by Thomas Sowell
|
A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before by Cass R. Sunstein |
by Steven Michael Teles
|
So Much Reform, So Little Change: The Persistence of Failure in Urban Schools by Charles M. Payne |
New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR's Economic Legacy Has Damaged America by Burton W. Folsom |
Just eight years later the U.S. Supreme Court began reversing these initiatives, signifying a major retreat from Brown v. Board of Education. In Kansas City, African American families opposed to the district court's efforts organized a takeover of the school board and requested that the court case be closed. Joshua Dunn argues that Judge Clark's ruling was not the result of tyrannical "judicial activism" but was rather the logical outcome of previous contradictory Supreme Court doctrines. High Court decisions, Dunn explains, necessarily limit the policy choices available to lower court judges, introducing complications the Supreme Court would not anticipate. He demonstrates that the Kansas City case is a model lesson for the types of problems that develop for lower courts in any area in which the Supreme Court attempts to create significant change. Dunn's exploration of this landmark case deepens our understanding of when courts can and cannot successfully create and manage public policy.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
There are no customer reviews yet.
|
|||
|
Video reviews
|
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
|
After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. |