From Publishers Weekly
Those already inclined to regard the government as deceitful, oppressive and imperialist will be further convinced by this book. To most people, however, it will appear unfortunately slanted and dated. The overt purpose of the collection is to assemble writings by American scholars on how the Cold War affected the academy, but as often as not the real agenda would seem the condemnation of almost all government action of the period. Montgomery strikes this note in his introduction, which he begins with censorship of broadcasts by Los Alamos scientists being censored in May 1946. There are plenty of interesting essays to be written about the purported topic without dragging tangential subjects in kicking and screaming: corporate power versus the UAW and CIO, racial violence in the military and genocide against the Indians-"the original sin of American culture," says Noam Chomsky. In more germane (if equally skewed) essays, R.C. Lewontin describes how research agendas of universities were shaped by communist witch hunts while Richard Ohmann writes of secret inducements in English departments to follow a Cold War blueprint. In short, the scholarship is embarrassingly selective, and designed not to inform but to indict.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
New Press editor Andre Schiffrin, who has suggested topics for many of Studs Terkel's lively oral histories, expected more traditional history and less "oral" recollection when he imagined collecting studies of the cold war's impact on U.S. intellectual life, particularly at U.S. universities, but once past the McCarthy era, he found little useful work done. After sponsoring university discussions, the publisher plans a series of essay collections on aspects of this important subject. The series' first entry is a mix of documentary investigations and personal memoirs. Most authors examine the cold war's effects within specific disciplines: Howard Zinn on history; Richard Ohmann on English literature; Laura Nader on anthropology; Ray Siever on earth science; Immanuel Wallerstein on area studies; and Ira Katznelson on political science. Noam Chomsky and R. C. Lewontin provide more general comments on academia's response to cold war growth, funding, and challenges to traditional principles. Not an essential acquisition, but likely to circulate to readers drawn by the subject or the volume's contributors.
Mary Carroll