Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Conscious Experience Hardcover – November 1, 1996

ISBN-13: 978-0907845102 ISBN-10: 090784510X

4 New from $77.68 15 Used from $19.80
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$77.68 $19.80

Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student



Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 564 pages
  • Publisher: Imprint Academic (November 1, 1996)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 090784510X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0907845102
  • Product Dimensions: 1.5 x 6.2 x 9.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,948,312 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"The best concerted voice to date from the philosophers' camp" -- Susan Greenfield, [London] Times Higher Education Supplement

About the Author

Thomas Metzinger is Professor of Philosophy at the Johannes Gutenberg-UniversitAt Mainz, Germany. He is the editor of ""Neural Correlates of Consciousness"" (MIT Press, 2000).

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

14 of 15 people found the following review helpful By Carlos Camara on January 31, 2002
Format: Paperback
This book, probably together with "the nature of consciousness" is the best collection of papers on consciousness from a philosophical point of view. The introduction itself is worth the buy. Countless great contributions appear, dealing with every espect of the current debate on consciousness. Although dating from 1995, it is still an amazing introducion to consciousness and philosophy. I will not describe all papers, and indeed they are not all absolutely great, and of course it would be impossible to agree to all of them. But some papers, like Panpineaus on the anthipathetic fallacy, Metzingers on the philosophy of temporal binding, or Levines or Chalmers on qualia, are true jewels. The last section has some really interesting more scientifically inclined theorists presenting their models of consciousness. But just the variation and superstar authors makes tha whole attempt valuable and complete.
I cannot do anything else but to repeat myself and say that this is the best introduction tho the philosophical part of the problem of consciousness.
If I would object to anything, it would be of course of the fact that there are not many papers on the science of consciousness. I mean, there are some scientific debates that make grat philosophy. Consider blindsight, split brain cases, neglect, masking, among many other things. It is quite easy to philosophize about these issues, and that would have complemented the book nicely. Metzinger does sometning similar by discussing temporal binding, and empirical conjecture, from a philosophical prespective. Also, some aspects could have received better treatment, by including opposite views.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Paperback
This book was unavailable from my college's library, and, although I could get it by interlibrary loan, I eventually realized that there were just too many papers I wanted to read more than once, and I couldn't Xerox them all! What's amazing about it is that all the paper are original (although many summarize previously published work), all brought into existence by the editor, Thomas Metzinger --- and simultaneously published in German and English editions! I don't know how he did it, but my hat is off to him.

A few highlights: Chalmers"s influential "Dancing Qualia" paper; a contrarian paper by Georges Rey; Diana Raffman's paper on why phenomenology won't go away; William Lycan's cautious endorsement of (aspects of) Jackson's "knowledge argument"; position papers by David Rosenthal, Joseph Levine, Michael Tye, Martine Nida-Rumelin; etc. etc. Plus a rare misfire by Daniel Dennett that he probably wishes he could take back.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?