Most Helpful Customer Reviews
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
This book is a failure, February 17, 2002
This review is from: Computer Systems Organization and Architecture (Paperback)
I was forced to buy this book for my Architecture class. I really regret wasting my money on it. In short, the book [stinks]. It assumes too many things. It does not do a very good job explaining some important pieces of information. For the most part, the student will spend the whole time trying to make sense out of what the author is saying. It is one of these "should've..could've" books! If you are looking for an architecture book, I wouldn't recommend this one.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Understandable but complex - for a complex subject, May 24, 2005
This review is from: Computer Systems Organization and Architecture (Paperback)
I used this book for an undergrad Architecture course. I had a great teacher, and we only looked at certain sections in the book. There is an awful lot to cover in a single semester.
The book is written for students with very little formal electronics knowledge, but you do need to know some basic logic and hardware concepts. It is based on the i86 architecture, making generalizations where possible. If you have a strong background, or want to learn very detailed concepts - then there are better choices. Sometimes this book over-simplifies concepts to reach its intended audience.
I later found the book useful as a reference tool in a graduate architecture class. Especially the sections on memory - cache, virutal, pagefiles, etc.. Even though my grad class was on the MiPS architecture, the concepts are the same.
Overall, this was a decent text for an undergraduate course.
As other reviewers, (good and bad) have noted - when you are learning, you should always use additional references. Don't depend on this book alone to teach you.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Plan to spend a lot of time looking at other references., November 5, 2003
By A Customer
This review is from: Computer Systems Organization and Architecture (Paperback)
a = b, c, and d. e = f, g, and h. b > e while a < f. ac < gh while fh < bd. c can be diagrammed in this box if you use h. g is shown in this truth table if you use a. Part of what makes this text so difficult to understand is the author's inability to use consistent terms while trying to explain material. In the first chapter, a simple And gate is referred to as 'AND', 'x^y', 'x.y', 'xy', '()()', and 'and'. All true, but used interchangeably while trying to explain makes the concepts incredibly difficult to decipher, particularly when variations for representing other boolean concepts are added to the fray. The best part of the book, as far as I can tell, is that the key terms are in bold so I know what to plug into Google to try and figure out what it is.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|