3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Boy! This SHOULD have been better!, December 8, 1999
By A Customer
COMPLETELY MAD is a fairly thorough, albeit superficial, treatment of the MAD phenomenon. A biased perspective leaves much unsaid. Too much a valentine to Gaines and company. I would have enjoyed more material from the MAD comic book. Much of the information about the "usual gang of idiots" is extremely sketchy, bland and/or uninteresting, meaning that Ms. Reidelbach did not go very far beyond MAD's offices for information; i.e., a superficial and pretty lousy job of research. There was so much opportunity here!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
must-read for fans of mad, October 8, 1998
This review is from: Completely Mad: A History of the Comic Book and Magazine (Hardcover)
This book is a must-read for fans of the magazine or comic books in general. It has lots of samples from older issues, pictures of every cover, and a complete history of not only Mad, but the factors that influenced it, and the early days of comic books. The chapter on the history of Alfred E. Neuman is excellent.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3.0 out of 5 stars
A lot wasn't told, January 21, 2012
I have every issue of MAD ever published, and I can truthfully say that MAD has not been what it was since Warner's took it over in the early 70s. Remember the magazine satires like Neurotic magazine, Phony magazine, and Racketeer Illustrated magazine, or the ones of real magazines like Field & Scream, TV Guise, and Reader's Digress, or the newspaper satires like the Daily Square or the Daily Monopoly? I don't think MAD has run even one since Warner's took over. In fact, I don't think they've run anything satirizing the publishing industry either since. In fact, I knew for certain that Bill Gaines wasn't really running the show when back in the eighties they published their first "tie-in" satire, Grimlins, of a Warner movie which had just been released about a week earlier.
There's a lot this book doesn't tell. In fact, it basically "glosses over" what happened to Don Martin. You hear one story, that Bill Gaines refused to give him the copyrights on the items he had done for them over the years. This story doesn't make sense because there was no possible way he could have, because he didn't own them, and hadn't since he first sold the magazine in 1965. Warner's owns them, and it seems I remember reading somewhere that it is very difficult to get permission to use anything they own the copyright on. These are only a few examples; I could name others.
Years ago, there was a book called Decline and Fall, which told the story of the last years of the Saturday Evening Post. Maybe someday someone will publish such a book about what has really gone on behind the scenes at MAD since Warner's took over. Unfortunately, it will probably never happen because those who could tell the story (who are still alive), I've got a feeling are afraid of retributions if they do.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No