The Climategate scandal covered from beginning to end--from 'Hide the Decline' to the current day. Written by two authors who were on the scene--Steven Mosher and Tom Fuller--Climategate takes you behind that scene and shows what happened and why. For those who have heard that the emails were taken out of context--we provide that context and show it is worse when context is provided. For those who have heard that this is a tempest in a teacup--we show why it will swamp the conventional wisdom on climate change. And for those who have heard that this scandal is just 'boys being boys'--well, boy. It's as seamy as what happened on Wall Street.
Climategate: The CRUtape Letters
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Steven M Mosher, born in Grand Rapids Michigan, graduated Northwestern University and attended UCLA for graduate studies in literature. He later joined Northrop Aircraft where he worked as an threat analyst and director of analysis until transitioning to the commercial world in 1995 when he joined Creative Labs as a director of marketing and product development. Since 1995 he has specialized in the development of new consumer technologies such as 3D graphics, web cameras, Mp3 players and a variety of wireless devices. Since 2007 he has worked in the open source community and has been active leader in the effort to get open access to the data and code underlying climate science. Thomas Fuller was born in Denver Colorado and currently lives in San Francisco. Trained by the U.S. Navy in electronics and cryptography, he has been writing about technology ever since, usually market research reports with exciting titles like 'Project Global Market for Infusion Pumps 2009-2014.' This is a lot of fun by comparison.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
144 of 164 people found the following review helpful
By P. Folkens
Format:Paperback
Mosher and Fuller were at the forefront of the revelation that Hadley's CRU was acting out of line. They were careful about moving ahead unless or until the leaked emails were deemed authentic. The reader can trust this volume. What many anthropogenic global warming advocates do not know is that workers at the CRU were concerned about the strength of data that showed the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was much warmer than the 20th Century. The leaked emails reveal this concern and how some ethically challenged scientists endeavored since the mid-1990s to diminish the importance of the MWP and devise support for the erroneous notion the the 20th Century was the warmest period of the past millennium. This book by Mosher and Fuller honestly chronicles that revelation. This book is a step -- albeit an important one -- in the citizen's quest to understand the empirical truth about anthropological global warming. Everyone who desires to have a thorough understanding of the issue must read this book and recognize the importance of the leaked CRUtape letters.
109 of 134 people found the following review helpful
By Jim W Oregon
Format:Paperback
This book details the history of respected (up to now) climate scientists here and abroad (mostly UK) who colluded and connived to create inaccurate reports, conceal their fraud, malign their critics and prevent them from publishing in journals that they influenced, lie about their raw data, lose their raw data, deny peremptorily requests for data, delay and then refuse to respond to Freedom of Information requests, promise to destroy files rather than release them to FOIA requesters, and attempt to call for criminal prosecution of those who procured correspondences and data that confirmed all this. Their highly unscientific behavior - normal enough I suppose in other fields of endeavor - does not define them or their work, but it is repetitive, and frequent enough and deliberative enough to call the rest of their work into question. Students have been expelled for less.
The closest analogy would be the Pentagon Papers, for which Daniel Ellsberg received praise rather than vilification. But the Vietnam War was not an object of adoration as is our self-flagellating anthropogenic global warming.
The closest analogy would be the Pentagon Papers, for which Daniel Ellsberg received praise rather than vilification. But the Vietnam War was not an object of adoration as is our self-flagellating anthropogenic global warming.
61 of 74 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
This is quite the thriller, with a fascinating documentation of how scientists can be gradually corrupted by the heady power of convincing the UN, world leaders, and (to a slightly lesser extent) the people of the world that we are headed for disastrous climate change and must undertake supreme efforts within the next decade or condemn our grandchildren to famine, flood, and hurricanes. Mosher was near the heart of the early confused reception of the Climategate emails, when the leaker (Mosher presents strong reasons for it being a leaker, not a hacker)attempted time and again to get his message out (even, ironically, including sending the link to the main blog for the defenders of the status quo) and no one paid any attention. The leaker sent one message ("And then a miracle occurred") with a link to the documents and no one clicked the link! Finally Mosher and others began cautiously reading, wondering if this was a hoax, calling persons whose emails they were reading to see if they were authentic, and gradually realizing that this was the break of a lifetime, akin to the release of the Pentagon Papers. The book is valuable just for bringing the readers in to the middle of this white-hot period.
The remainder of the book is a fairly complete chronological history of the emails with a reasonable effort at explaining the backstory for the general reader. It was of course thrown together in a very short time and shows it. (So I give it only 4 stars). The co-authors describe themselves as "Lukewarmers", neither alarmists not denialists, accepting that global warming is occurring but not convinced it is mostly caused by man and not convinced that superhuman efforts are all that can save the planet. The larger story here is an almost Shakespearean tragedy as the scientists at the heart of the story become more and more desperate to keep the millions of dollars in research funds coming despite the awareness that their models are not working. No doubt this will take years to be sorted out, as the most prestigious science journals of our time gradually come to realize they fell into a scientific consensus built on sand.
As an astrophysicist, I learned long ago of the Milankevitch cycle, which has led to about 7 Ice Ages lasting about 100,000 years each in the last million years, and which it seems will inevitably lead to another one down the road. Do we think we can change the precession of the poles (Vega will be the North Star in 13,000 years), the wobble of the angle of the North Pole, or the variation of the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit? If we can't, there's some serious global cooling ahead.
The remainder of the book is a fairly complete chronological history of the emails with a reasonable effort at explaining the backstory for the general reader. It was of course thrown together in a very short time and shows it. (So I give it only 4 stars). The co-authors describe themselves as "Lukewarmers", neither alarmists not denialists, accepting that global warming is occurring but not convinced it is mostly caused by man and not convinced that superhuman efforts are all that can save the planet. The larger story here is an almost Shakespearean tragedy as the scientists at the heart of the story become more and more desperate to keep the millions of dollars in research funds coming despite the awareness that their models are not working. No doubt this will take years to be sorted out, as the most prestigious science journals of our time gradually come to realize they fell into a scientific consensus built on sand.
As an astrophysicist, I learned long ago of the Milankevitch cycle, which has led to about 7 Ice Ages lasting about 100,000 years each in the last million years, and which it seems will inevitably lead to another one down the road. Do we think we can change the precession of the poles (Vega will be the North Star in 13,000 years), the wobble of the angle of the North Pole, or the variation of the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit? If we can't, there's some serious global cooling ahead.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
AGW is not the Worlds Biggest Problem!
Great Book with the author like me concerned at the alarmist attitudes to AGW which is causing massive problems in countries that cant afford it
Published 4 months ago by RS
5.0 out of 5 stars
expose at it's best
This is not an easy book to read, but stick with it. It clearly documents the trail(s) of attempted coverups by the authors and peer reviewers of the 1991 IPCC report that started... Read more
Published 17 months ago by John R. Beaman Jr.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent context for a complicated situation
This is an outstanding book that gives great background information on the major players in the great anthropogenic global warming debate, and the history of "climate science. Read more
Published 22 months ago by A. Miller
4.0 out of 5 stars
Rough, But Good Review of Climategate
By Steve Goreham, author of Climatism! Science, Common Sense, and the 21st Century's Hottest Topic.
Climategate: The Crutape Letters is a good review of the emails... Read more
Climategate: The Crutape Letters is a good review of the emails... Read more
Published on January 17, 2011 by Steve Goreham
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good required text for Professional Ethics Training
At my own university, all graduate research assistants are required to undergo a two-day course in professional ethics training. Read more
Published on December 25, 2010 by Brian H. Fiedler
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Case Study of Moral Corruption
This book is an excellent case study of moral corruption. It is about a relatively small cabal of scientists, linked to the IPCC, that brought the scientific community into... Read more
Published on December 6, 2010 by Mr. Peter M. Sullivan Aca
5.0 out of 5 stars
Did not read the book-Read the emails myself
As the title to my post here says, I have not read this book yet, but will after having stumbled upon it. Read more
Published on November 18, 2010 by Joanna
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fair-minded, involving and enjoyable
A fair-minded account. The final judgements are clear. Wise lessons are drawn. This is not a partisan book. Read more
Published on June 7, 2010 by Mr. Allan P. Gay
4.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent Review of a Major Scandal
Authors Mosher and Fuller are NOT skeptics, and believe that there is some warming going on, and we need to address it, so their review is really independent of the skeptics who... Read more
Published on May 21, 2010 by Kevin L. Thomas
5.0 out of 5 stars
Global Warming, Then Climate Change, Then...?
I believe this book deserves 5 stars.
Why does the "father" of the Global Warming Movement (Al Gore) continue to, fly in private jets, have his fanny shuffled around in... Read more
Why does the "father" of the Global Warming Movement (Al Gore) continue to, fly in private jets, have his fanny shuffled around in... Read more
Published on May 19, 2010 by H.B.
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Listmania!
So You'd Like to...
|
|
