3 Reviews
|
5 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
4 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
3 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
2 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
1 star:
|
|
(1) |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review
4.0 out of 5 stars
R-rated early 20th Century Nudes
This book has a lot of pictures and the printing is good. In some cases, the quality of the original photograph limits the quality of the reproduced print. For people who are familiar with Eakins, Muybridge, Von Gloeden, and other famous early photographers of male nudes, these images are arranged well and properly lit. The content is R-rated, so if you prefer...
Published on January 5, 2009 by D. Alexander
|
 |
1.0 out of 5 stars
Nude beauty - a book for artists and medical doctors
The german magazines in which these photos were published at the beginning of the 20th century are interesting in their obscurity; pictures from an other world - even if the images themselves had little artistic quality. This book lacks this charm and unfortunately does not compensate for this: the printing is poor and there is no text about the context in which...
Published 3 months ago by Igal van der Lijn
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
1.0 out of 5 stars
Nude beauty - a book for artists and medical doctors, November 25, 2011
This review is from: Classical Male Nudes: 1900 - 1920 (Hardcover)
The german magazines in which these photos were published at the beginning of the 20th century are interesting in their obscurity; pictures from an other world - even if the images themselves had little artistic quality. This book lacks this charm and unfortunately does not compensate for this: the printing is poor and there is no text about the context in which these photos were published.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
R-rated early 20th Century Nudes, January 5, 2009
This review is from: Classical Male Nudes: 1900 - 1920 (Hardcover)
This book has a lot of pictures and the printing is good. In some cases, the quality of the original photograph limits the quality of the reproduced print. For people who are familiar with Eakins, Muybridge, Von Gloeden, and other famous early photographers of male nudes, these images are arranged well and properly lit. The content is R-rated, so if you prefer your statues without fig leaves, this book is disappointing. For people who want suggestive vintage erotica, the images are titillating, but the title implies more prurience. A better title might be "Classical Male Buttocks and Thighs: 1900-1920."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
My girlfriend said she loved it........, July 20, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: Classical Male Nudes: 1900 - 1920 (Hardcover)
I gave this to my girlfriend as a gag gift for her birthday and she said that she loved it..........I really wouldn't know....but anyway.......anyone who buys it, enjoy it like she did......
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
|