Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good, just a little wordy at times,
By
This review is from: Classical Apologetics (Paperback)
This was a rather intense read about classical apologetics. I would highly recommend it to those that have an interest or prior knowledge and understanding of apologetics. The book is divided into three sections: --Classical Natural Theology, an overview of problem and method --Classical apologetics, the theistic proofs, the deity of Christ, and the infallibility of scripture --Classical critique of presuppositional apologetics The first section seemed very wordy to me, and I had a hard time getting through it. The second was very interesting, and providing a great summary of different arguments, including the ontological, cosmological and teleological arguments for God. This chapter also has chapters dealing with the Spirit and Word of God. The third section is probably the best section (although it still lacked brevity). Chapter 11 is the best chapter in the book; it has great summaries of Luther, Calvin, and Augustine's views on reason as it relates to faith. All should check out this chapter.
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not what I would expect from their caliber,
By Stratiotes Doxha Theon "2 Thes 2:15" (Richmond, Missouri) - See all my reviews (TOP 1000 REVIEWER) (VINE VOICE)
This review is from: Classical Apologetics (Paperback)
Despite my immense respect and love for the teachings of each of these authors, this work is their least impressive bit of scholarship. They seem to fall to their own presuppositions (pun intended) in making a paper tiger of the views they wish to counter. They provide a slanted version of the views they oppose then commence to tear it down. It seems doubtful to me that these gentlemen are intentionally taking this direction and so we are left to believe that they truly do not understand the views they are attempting to discredit. Perhaps it is the immense respect that Dr. Sproul has for his mentor, Dr. Gerstner, that leads him down this path - and his loyalty could even be commended. Dr. Gerstner is more difficult to explain since I find it unfathomable that he could resort to intellectual dishonesty in order to play the role of contrarian. His belief in the superiority of the classical approach is without doubt. His understanding seems to view the presuppositional and classical approaches as mutually exclusive creating a false dichotomy in which he is forced to defend one against the encroachment of the other. How he came to the belief in this dichotomy is never explained or expounded upon and that makes one wonder if he explored the topic in enough depth before making judgements. Again, however, I feel unequipped and hesitant to state what seems obvious to me in light of the intellect and depth of these teachers. It sends me away thinking I must be mistaken but there seems no way around what I sense from this work.
13 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This is the magnum opus of apologetics!,
By Kristian Lavrentidis (walt_stockholm@hotmail.com) (Stockholm, Sweden) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Classical Apologetics (Paperback)
This is without a doubt the foremost book on classical apologetics, and the first attempt ever to give a comprehensive critique of presuppositionalism. It summarizes both natural apologetics (the theistic arguments) and supernatural apologetics (the historical evidence for Scripture). Van Til is the main focus of the criticism, but other presuppositional writers like Clark, Dooyeweerd, Frame, and Knudsen are included. There is also a key chapter giving great detail to the evidence that Augustine, Luther, and Calvin were all evidentialists, despite popular charges that that they were not. This book is a must for anyone trying to understand apologetics and the issue involved between the two vastly different types of apologetics!
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|