Buy Used
$7.00
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Ex-library with typical stamps/stickers, mylar over DJ. No markings in text, binding very good.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Confessions of a Medicine Man: An Essay in Popular Philosophy (Bradford Books) Hardcover – January 22, 1999

ISBN-13: 978-0262201148 ISBN-10: 0262201143 Edition: 1st

Used
Price: $7.00
8 New from $7.93 25 Used from $0.27
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$7.93 $0.27
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Get Up to 80% Back When You Sell Us Your Books
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Bradford Books
  • Hardcover: 160 pages
  • Publisher: The MIT Press; 1 edition (January 22, 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0262201143
  • ISBN-13: 978-0262201148
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.3 x 0.6 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,528,981 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

In this collection of essays on the state of the modern health care system, Tauber, a physician and a professor of philosophy and medicine at Boston University, presents an engaging study of ethics and the medical system. Modeling his book on the Confessions of St. Augustine, Tauber presents his own confessions in a similar way: narrative personal history plus ethical and philosophical discourse. Tauber clarifies both metaphysics and the intricacies of medicine for the lay reader, and he does so with vivid, terse imagery. His narratives are poignant and amazingly real. His philosophy is well grounded in excellent scholarship, his discussions of the philosophy and history of science prove fascinating, and his conclusions are indisputable. The state of our health care system, a need for universal health care, the fractured and imperfect mechanics of health maintenance organizations, patient rights laws, economics, spirituality, interpersonal relations, and many other medical ethics issues are discussed here with alacrity. A fascinating and approachable study on a subject that touches everyone's lives. Michael Spinella

From Kirkus Reviews

An intelligent and thorough philosophical analysis of the medical care morass, this does no less than clear away superficial and superfluous arguments, leaving a few essential issues and a direction for reform. Tauber, a philosopher as well as pro fessor of medicine (Boston Univ.) briefly catalogues the well-known ills of our health care system, and provides a cohesive overview of how we arrived at this point, interwoven with experiences from his own medical practice and family life. Three basic qu estions emerge: how do we regard ourselves when ill, what do we expect from the physician, and as a result, how and what professional ideal do we wish to instill in health care providers to make medical practice more humane and compassionate? In a society that so prizes individual autonomy, Tauber makes it clear that we have to accept that being ill means immediately losing such self-sufficiency and self-direction, given todays setting of highly technical and obscure clinical science.'' If we acknowledge that the doctor-patient relationship is a fundamentally unequal one (and one with no parallel in the business world), then we can turn our attention to how best to prepare practitioners who adhere to a moral obligation to restore health (and thus autonomy ). Not only should we not look to the business world for help in structuring medical care, but Tauber also takes issue with using science as the single basis for clinical care. Distinguish between scientific and caring missions, he suggests, since laborat ory-based medicine addresses only what Tauber calls the ``materialistic'' aspects of disease (those which can be physically or chemically measured). Tauber succeeds in his effort to step back, begin again at the philosophical beginning, and cast a new lig ht on the tangle of medical care. Involved professionals and the general readership alike will benefit. -- Copyright ©1998, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on June 9, 2000
Format: Paperback
Here is a short, resonant book on a topic that concerns us all: medical ethics.
Alfred I. Tauber is a biochemist and an M.D. (medical doctor). He is also a professor of medicine and a professor of philosophy at Boston University.
Tauber provides us with hard-to-get knowledge: (1) a thoughtful historical overview of the development of twentieth century medicine (1880 to the end of the 1990s), with particular focus on the doctor-patient relationship; and (2) a philosophically sophisticated analytical scheme that enables the reader to assess current developments (crudely: How is my HMO or managed care plan doing?).
Although Tauber subtitles his book "An Essay in Popular Philosophy," the word "popular" is somewhat misleading. The reader entirely innocent of twentieth-century Anlgo-American analyic philosophy as well as of its differences from Continental (European) philosophy, may intially have a bit of hard time following the argument.
Nevertheless, CONFESSIONS OF A MEDICINE MAN is the right book at the right time. Deeply philosophical and factually up-to-the-minute, it provides the compass we need to understand the real causes of the "crisis in medical care" that most average Americans face. For example, Tauber gives an extended--and brilliant--critique of one of those causes: the total acceptance of the idea of the "autonomous self" within the context of the doctor-patient relationship.
For the interested reader, Tauber provides a valuable (& wonderfully readable) section called "Bibliographic Notes.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Many decry the dehumanization of medicine, which doubtlessly has many causes but prominently includes the escalating encroachment of science and technology at the expense of the doctor-patient relationship. No one doubts the profound benefit of science and technology to medical practice, but Tauber aims to turn the tide in advocating that the ethic of the doctor-patient relationship should remain the core of medicine. He puts science in its proper place: science plus an instrumental role in the ethic of a healing relationship. The brilliance of this book goes beyond its sound philosophy; through a series of poignant clinical vignettes, the reader comes to know the author as a physician and a person. Here we have a model of humanism in medicine that all of us patients might wish could be brought back into the fore. Here is a writer who practices what he preaches.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

More About the Author

Alfred I. Tauber is Professor emeritus of Philosophy at the Boston University Department of Philosophy, Zoltan Kohn Professor emeritus of Medicine at the Boston University School of Medicine, and Director emeritus of The Boston University Center for Philosophy and History of Science. He also holds a visiting professorship at Tel Aviv University, where he teaches philosophy of science at the Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas.

Dr. Tauber is a hematologist and biochemist by training. Aside from over 125 research publications in biochemistry and immunology, he has published more than 100 papers on 19th and 20th century biomedicine, contemporary science studies, and ethics. These studies have focused on scientific epistemology: positivism, reductionism, and the relationship of facts and values. In 2008, he was awarded the Science Medal from the Institute of Advanced Studies of the University of Bologna for his critical studies of immunology and in 2011, an honorary doctorate from University of Haifa.

A Summary of Research Interests:

My key works, which have spawned the rest of my scholarship for the past twenty-five years, consist of three intellectual biographies (Metchnikoff, Thoreau, and Freud) and an autobiography. These studies, while philosophically informed, align closely with other genres - the history of ideas and moral philosophy. The problems that intrigue me - personal identity, the value structure of science, the effort to find coherence in a world fragmented by competing notions of truth - have carried me into topics that each demand an interpretation guided by an appraisal of our ethics, broadly construed. The inter-disciplinary nature of this work makes unusual demands on the reader. A bioethicist might not appreciate how discussions of patient autonomy relate to Thoreau's personal journey, or how a study of psychoanalysis complements a philosophical analysis of immunological theory, but for me, everything is of one piece. Below, I offer an outline of my work.

Typically, one's life experience shapes one's scholarship. In my case, to bridge two careers, namely, biomedical research and philosophy, became my central challenge. That transition occurred after I had established myself as a scientist, and thus my journey into the humanities was framed by an over-arching question: How might such a bridge be constructed and what drove me to build it?

In answer to that inquiry, I regard Henry David Thoreau and the Moral Agency of Knowing (2001) as my central work. There I explored the problem of translating scientific knowledge into personal meaning. Thoreau's reaction to the 19th century's professionalization of science and the ascendancy of new forms of objectivity offered me a case example of how science might be contextualized into its larger humanistic meanings and thereby present a picture of reality within human subjectivity. The effort does not pit scientific ways of knowing against other epistemologies, but recognizes how moral, aesthetic, and spiritual dimensions of experience might cohere within the reality offered by science. That effort built upon Thoreau's credo of imaginative individuality, one that I embraced as a powerful antidote to the nihilism born in his era and to the postmodern suspicions of individual autonomy so current in our own.

The basic message of Thoreau was extended in Science and the Quest for Meaning (2009). There I presented contemporary science from the perspective of current science studies, which generally maintains that science is unified neither in its methods, its standards, nor its interpretative strategies; that its various epistemologies fail any final form of objectivity; that theories and models evolve from loose creative strategies; and that the pragmatic assembly of facts relies on varying degrees of certainty and interpretative facility. These positions had been amply illustrated in my earlier critique of immunology's governing theory (The Immune Self, Theory or Metaphor? [1994]), but with Quest I had a larger agenda. Quest offered a humanistic account of how science must ultimately be integrated into notions both of social reality and of the existential placement of humans in their natural cosmos. The metaphysics of science and the metaphysics of personal experience can hardly be the same, but the effort to find coherence represents a critically important unfulfilled project.

This position had been inspired, in large measure, by the challenge of practicing humane medicine. As a research clinician, I faced the daunting task of integrating my scientific persona, and the demands of employing a scientific medicine, with the imperative of offering empathetic care. In Confessions of a Medicine Man (1999), I explored the emotional and moral tensions that resulted. This short book, my most popular, is a testament of my own professional awakening of the physician's moral identity. Readers appreciated the personal vignettes that I sprinkled in between my discursive descriptions of modern health care and my pleas for making medicine's science and technologies subordinate to the moral mandate of caring for the patient.

While Confessions combined autobiography and analysis, Patient Autonomy and the Ethics of Responsibility (2005) offered a detailed examination of the doctor-patient relationship coupled with a critique of current notions of patient autonomy. I argued that differing notions of autonomy depend on how personal identity is construed. In my view, politico-judicial models of citizen autonomy only confound the lived experience of illness and the realities of the clinic. I maintain that physician responsibility must be based on an interpersonal, relational construct of identity, not the severe autonomy of patient-as-independent-agent-and-consumer now so well adapted to the commodification of health care. To circle back: my Thoreau grounds this ethical position by highlighting a heightened moral sensitivity to everyday experience coupled with the sensitivity requisite to understanding not only others, but also ourselves.

Freud, the Reluctant Philosopher (2010) draws all of these issues together. Dispensing with arguments about the scientific standing of psychoanalysis, I seek to understand the abiding truth that Freudianism offers: We are strangers to ourselves, because we live largely unconsciously; and as we recall our past and recognize a reconfigured personal history, we gain the opportunity to assume responsibility for who we are and what we might become. That psychoanalysis has been called a "religion" seems perfectly apt to me: it holds that insight leads to redemption, a promise that despite the determinism governing our inner psychic life, a freedom beckons. The paradox - we are determined yet free - echoes Thoreau's own anthem.

My latest book, Requiem for the Ego: Freud and the Origins of Postmodernism (Stanford, forthcoming), recounts Freud's last great attempt to 'save' the autonomy of the ego, which drew philosophical criticism from the most prominent philosophers of the period - Adorno, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein. Despite their divergent orientations, each contested the ego's capacity to represent mental states through word and symbol to an agent surveying its own cognizance. By discarding the subject-object divide as a model of the mind, they dethroned Freud's depiction of the ego as a conceit of a misleading self-consciousness and a faulty metaphysics. Freud's inquisitors, while employing divergent arguments, found unacknowledged consensus in identifying the core philosophical challenges of defining agency and describing subjectivity. In Requiem, I have synthesized these philosophical attacks against psychoanalysis and, more generally, provided a kaleidoscopic portrait of the major developments in mid-20th century philosophy that prepared the conceptual grounding for postmodernism. Given my interests in personal identity and moral agency, this work extends the challenge of adhering to a humanism increasingly threatened by intellectual and cultural assaults.

I call my guiding philosophy a "moral epistemology," which attempts to capture the inextricable weaving of personal values into our use of knowledge and into our ways of knowing. Why is that important? Simply, an improved understanding of this process offers us the potential freedom of better exercising moral responsibility.

Personal web page: http://blogs.bu.edu/ait/