15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Dispassionate Exploration of Columbine, August 21, 2009
This review is from: Comprehending Columbine (Paperback)
I was led to this book after reading Columbine by Dave Cullen. For me, that book raised more questions then it answered. Ironically, I live in the community and had resisted reading any of the books on the subject. Locally, the coverage of the murders was relentless and I had read and seen enough to last a lifetime. I thought I never wanted to hear about it again. Then I saw the press release for Cullen's book and decided that after ten years perhaps it was time to read a comprehensive exploration of the subject.
I found Cullen's book a great disappointment. There are so many factual errors and assumptions throughout the work that at the end I felt I had to do more reading. I checked my library's catalog to find other relevant material on Columbine which is how I found this book, along with Jeff Kass' book and Brooks Brown's memoir. So, I started out reluctant to read even one book on the subject and in the end read four.
Brooks Brown's book is a heartfelt book by a boy trying to sort out unfathomable events caused by people he knew. It is worthy of a read, but it is not, nor does it claim to be, a thorough exploration like Cullen's, Kass' or Larkin's work. Of the group I feel Larkin's book is the most objective. It has a clear academic perspective in its execution but unlike a dry thesis it reads well. The logic isn't faulty and the evidence for statements and conclusions is provided. There is little opinion offered without substantiation. I read the book from cover to cover.
Unlike the other two author's, Larkin does not have an obvious agenda -- except to find answers. Kass' book focuses too long on the racial aspect of one child's murder which is a worthy subject but throws the balance of the book off in its length. It becomes distracting. Cullen's book offers blatant errors about the killers' -- Dylan and Klebold were not popular or ladies men (read Brooks Brown's book -- he was a friend.) Worse, Cullen is intent on simplifying the story -- he claims it was all the fault of mental illness. Well, there are plenty of mentally ill people who do not commit crimes, just as there are plenty of kids who are bullied that do not murder. Many more factors are clearly at play in the "why" of what happened.
Readng Brooks Brown's book makes the trauma of on-going bullying and the outcast status in school clear.Some kids are going to handle the erosion of their self-esteem better than others. Cullen's determination that it wasn't a factor is a bizarre assertion. One of the other reviewers here mentioned that the bullying theory had been largely debunked -- huh? Where did that come from -- the school administration? All the pieces of the puzzle must be examined to get a complete picture of what caused those two boys to commit such a horrific act -- it is the only way to learn from Columbine and it is what Larkin does in his book. The adults in the lives of the children failed them. It wasn't one thing or one event that caused this act. This crime was planned and kept secret for a year -- a staggering fact.
My hope in reading Cullen's book was that a complete story would be told, not one that was whitewashed by the school (what bullying?), hidden by the sheriff's department (what gross mishandling?) or hijacked by the evanjelicals (it was religious persecution.) Unfortunately the author twisted information to make the story reach a pre-determined conclusion of his own making. That is not the case with Larkin in this book.
If you are looking for one book to read on the subject I would recommend this one. If you have time for two I'd read this one and Jeff Kass' book. If you have time for three, definitely add Brooks Brown's book to your list.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Thorough book but has some issues, June 1, 2009
This review is from: Comprehending Columbine (Paperback)
This book is very thorough and written in a scholarly manner. However, the author seems to want to support the bully hypothesis so badly that he insists on claims which are unsupported. The claim that bothered me the most was that Klebold was bisexual. The only evidence the author provides for this is that a reporter came forward after the shooting and said he encountered Klebold in a chat room, where he identified himself as bisexual. Besides this book, I have never read this anywhere else, and the claim seems unreliable to me. Also the author insists that the Klebolds are a dysfunctional family because Dylan and his brother argue; the parents have different religious beliefs; and they are not very touchy. The Klebolds do not seem any more dysfunctional than any other family. Most siblings fight; a home where religion is a choice seems healthy; and affection comes in many different forms. I don't agree with some of the claims in the book but if you're curious about it, I would suggest getting a used copy and making your own judgments. Best Wishes -A. K.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Decent Book, September 16, 2007
This review is from: Comprehending Columbine (Paperback)
Just finnished the Book, was suprised it tended to lean back towards the whole "Jockocracy" thing. I thought those theories had pretty much been abandoned in favor of the "Apocolyiptic fame" theories that the boys were trying to eclipse Tim McViegh and the fact that they didn't select any specific targets. I liked the fact that it was so harsh on the "Christian right" for trying to make the massacre about themselves and enjoyed the interviews with the random students. Was supprised that every student interviewed said the same thing "They shot the wrong students". REALLY enjoyed the 8th chapter about the rise & fall of youth culture, I'm really into history, but the last chapter of the book is wasted ink with Larkin's theories on preventing school Bullying. It's always going to happen.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No