The Conservative Assault on the Constitution and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy Used
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: This item is gently used in good or better condition. If it is a textbook it may not have supplements. It may have some moderate wear and possibly include previous ownerâ€TMs name, some markings and/or is a former library book. We ship within 1 business day and offer no hassle returns. Big Hearted Books shares its profits with schools, churches and non-profit groups throughout New England. Thank you for your support!
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Conservative Assault on the Constitution Hardcover – September 28, 2010

25 customer reviews

See all 8 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
$21.94 $0.01

The Printer and the Preacher
Randy Petersen delivers a groundbreaking look at the strange friendship between George Whitefield and Benjamin Franklin. Learn more

Editorial Reviews


“Erwin Chemerinsky knows the Constitution as a legal scholar and the Supreme Court as a lawyer who represents clients there. It’s a rare and powerful combination that makes him uniquely qualified to write this disturbing and persuasive book about the impact of the current Supreme Court’s approach to constitutional interpretation.”

—Linda Greenhouse, Lecturer, Yale Law School; former New York Times Supreme Court correspondent

"Our Constitution depends on the courts to keep it alive; we all depend on Erwin Chemerinsky to remind us why that is so important. This book is essential reading for anyone who cares about preserving our constitutional birthright."

—Susan N. Herman, President, American Civil Liberties Union

About the Author

Erwin Chemerinsky is the founding dean of the University of California Irvine Law School. He is a graduate of Northwestern University and Harvard Law School. After teaching law at DePaul College of Law, he moved to the University of Southern California, where he taught from 1983 to 2004. He frequently argued cases before the U.S. Court of Appeals in various jurisdictions and occasionally before the U.S. Supreme Court. He is well known in Los Angeles, where he helped draft a new city charter (he chaired the charter commission), issued a report on the city's police department, and commented on the O.J. Simpson trial. From 2004 to 2008 he taught at Duke University School of Law, before returning to southern California to start the law school at UCI.

He is the author of Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, a widely used law school textbook.

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 336 pages
  • Publisher: Simon & Schuster; First Edition edition (September 28, 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1416574689
  • ISBN-13: 978-1416574682
  • Product Dimensions: 6.1 x 1.2 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (25 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #852,977 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Erwin Chemerinsky is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Southern California Law Center.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

43 of 55 people found the following review helpful By Evan on November 3, 2010
Format: Hardcover
This book explains in plain English how Supreme Court decisions affect the lives of all Americans. Chemerinsky writes the story of how the decisions made by Presidents regarding whom to appoint to the Court ripple throughout decades. Conservatives will probably disagree with Chemerinsky's judgments about what the Court has done as it shifted to the right, but they should also find it interesting to learn how the Court shifted right and what it might mean for the future.

I believe the most important aspect of the book is how clearly Chemerinsky is able to demonstrate that there really is no one way interpret the Constitution. Put on talk radio today and you are sure to hear something like "if you believe in the Constitution, we have to do x y z." But a belief in the Constitution does not dictate obvious policy choices. Instead, the Constitution is written in often vague and broad language that does not answer a specific fact scenario. For example, the First Amendment does not mention anything about prayer in schools, but mentions that government should not establish religion. The Supreme Court decides whether or not the establishment clause prohibits prayer in schools, and really the answer is not obvious. Many of the most important Supreme Court decisions are decided by a 5-4 vote. This means that 4 of the most educated, intelligent, and informed legal minds in the country, obviously experts on Constitutional law, thought the other 5 justices were misinterpreting the Constitution. But from that moment on, the 5 Justices have the correct interpretation, and the 4 Justices the incorrect.

Constitutional law greatly impacts our lives.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
44 of 57 people found the following review helpful By R. Bigelow on December 1, 2010
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
The author leads the reader through case after case, often quoting from both the majority and dissenting opinions, showing how the court arrived at Roe vs. Wade, for instance, and how subsequent Courts have worked to erode and limit a woman's rights since it was decided.
That's just one example. He takes separation of church and state, habeas corpus rights and personal privacy and gives a historical account of each, showing how the increasingly conservative court, while decrying "judicial activism," has actually been consistently activist on issues that involved conservative ideology, overturning previous decisions with abandon, while claiming smugly that they are respectful of previous decisions.
The most damning point he makes is the two-faced posture of the Gang of Four(Scalia, Roberts, Alito and Thomas). On the one hand they pretend to be strict constructionists, limiting individual's rights to those explicitly enumerated in the Constitution and its amendments. For example, they ruled against a victim of police negligence whose children were murdered by an ex-spouse after she asked for protection and the cops didn't bother to take any action, saying that the Constitution does not guarantee police competence (or words to that effect) but they were adamant in the recent ruling that corporations have the rights of individuals as far as campaign spending is concerned...clearly not a "right" explicitly granted in the Constitution. Ideology trumps principles with these guys. Real hypocrites!
This is a very dense book, and the reader must have an interest in the details of case law and legal precedents to stay with it. I recommend it highly to anyone with those interests.
10 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful By George R. on September 27, 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I bought this book in order to get a liberal, progressive interpretation on some issues I consider critical to our daily lives. Professor Chemerinsky provides a wonderful first person narrative on some very intricate and complicated issues and carefully lays out the underlying cases heard by the Supreme Court that have influenced or directed contemporary thinking on these subjects. I genuinely appreciate the careful, logical thinking and reasoning on each case; I wish there was more of a reflective analysis against the thinking or beliefs of the framers of the Constitution. Chemerinsky's essays on the flawed thinking of recent Supreme Court decisions is refreshing and his openly progressive position clarifies any bias toward a more liberal interpretive perspective. I think the totality of the work would be significantly enhanced if there were anecdotal entries identifying issues or interpretations encountered by the founding fathers that contribute to or support the more progressive perspective, or; give cause to discount or reduce any conservative inerpretation, contemporary or otherwise.

Overall, this is a work that any reasonably minded person should read in order to be more informed and aware of how the Supreme Court's works may affect every citizen's life.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Amazon Customer on August 27, 2012
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Every voter should read this book. Having lived through the changes initiated by the Nixon appointments, it is useful to have a concise summary of the persistent assault in a single book. I am guilty of seeing the conservative's assault as individual battles where sane people win some and crazy people win some. By controlling the Supreme Court, they have established a massive beachhead that rational people must oppose with each vote. The maxim that liberty erodes in small increments over time is very clear.

I don't advocate term limits for justices. The idea that they should not be subject to popular whimsy is a good one. That some have changed their perspectives over time is evidence that taking the long view was insightful. I do cringe every time I hear/read the phrase "founding fathers." We have the best opportunity of all nations to form a more perfect union, but the idea that a cadre of wealthy landowners, many of whom owned people, are to be taken as absolute and literal definers of our rights over 200 years later is absurd. Those men never intended that women would be more than chattel. They never could imagine a broad and diverse culture that we have today. But they did clearly establish that the least of us have inalienable rights. They may have made a mistake in their perspective that allowed the changes for a better U.S. that we have today, but those are the rights we have. So, today it is absurd that we as a collected public can tell a woman how to control her body. A woman, and only that woman has a right to choose. The husband doesn't, the priest doesn't, nor does the Supreme Court have the right to treat a woman as chattel for breeding.

The rights and sanctions defined in the constitution are broad and fairly comprehensive.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews