understand the book (except probably when it comes to discussions about interest rates). This is both a strength (large potential audience) and a weakness (only scratches the surface). Actually, I think the book would be ideal for readers interested in social/intellectual history. A good overview is achieved by digesting this book. There are also loads of useful references to the seminal works in the history of economic thought. It is also not bad for people with economic training who what a historical perspective - and that really should include all macroeconomists. Then it will serve as a great first reader (and you can subsequently follow the numerous references to find the original sources).

Alternatives:
- This book compares favourable to Blaug's Economic Theory in Retrospect. Blaug's book is much more detailed when it comes to economic theory, but does not have the somewhat broader economic history focus. Blaug's book is originally written decades ago and some of the details are no longer that relevant. So while an economist (or economic historian) might prefer Blaug's book, an historian would prefer the current book. For the causal reading the choice is clearly the current book.
- The Evolution of Macroeconomic Theory and Policy also has chapters based on historical events, but its focus is on economic theory. Thus this is a very different book, which I rate at three stars.
- Competing Schools of Economic Thought, in contrast, has chapters focused on key historical economists, starting with Adam Smith. The focus is on these giants (similar to Blaug) and not much historical context is given. I have only skimmed this book, but it is neither great nor awful.

The writing style is rather informal, but somewhat uneven. In general, the text should have been edited more meticulously. Still, it is almost an entertaining reading. Unfortunately, the author/printer has messed up the section headings in the book; no distinction made between broad section headings and more narrow headings. So at times the headings turn out to be misleading. Irritating, but you get used to it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent for both novices and experts, May 14, 2012
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
There is a great deal to like about this book. Prof. White obviously put a great deal of effort into distilling each topic into a summary that captures the essence of the topic in 20 to 30 pages without oversimplifying. The result is one of those rare books that can serve both novices and trained economists. Novices will benefit from prose that draws the reader forward without jargon. Many terms that may be unfamiliar to beginners are defined. Experts will at least pick up a few nuggets, and can draw inspiration from the superb writing.

Highly recommended. A paperback edition is available for about $45 if I remember right.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Great Read, June 5, 2012
The Clash of Economic Ideas is a great read. It's an accessible telling of some of the major battles in economic theory. And it holds interest due to it's relation to historical events going on at the time of each of these battles. Rather than staying in the high theory of economics, Dr. White shows how ideas turn into real policies and vice versa. I definitely recommend this book to anyone who is curious as to why economics and economic policy look the way they do today.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars An extremely stimulating summary of economic thought, April 4, 2013
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
I never thought an economic textbook would be this enjoyable and thought provoking. This is a powerful compendium of contrasting thinkers that have the ability to change the course of nations for better or worse. This book's educational value far exceeds the cover price.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars I give this book an A++, March 4, 2013
This review is from: The Clash of Economic Ideas (Kindle Edition)
This book is an excellent overview of economics. It covers much of the theoretical background behind the on-going conflicts in Economic Theory and brings it up to date through 2010 Obamanomics. Watch out !!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars A thorough, though somewhat biased, overview of the subject, November 23, 2013
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
If you want to understand the debates that are raging in Washington today over economic policy you really do need to read this book. It does a good job of outlining the historical development of the various contending schools of thought in economics, and illustrating just how they differ in their analysis of how the economy works and their prescription for what the government ought to do in order to keep the economy running smoothly.

The only shortcomings that I found with this book were: (a) the absence of a concluding chapter that succinctly summarizes the wealth of highly complex information provided throughout the book, and (b) the author's clear bias against Keynesianism (and, to a lesser extent, against monetarism as well) in favor of the so-called "Austrian school" of Mises and Hayek. A book on a controversial subject such as this deserves a more evenhanded treatment. Perhaps it would have been better for the book to have been co-written by two or more economists representing different schools of thought; at the very least, the author should have invited a Keynesian and a monetarist to respond to his arguments, including their comments in boxes scattered throughout the text or else in an appendix at the end.

But apart from the author's obvious bias and the lack of a summary chapter to tie all of his arguments together, this book is well worth reading for anyone interested in economic theory or in the politics of economic policy. I'd recommend it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars superb history, June 22, 2013
By 
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Clash of Economic Ideas (Kindle Edition)
This is an engaging and detailed history of economic thought, in particular the debate between the Keynesians and the Austrians. The author is on the Austrian side but he represents both sides of the debate very clearly. There is also considerable depth of historical detail, tracing the development of ideas from the 18th and 19th centuries.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Topnotch overview, June 1, 2013
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Clash of Economic Ideas (Kindle Edition)
This could be, in a way, a central text for college, That is, if most college economics teachers were willing to let an intellectual debate occur between statist-oriented economists and free-market economists. It is so full of ideas about how the world economy should or could work that it offers a very stimulating introduction to the field of economics. It could make Econ 102 an exciting course, rather than a snoozer.
In any case, an excellent primer on the important issues of money creation, trade, interest rates, central banks, etc.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 2 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

Details

The Clash of Economic Ideas
The Clash of Economic Ideas by Lawrence H. White
$21.99
Add to wishlist See buying options
Search these reviews only
Rate and Discover Movies
Send us feedback How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you? Let us know here.