Customer Reviews


8 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (4)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


4.0 out of 5 stars I would recommend this.
This is a good beginners dictionary. Its not too big that I can carry it with me while out and about, but not too small either (it won't fit in your pocket/normal size purse). The only down side is that the korean part is filed under romanization instead of hangul. It does have the hangul printed next to it, but I have found that the romanization can throw people off the...
Published 12 months ago by jujubee

versus
30 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Romanized hangeul: YUCK! Short entries without examples.
In the process of learning seven languages I've used many dictionaries and this is the worst I've ever seen. This is a real shame because it's the only Korean-English dictionary I've seen directed towards a native English speaker learning Korean. Those directed towards Koreans completely ignore issues a native English speaker might have. The completely romanized...
Published on May 20, 1998


Most Helpful First | Newest First

30 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Romanized hangeul: YUCK! Short entries without examples., May 20, 1998
By A Customer
This review is from: NTC's Compact Korean and English Dictionary (NTC Language Dictionaries) (Hardcover)
In the process of learning seven languages I've used many dictionaries and this is the worst I've ever seen. This is a real shame because it's the only Korean-English dictionary I've seen directed towards a native English speaker learning Korean. Those directed towards Koreans completely ignore issues a native English speaker might have. The completely romanized format is very frustrating. It's fine for English to Korean, but useless if you want to look up a Korean word. Most students of Korean learn hangeul within the first week of a Korean language course, so learning romanization is just an annoying step backwards. And for those who haven't learned the very simple hangeul, why force them to learn how to romanize a Korean word they might see on a sign or in a menu when that energy would be better spent learning how to look the word up directly in hangeul. The entries themselves are so short, so devoid of examples and consideration of idiomatic meanings to be almost useless. I know this is meant to be a very basic dictionary, but it has been stripped too far. Context must be taken into particular consideration with the Korean language, because of its notoriously case specific nature.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Too expensive and ineffective, January 19, 2000
English-Korean is all right, but the Korean-English section is terribly confusing. Since the dictionary uses hangul, why are the Korean words alphabetized according to the romanizations? For a beginning Korean student, learning the hangul alphabetical order is challenge enough. Add a seemingly erratic romanization (there is no one standard system of writing Korean words in Roman letters), and you have a very confused student! For this much money, find a dictionary that is strictly hangul without confusing romanizations.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Romanizing Korean is a bad habit, March 22, 2003
By 
Robertson Thomas (Hapcheon, Gyeongnam, South Korea) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: NTC's Compact Korean and English Dictionary (NTC Language Dictionaries) (Hardcover)
I second Minerva Rheault's motion: Romanizing Korean is not a good idea. However, my objection is somewhat different--any serious student of the Korean language will eventually look up items which are not in this dictionary. The sooner that student learns the Korean alphabet, the better.

Would you serve a drink to an alcoholic?
If not, then don't serve Romanization to a student of the Korean language.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Obsolete Words, April 12, 2006
This dicitonary is OK. When my Korean teacher (I am an expat living in Seoul, so I trust that she knows Korean backwards & forwards)checks my homework, often she says, "no one uses that word any more." It is also common to not find words that I need in this dictionary.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars I would recommend this., January 30, 2011
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This is a good beginners dictionary. Its not too big that I can carry it with me while out and about, but not too small either (it won't fit in your pocket/normal size purse). The only down side is that the korean part is filed under romanization instead of hangul. It does have the hangul printed next to it, but I have found that the romanization can throw people off the correct pronunciation.

The book was in very good condition, looked brand new like it never been opened. Got here in a reasonable time too (ordered it around Christmas).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars A very complete Korean-English-Korean dictionary., July 27, 1998
By A Customer
I found the text to really hold up to high standards as far as having fairly clear translations, also all words are written in the Korean character set as well as the translated phonetic form. It also includes a nice summary of the transcription system to make learning easier.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars In defense of the romanization, May 24, 2008
By 
Walt Whitman Fan (Buffalo, New York United States) - See all my reviews
Several reviews here assume too much about what new students of Korean need to know. There is nothing wrong with the romanization since the hangul is right next to it. (Characters added might have been helpful as well.) Hangul is not phonetic. The romanization helps students who are outside a 'Korean is spoken here' area avoid serious errors. There are lots of pronunciation patterns that are made easier by the romanization.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars This book is great for people who want to learn Korean, June 23, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: NTC's Compact Korean and English Dictionary (NTC Language Dictionaries) (Hardcover)
I received this book the other day and in my opinion it was everything I hoped it would be. It suprised me because unlike other books it supplied with approximately 20,000 common words both in Korean and English reference. Those of you who are learning Korean or English would find this a great help.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

NTC's Compact Korean and English Dictionary (NTC Language Dictionaries)
Used & New from: $1.88
Add to wishlist See buying options