| ||||||||||||||||||
|
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
In the fall of 1515 a professor began to teach the book of Romans to his university students. As he painstakingly prepared his lectures, he gradually realized, and then embraced, the book’s central theme—salvation is by grace alone through faith alone. That spark of truth ignited Martin Luther’s own spiritual life and the fires of reformation that would follow.
Luther’s Commentary on Romans presents the very earliest developments of Luther’s evangelical theology, which he described as “the theology of the Cross.” This popular edition, translated by Theodore Mueller, organizes Luther’s notes for modern readers, using explanatory subheadings and parenthetical comments to clarify the great Reformer’s thoughts. Some views, which Luther later modified or discarded, have been omitted in order to avoid confusion with his later works. The result is a text that is concise, practical, and devotional.
Martin Luther (1483–1546) left his comfortable upbringing to become a Roman Catholic monk and later a professor of theology at the University of Wittenberg in Saxony. His study and teaching of the Greek text of the New Testament represent the beginnings of modern textual study, and his widely disseminated writings sparked the Protestant Reformation in Europe. Other works by Luther include Commentary on Galatians and Commentary on First and Second Peter and Jude.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
Beyond that, it's difficult to know exactly how to rate Luther's writing itself. Being from the Reformed tradition rather than the Lutheran, I would obviously take issue with Luther on some minor points, and perhaps suggest Calvin's or Murray's commentary instead. Luther does have the rather annoying habit of arguing against works and reason in extremely strong terms and then later coming back to explain that he is not rejecting works but only the reliance upon them or reason, but only the wrong use of it. This is understandable in the context of the original writing, but a more careful use of terms that avoids the problem entirely would have been preferable.
The book has considerable historical merit. Most of the content comes directly from his lectures in the second decade of the 16th century and was not significantly revised when it was published later. The preface on the other hand, written in 1557 gives a clearer indication of Luther's mature theology and is frequently quoted in works about Luther. If you are looking for essential Luther, Bondage of the Will or his Commentary on Galatians would be a better fit for that purpose.
Finally, we must note that the book is what I call a pastoral commentary. That is, the interest of the author is primarily in assisting the reader in applying God's Word in his or her life. As such, it devotes no time to questions of the date and circumstance of Romans, and very little to matters of translation or text criticism. If you are looking for what I would call a "scholarly" commentary to assist you in preparing lessons, sermons, or what not, this is not what you are after.
If it weren't for the awful italic insertions, I probably would have given it a 4.
Luther's exposition of Romans gave rise to one of the rallying cries of the Reformation, sola fide, 'justification by faith alone!' While this doctrine is truly central to the book of Romans, and while its 'discovery' was tantamount to the reformation of the church; it seems as though, for Luther, the gospel can be simplified down to this singular doctrine. While without question a fundamental of Paul's thought, sola fide does not exhaust the gospel he preaches, nor is it even the pre-eminent element of his gospel. While Luther touches on the redemptive-historical moment at key junctures in the book, he seems to run back to what for himself was so liberating. And that has led to a brand of subjectivism which threatens to obscure the objective foundation of the doctrine of justification itself. Because of his piety Luther himself does a decent job of avoiding that pitfall, but he leaves the pit uncovered so that his readers are susceptible to that danger.
Enjoy Luther's Romans. Appreciate it for its original magnitude and historical impact. It's a classic. Embrace the doctrine of justification by faith. But take care to read it with some perspective.
|