2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A staple of Constitutional Law, September 14, 2005
This review is from: Constitutional Law Hornbook (Hornbooks) (Hardcover)
Hornbooks have long been a staple resource for law students and legal researchers. This text by Nowak et al. is a good text for Constitutional Law - it is not comprehensive, in that it has intentionally excluded other areas (conflict of laws, criminal procedure, etc.) that are likely covered in other law classes. This text deliberately looks at the areas of Constitutional Law that are most frequently used and discussed in classes, in courts and in the media.
The authors present a very case-law based presentation. They do occasionally add extra elements (for example, they reference Corwin as a substantial predecessor; in addition to his case-law work, he is known for essays and lectures on the philosophical underpinnings of constitutional law, particularly the 'higher law' aspect of American regard for the Constitution).
The three primary sections of the text are I - Judicial Review, II - Federal System and Federal Powers, and III - Individual Rights and Liberties. Within the first section, the idea of judicial review, jurisdiction, and Supreme Court review are introduced; somewhat ironically, the idea of judicial review for Constitutionality by the Supreme Court and other courts is not itself a part of the Constitution. Within the second section, issues of federal authority, fiscal powers, commerce and regulation, Congressional and Presidential powers, and international affairs are addressed. In the final section, after an overview of individual liberties contained in the Bill of Rights and other amendments, discussions include substantive due process and procedural due process, equal protection, civil rights and citizenship.
The text includes appendices which include the list of justices of the Supreme Court, an interesting section of proposed amendments to the Constitution that were not ratified, and (not surprisingly) the text of the Constitution itself.
I take off one star for the editing that this volume needed to get but did not. While not detrimental to the content, the number of mistakes is occasionally distracting. This book really is intended for lawyers and future lawyers, so the language is often 'legal-ese', but for a thorough grounding in the area of constitutional law as done by the lawyers and judges, this is a good text to study.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Helpful, but not as extensive as others, December 11, 2006
I used this and the Emanuel's con law outlines. This one is no where near as thorough as Emanuel's, and it doesn't go as deep into the opinions (especially dissents, concurrences) but it has its own advantages. Mainly, this is great for having a very clear statement of the black letter law. It's not elementary, not any any means, and I really appreciated it when I was putting together my own outline, especially since my professor emphasized theory/interpretation in his lectures: this was great for putting everything into perspective.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good Quick Review of Constitutionaol law, December 15, 2007
While not particually in depth (most concurrences/dissents are omitted), this text will give you the bread and butter of constitutional law. If you are a student who uses Barron's Con law textbook published by Lexisnexis, then this book will greatly help you as it will follow your text pretty closely.
For a more detailed understanding of the field, I would defintatley recommend a different supplement such as Emanuel or Chermensky.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No