Customer Reviews

Conan Chronicles I

5 star:		(10)
4 star:		(7)
3 star:		(11)
2 star:		(3)
1 star:		(8)

 

 

Know, o price, that between the years when the pulps ruled the newsstands, and the death of Karl Edward Wagner, there was an age undreamed of, when Conan the Barbarian finally became a household name. Hither came Robert Jordan...

I remember reading these books 20 years ago, when I would literally read anything as long as it had Conan on the cover. I quickly realized though, THAT THEY'RE ALL THE SAME. Even the L. Sprague De Camp pastiches managed to deviate from the stock formula from time to time. In every book in this collection, Conan is up against another diabolical wizard bent on destroying the world.

Its really simple, folks, if you want to read Sherlock Holmes, you read Arthur Conan Doyle. If you want to read Tarzan, you read Edgar Rice Burroughs, and if you want to read Conan, you read Robert E. Howard. None of these Robert Jordan books ever approach the tragic romance of "Queen of the Black Coast", or the bleak nihlism of "Beyond the Black River". None of Jordan's villians even come close to The Black Seers of Yimshah, or Khosatral Khel. None of Jordan's love interests can hold a candle to Valeria of the Red Brotherhood, or Belit.

If you've read all of the Howard stories (finally re-released in a 3 series from ACE, btw), and you simply must have more, then I would suggest "The Road of Kings" by Karl Edward Wagner, who also wrote the magnificent "Kane" series.

As for Robert Jordan, his Conan stories are the literary equivalent to the movie "Conan the Destroyer (which he novelized, btw)", or the old marvel comics. You might find them enjoyable if you're 15 or younger, but as you get older (like me) you'll start to appreciate the originals more, and you'll dismiss these for what they are, literary fast food.

I picked up this book as a fan of Jordan's Wheel of Time, and the Schwarzenegger Conan movies. I figure put the two together and we're in business. Well... The three stories in this book have pretty much nothing to do with one another other than being vaguely chronological, and sharing one or two supporting characters. They were entertaining, but involved no development for our hero at all. It was like Jordan merely borrowed Conan and then put him back the way he found him. Unchanged- for better or worse. Much like a Bond movie. Not exactly my taste, but if that is fine with you- give it a shot!

In CONAN the INVINCIBLE, the barbarian/thief is hired by a nasty ol' wizard to steal five precious gems from a King's throne room only to find that someone has beaten him to it. Conan is apparently never fazed by anything, and of course pursues the rival thieves. He will stop at nothing to get his reward. This brings him face to face with several perils including an army of the King's men, the mysterious Red Hawk and her band of caravan-raiding bandits, as well as another evil wizard and his army of Lizard men. I give it a 3.

In CONAN the DEFENDER, our hero arrives in the city of Belverus to, again, find work to fill his gold purse. His plan is to raise his own company of warriors, but Civil war threatens the Kingdom- and he must choose sides between his friends and the King. But first he must find out who has been trying to kill him and why. I give this a 3 also.

In CONAN the UNCONQUERED, the barbarian once again arrives in a new city looking for a way to fill his pockets with gold and manages to end up knee deep in trouble. As usual, he does some bar crawling, sleeps with some gorgeous women, and of course- stops the evil wizard. This story was not as good as the other two in my opinion, but it was ok. I give it a 2.

Over all I gave this book a 3 because the three stories were almost exact replicas of one another. By the end, I was bored and had heard it all before. However, you could do worse than this book if looking for a quick read, but in general I'd only recommend it to a younger audience.

-If you are looking for more "Wheel of Time" you are likely to be disappointed -but it is fun watching Jordan hone his skills.

-As far as Conan goes, I hear R E Howard's works are the best -so you might want to look there instead. That's next for me as well.

The previous reviews I have seen of this trilogy seem to suggest that these were written post-Wheel of Time. This is definitely not the case. I have been a Conan Fan since the mid-seventies and, over the years, have read the books of many authors who used my favorite hero unkindly. Jordan, however, treated Conan with such skill that REH himself would have been proud. It was his ability to tell the Conan tales with such grace that made me willing to give his Wheel of Time a try when it came out. His skill at using the Hyborian world of Howard was eclipsed in his creation of his own world. I do believe his skill in the Wheel of Time series surpasses his skills in the Conan tales, but the skills were developed in the Conan tales. Jordan, like any great writer, hones his skills with time and use. This surpassing himself in his later works in no way takes away from the fact that his early works were excellent. As far as the Conan tales go, his are the best outside of Howard, L. Sprague de Camp and Lin Carter, and this is saying alot.

For those who love Conan stories, Robert Jordan has given a new depth to the Barbarian. Jordan's Conan books are the creme de la creme of the series. Those of you who love the Wheel of Time Series might be a little disappointed with these Conan Stories in comparison. But that would be comparing fast food to gourmet cuisine.

After reading 10,000 some odd pages of the wheel of time, part of me expected this to feel the same way. But these were certainly Conan stories. Each of these three stories were pretty much the same, kind of like watching three scooby doo episodes in a row: there is an evil socrerer working to enslave the world. Conan, along with another characterized warrior type, a handful of nameless fighters and a beautiful woman, get in the way of the sorcerer's plans. It's not as good as Robert E Howard, but entertaining IF thats what you're looking for (like scooby doo)

I'm sorry - I have to set a few other reviewers straight. Robert Jordan's Conan stories WAY pre-date the Wheel of Time. Also, Conan is not his character. He, like many other authors, borrowed Conan from the late Robert E Howard. Howard wrote to my mind the best Conan (he was the creator, after all) and Conan was by no means his best stuff.

This book was alright, I'm so hooked up on Jordans ability to write The Wheel of Time series... I don't think he describes his characters as well in this series. However, its still a good book to read.

While I agree with a prior reviewer (who posted 5 stars) that, while THE CONAN CHRONICLES is better than THE WHEEL OF TIME, THE CONAN CHRONICLES does not faithfully reflect nor reproduce the Howard's universe or characters. The negative reviews this book has received are indicative of the latter comparison and most likely, some comparison against all other books in the genre. Some reviewers almost seem to be implying that THE CONAN CHRONICLES is a 5-star book "for Robert Jordan," while some are saying, "this book is terrible." I'm in the latter camp; while readable, THE CONAN CHRONICLES is pulp--predictable and repetitious beach-reading not worth re-reading or even continuing to own. My copy will end up at a used-book store.

(Oh, and what IS it with Jordan and the "round breasts" bit? Jordan's women seem merely the two-dimensional product of puerile fantasy. Has he ever really KNOWN a woman? This becomes almost embarrassing after a few hundred pages.)

Robert Jordan has managed to capture the spirit of Conan perhaps better than any other author since the originator, Robert E. Howard. The intrigue, the suspense, the unimaginable made believable are all there. There is a difference, however. The bulk of Conan by Mr. Howard was written as an on-going serial. Jordan has extended Conan into full-length novels, giving him more room for exposition and plot-building. The effect is that much more affecting. Read it. It's good

My purpose of writing this is not to review Robert Jordan's Conan novel, but to bring to the attention of any who read this the unfortunate lack of the original Conan material in todays market. Conan was created by a man named Robert E. Howard in the 1930's and his original works, are in my opinion, some of the best in American literature. Unfortunatly, whoever has the publishing rights to Conan right now only publishes contemporary Conan novels which are in my opinion, second rate. My recomendation to anyone interested in reading Conan is to go to their local library and see if they have any of the 1960's publishings with the Frank Frazetta covers.
However failing in that Robert Jordan is your best bet out of the current Conan authors.