Most Helpful Customer Reviews
20 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Awesome!, November 15, 2005
After months of waiting I bought the premium leather (calfskin) black ESV. I will use this space to physically describe this Bible, as there are a plethera of reviews about the ESV translation here, and you can read more.
I uploaded two pictures: One with the Bible closed, and one with it open so you could see the quality as well as the relative size and typeface
This Bible is the perfect size to carry, hold and the leather is soft and supple. It is smyth sewn, and bound beautifully. The typeset is very readable...a 9.5 font I believe.
The reason I did not give it 5 stars is that there is a little bleed through or ghosting on the pages. I would prefer to see a thicker paper.
That said, it is beautifully done Bible with center column cross reference, short book introductions, a good concordance and color maps.
I love the size and feel of this Bible! It also has two ribbon markers.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
28 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Bible I've been waiting 25 years for!, November 4, 2002
This review is from: ESV Classic Reference Bible, Genuine Leather, Black, Red Letter Text, Thumb Indexed (Leather Bound)
The English Standard Version is the best Bible available today to the English-speaking church. As an "essentially literal" translation, the ESV seeks to capture the precise wording of the original text, letting the reader see as directly as possible the structure and meaning of the original words of scripture. In contrast to the ESV, many modern Bible versions have followed a thought-for-thought translation philosophy called "dynamic equivalence" rather than the "essentially literal" meaning of the original. The New Living Translation (NLT), The Message, and other paraphrased Bibles are "dynamic equivalent" versions. A thought-for-thought translation is of necessity more inclined to reflect the interpretive opinions of the translator and the influences of contemporary culture. The NIV, the Bible I have used for most of the past 25 years, is a trade-off between the essentially literal and dynamic equivalence approaches to translation. I have found the ESV a significantly superior translation. The ESV also stands in the classic mainstream of the English Bible that began with William Tyndale's New Testament of 1526 and the King James Version of 1611. That stream continued in the American Standard Version of 1901 (ASV) and the Revised Standard Version of 1952 and 1971 (RSV). When Crossway Books recently bought the rights to the RSV, they assembled a team of 100 respected biblical scholars who started with the RSV text and carefully weighed each word and phrase against the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, to ensure the fullest accuracy and clarity. The translators are all outstanding scholars who are deeply committed to the authority and inerrancy of scripture. The ESV retains the beauty and dignity of the Tyndale-King James legacy, while providing the English reader with an accurate rendering of the original Biblical text. The arrival of the ESV gives us a readable, modern English translation that is as faithful as possible to the original words of scripture. After careful consideration, I have adopted the English Standard Version for my own Bible study and preaching, and I enthusiastically recommend it to you, believing that the ESV is literally the best Bible available today to the English-speaking church.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very Close to the Original Greek, December 18, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: ESV Classic Reference Bible, Genuine Leather, Black, Red Letter Text, Thumb Indexed (Leather Bound)
I just did an indepth study of the book of John. One of the commentaries used was the NICNT by D.A. Carson, which comments on the NIV. In every case where Dr. Carson disagreed with the NIV, and proposed a different, literal translation, the ESV translated the phrase in exactly that way. In fact, I began to think the Dr. Carson served on the translation committee (he didn't, I checked). Bottom line: I like this translation better than the other "literal" translation, the NASB, because it reads better, and it's much more accurate than the "thought by thought" translation of the NIV. I use it for my personal study and teaching, but not exclusively. It's always good to review several tranlations, especially if you don't read Greek.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|