Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Raises Serious Questions About the Oklahoma City Bombing, August 14, 2008
Actually, the title of this DVD is a little bit misleading. In the post 9-11 world, many are automatically turned off by anything with "conspiracy" in the title. The use of the word "conspiracy" in connection with the OKC bombing might lead one to think that someone is attempting to make a case that the government was somehow responsible for the terrorist act, a la the 9-11 conspiracy theorists who maintain that Bush and Cheney had detailed information about the attacks long before they happened or were directly involved in attacking the Pentagon and Twin Towers in order to make it look as if the nation had come under terrorist attack. But this is not really what is being argued in this documentary.
There are a few key book-length sources on which the DVD seems to be based, and if you are interested in this subject, then may I recommend that you check out _The Third Terrorist_ by Jayna Davis (an investigative reporter), _Others Unknown_ by Steven Jones (Tim McVeigh's defense attorney), and _The Enemy of My Enemy_ by George Michael (a university professor of political science).
The long and short of it is this: According to the DVD and these sources, there was no "conspiracy" on the part of the federal government(during the Clinton years) to bomb the Alfred P. Murrah building. Likewise, there is no doubt that Tim McVeigh was guilty of delivering the bomb to its destination and that Terry Nichols was his key accomplice in this atrocious act of mass murder. But questions arise about other persons involved in the bombing--remember, as the title of Jones' book reminds us, the official indictment for the crime handed down by the judge was against McVeigh, Nichols, and "others unknown." So a federal judge maintains that there were others involved in the bombing, but we don't know who they are at this time. That alone should give us pause.
Well, who might these "others" have been? Well, nobody claims to know for sure, but a closer examination of some of the associations and sympathies of McVeigh and Nichols is particularly revealing. For starters, Terry Nichols spent time in the Philippines in the early 1990s--what he was doing there we don't exactly know, but there is evidence (according to the book sources) to show that he was associating with and receiving training from individuals associated with the Islamist terror group Abu Sayyaf and from Ramzi Yousef (mastermind of the first WTC bombing in 1993). And Tim McVeigh was a known sympathizer to Palestinian teror groups like Islamic Jihad and Hizballah.
This may come as a surprise to many, who might wonder what in the world extreme right-wing gun nut white supremacists could possibly have in common with Islamic terorists. Well, as George Michael shows in his excellent book, quite a lot. The main thing that they have in common, though, is absolute and total hatred of Israel and the Jews, and the fanatical belief that America is somehow controlled by Zionists and that the American people are brainwashed by the Zionist-controlled media.
Really, when you think about the similarities between the Oklahoma City bombing and the first (1993) WTC bombing (right down to the Ryder rental truck and the ammonium nitrate!) are you surprised? Or when you realize that the OKC bombing bore all the classic hallmarks of those truck bombings in Lebanon in the 1980s? (I suppose there are a lot of people who can't think that far back.)
Nobody is saying that Bill Clinton or Janet Reno or anyone esle in the Clinton administration is directly responsible for the bombing. If they are guilty of anything, it is not aggressively pursuing the identity of those "others unknown." The Enemy of My Enemy: The Alarming Convergence of Militant Islam And the Extreme RightThe Third Terrorist: The Middle East Connection to the Oklahoma City BombingOthers Unknown: Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing Conspiracy
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
If you want to open a wound, July 24, 2008
I misread when I saw this. I thought this would be the facts behind the OCB: how it happened, the trial, how the victims' family mourn. Instead the narrator immediately says, "Judge these uncovered facts for yourself." This whole work is about whether other groups, detestable ones, helped McVeigh accomplish this tragedy. That's not a question upon which I really want to dwell. Those who love conspiracy theories may love this work. However, I was looking for something inspiring that would help viewers overcome and survivor terrible events. I thought ideas would be offered about how we can prevent an OCB from ever happening again. You won't get this here. This is a dark, dark, dark work on an equally dark subject.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|