| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
29 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Outstanding book on the racalist right,
By
This review is from: Contemporary Voices of White Nationalism in America (Paperback)
The racialist right in the United States has grown substantially in recent years. Editors Carol M. SWAIN and Russ NIELI rightfully point out the reasons for this:
* the growing number of legal and illegal non-white immigrants * resentment of affirmative action, which favours minorities * the exponential growth of the internet, which allows like- minded individuals to share their views and concerns and form communities The editors contend that white nationalism in the United States will continue to grow. In a lengthy introductory essay(90 pages, almost a third of the book) SWAIN/NIELI, who do not share the views expressed by the interviewees, point out that race related issues and white nationalism need to be addressed (and rebuted)in open debate instead of being refuted out of hand. SWAIN/NIELI elaborate at length on what they call "American exceptionalism" (i.e. the relative success of the multi-ethnic/multi-racial US society whereas in general multiethnic/-racial societies tend to break apart; cf. former Austrian-Hungarian empire,Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, among others). The reasons for the success of the "American exceptionalism" according to SWAIN/NIELI are: * a self-definition of nationhood based on liberty and equality * the future orientation of the American Dream (immigrants tended to break with ethnic strifes of the past and concentrated on economic success in the USA) * the unifying factor of the English language * the colour-blind theory of justice * theological arguments to the effect that all people are created equal. (I would like to stress here that I am only refering the views expressed by SWAIN/NIELI in the introductory essay and do not share them.) The remainder of the book consists of interviews conducted with ten white nationalists: 1.) White rights advocats Jared TAYLOR - founder of American Renaissance magazine Reno WOLFE - who heads a pro-white organisation, very similar to the black NAACP Michael LEVIN - author of WHY RACE MATTERS: RACE DIFFERENCES AND WHAT THEY MEAN 2.) White separatists Don BLACK - who heads the stormfront website David DUKE - this former presidential candidate needs no introduction Michael H. HART - a Jewish scholar who promotes the separation of the USA into four parts along racial lines ( a white, a black, a hispanic and a mixed race state) 3.) White christian Dan GAYMAN - a pastor of the "church of Israel", who argues racial separation from a theological standpoint 4.) White supremacists Matthew HALE - "pontifex maximus" of the World Church of the Creator Lisa TURNER - also with the World Church of the Creator the late William PIERCE - author of the infamous TURNER DIARIES and the lesser known follow-up HUNTER (both available here from amazon) and founder of the National Alliance Truth be told I was for the most part very impressed with what the interviewees said. Contrary to popular belief these proponents of white nationalism are very educated and eloquent. They are not afraid to tell facts, which are very political incorrect in today's multi-cultural society, e.g. about substantial differences in intelligence along racial lines (a recurring theme in the interviews) or exceptionally high crime rates among blacks (David DUKE: "...we have a situation in Washington D.C., where we have over 50 percent of all young, black males between the ages 18 and 35 being in jail, on parole, or probation, or being involved in the criminal justice system at any one moment.",p. 182) Even if you oppose views expressed by the interviewees, you will find most interviews intellectually stimulating (as even the editors contend). I was particularly impressed with DUKE, LEVIN and HART. You may want to skip the interview with Dan GAYMAN, though, unless you are particularly interested in White christianity, as the tiresome bit (chockfull with quotes from the Bible) clearly shows GAYMAN's trade as preacher and is more a sermon than an interview. Overall, an execellent introduction to white nationalism! Hugely recommended!
36 of 45 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Recognizing bias,
By A Customer
This review is from: Contemporary Voices of White Nationalism in America (Hardcover)
From reading the text, I find that the major reasons for the swelling White Nationalist movement include:1) Racist policies such as Affirmative action, and Racial quotas 2) Outsourcing of American jobs to the third world 3) Import of cheap labor and undermining wages and living 4) Loss of mainstream American culture and values due to 5) Destruction and displacement of Euro-Americans through 6) Neo-con driven war in the Mid-east, due to Islamic attention 7) Restrictions of free speech due to Political Correctness My appraisal is that these are all valid concerns. Considering the fact that all of these issues are worsening rather than improving, I suspect that White Nationalism will continue to gain momentum throughout the West. The author makes it clear where she stands on the issue. Therefore, I find it thorough and well written but biased. For a comprehensive background written from a WN perspective, visit
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
bought on reviews,
By jenna randolph (USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Contemporary Voices of White Nationalism in America (Paperback)
These interviewers are correct, but it might have been a better book if there were not so much contextualizing of other people's voices. In the final analysis, it was mostly commentary and so it was as if the academics were giving people a "voice"---but not really. The "voice" of the men were mostly offered so they could be "interpreted" by the editors, who ---in this way--- are really not editors at all, but rather filters for experience, attempting to guide and manipulate responses.
Ms. Swain is an African American affirmative action baby, family of 11 kids, poor, married at 16, and much more, then given an "Ivy League" education, and passed through despite difficulties---so when reading the "editorial" one has to "consider the source." For obvious reasons of what she's had given to her, she is highly invested in the system that produced her and is willing to perpetuate it (why she was put forward one imagines). She's not one who will ever look deeply at the true horrors that have resulted, the inverse-morality in the culture, the radical demograhic shifts, the violence of children totally shut out, not only from a country their own families (who really live there) tried to create so they would have a home, the distaste with which so many really react to the culture created by her viewpoint, to the point that many 'best and brightest' have simply left any sort of public life. From reading about her, I've had the impression she feels that she's "made good" on her affirmative action. So, the commentary should be read against the highly biased, and politically invested reasons this was brought forth.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|