| |||||||||||||||
Who, he asks, refuses the consolation of correct forms better than Edward Lear, or the consensus of taste better than Gregory Corso and Stewart Home?
From Lear to Charles Willeford, Olson discovers in comic writers a philosophy of oddness and paradox that parallels and extends the work of the major postmodern thinkers.
"An original, splendidly researched, and necessary book. By pointing to the vast, excluded literature of 'comic writers,' Dr. Olson opens the door to a postmodern scholarship capable of greater flexibility. Comedy after Postmodernism evinces a lucid, passionate, and engaging style." -- Andrei Codrescu (from the back cover)
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting even for professional comedians,
By bob wilson (Seattle, WA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Comedy after Postmodernism: Rereading Comedy from Edward Lear to Charles Willeford (Hardcover)
I got this book out of my library to see if I could get some ideas about what postmodernism might mean to a professional stnad-up comic. The book is itself very funny in places. He accuses the professional philosophers Jacques Derrida and Jaques Lacan of having been Maoist, and claims that Gilles Deleuze and Jean-Francois Lyotard were not. I remember those people from a critical theory class I took from this professor ten years ago when he was saying the same thing.Olson is always sort of idiosyncratic. He wore a cowboy hat and a paisley shirt to classes. His boots were pink. The book he has written here is also idiosyncratic. He mixes weird stuff: like Hegel and Wodehouse in one chapter, and ancient Greek philosophy and modern mystery stories in another chapter. It was fun to see him go in depth. The basis for humor, as he once pointed out in a class, was that you take two conflicting schemas, two completely opposite ideas, and have them make love. Their boundaries tickle. It's like omparing motorcycles and oranges. There is always a way to do it. Goosebumps, they both roll, they both smell good, and so on, until you get a productive comparison that makes you laugh. Olson keeps working until he gets it. Olson is doing that through this whole book. It's a hard thing to sustain because it can get so complex that it falls into apostasy. But that's where comedians should be headed. This is sit-down comedy, though. Sit down, and think about it. I should maybe try to ompare apples and speedboats.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|