Never before has a book of this caliber (brief but thorough) been printed in English regarding the entire history of Iran. Although the writer does not claim to be a historian, he realized the need for just such a timely book. A Concise History of Iran sheds light on the heretofore unfamiliar and often unrecognized relationship between Persia and the world; it is filled with information in a historical sequence with accurate and multiple references that may be used academically. Unlike the United States, where separation of church and state is a mandated fact of the Constitution, in Iran, wise Clerics-religious Magi-have had and still have enormous political influence. These learned theologians and magistrates were respected for their religious wisdom and, therefore wisely and/or unwisely, trusted to be politically astute. While the Clerics may or may not outwardly run for the highest office, they judiciously choose who will run and, in some cases, they even appoint a succeeding ruler or influence the elections. The systems of choosing leadership in both The U.S. and Iran are vulnerable to mistakes. For example, the U.S. action in the Middle East has had some serious, unfortunate results, whatever the original intention was-for example, loss of innocent lives from West and East (the new Viet Nam in Afghanistan and Iraq) and the imminent danger of World War III.
Book Description
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Well, it is concise and it is about Iran...,
By
This review is from: A Concise History of Iran (Paperback)
The author of this book openly avows that he isn't a historian, but something tells me I would have known even if he hadn't. This book is dotted with many examples of practices that would make anyone even vaguely interested in accurate history cringe. For example, Shirazi describes the Scythians/Sakas as being "pagans who held their women in common and devoured their aged relatives" on page 85. However, he neglects to note that because the Scythians had no writing of their own, the only accounts of them we have were written by the Greeks and the Persians - i.e. their bitter enemies who probably weren't particularly interested in scholarly objectivity. He also tends to make rather large omissions, one example being the complete lack of reference to Shah Ismail's brutal campaign of forcing the public to convert from Sunnism to Shi'ism in the chapter on the Safavid Empire.
Last but not least, he has an irritating tendency to make embarrassing factual errors, a few of which I'll list: - Page 64: Referring to Cyrus the Great as Cyrus III when he was actually Cyrus II - Page 88: Reference to the assassination of Julius Caesar at the hands of Octavius and Cassius rather than Brutus and Cassius - Page 203: Calling Ahmad Pasha "the Turk Emperor," despite that he was only a military officer and later a governor and despite that the very title pasha indicates that he was a government functionary, not a sultan - Page 216: Reference to how "Thomas Jefferson along with other scholars drew up the [U.S.] Constitution" despite Jefferson's being in France at the time and thus obviously not well placed to attend a constitutional convention in Philadelphia There are other claims that seem questionable, such as the assertion on page 188 that the Ottoman sultan Selim I massacred 40,000 Shi'ites for which I have yet to find any corroborating sources. However, those I listed above were enough to make me suspect every fact this book offered. I suppose one can argue that this proves the superior instructive ability of the book (the process of running to the internet every five minutes to crosscheck a claim did ensure the subject matter was drilled into my memory), but this is hardly what constitutes an undisputed authority on the subject. Of course, the book does have one undisputable edge over other histories of Iran: it's in English (albeit rather bad English). However, if the reader wants a history that doesn't require constantly being on the alert for inaccuracies, this is not the place to look.
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Get an English-speaking proofreader!,
By
This review is from: A Concise History of Iran (Paperback)
I had this book on my Wish List, then found it through my library. I'm very glad I did not pay for it. I am not Iranian, nor is my family. I was interested in learning more about Iran's history and culture as background to some current news headlines. This book is FULL of information to be sure. But much of the "history" is simply chronology strung together, with no academic interpretation. Granted, Persia's history is extremely long and complicated, maybe the author was trying to streamline into one manageable volume. But what made the book unreadable towards the end was the grammatical and typographical errors in the text. Very simple things that for the most part do not obscure the meaning, but make the reading itself halting and mentally exhausting. How hard is it to have a native English speaker proof-read your work?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Persian Pride...,
By Mohammad Abubakr (Valcom, South Aftica) - See all my reviews
This review is from: A Concise History of Iran (Paperback)
One can argue that Mr. Shiriazi's book is not written in perfect English. One can argue that the book has made a few errors on names (e.g. Cyrys II instead of Cyrus III). One can even argue that Mr. Shirazi is not a historian by profession and hence why bother writing the book. One can always argue over so many things. But one thing is for certain, If you are an Iranian - and I mean a genuine Iranian - you will come to truly enjoy reading this book for the purity of Mr. Shirazi's Good Thoughts, Good Words and his intended Good Deeds for authoring this book.
Having been away from Iran since the national suicide of 1979, I had forgotten how it feels anymore to have the blood of Persia running inside of me. Mr. Shirazi through this book has reminded me of the pride that is within me and that I should always remember of it. This is the book that I strongly recommend for all Iranians (and especially those born after the national suicide of 1979) to read. I wished I knew how to genuinely express my gratitude to Mr. Shirazi for writing this book. I do strongly recommend for all Persians, all those who still consider themselves as having had the pride of Persia inside them whether now or at some point in the past to read this book.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
